*BECAUSE IT WASN'T A "COVER UP". It was a clever ploy to avert attention from the publication of the 7/7 London Bombings, a.k.a. cover up. This mass publicity is totally inconsistent with a cover up. It's the antithetical of a cover up. People speculate that the McCanns (Jerry and Kate) had some dirt on the government and called in a favour. I'd not say the mass publicity was much of a favour, and their actions in setting up a defence fund, fraudulently mascarading as a Find Madeline Fund's set up was very proficient and was not objected to by the UK authorities. I'm certain that it's more a case of what the British establishment had on the McCanns, and the layers of lies put out about the case makes speculation on them highly unreliable---and for the purposes of this theory, irrelevant. I believe that the Portuguese government went along with not charging the McCanns as they were offered a deal. This then extended to the Gancalo Amaral "libel" case, which no one can cite the libel he's alleged to have committed. I believe that it's very likely that the deal was that the Portuguese's reward for covering up 7/7 was that they'd be spared any pressure to take part in any NATO Gladio false flags domestically, and thus, both they and the UK are winners, as Portugal is not that important militarily and thus not needed to mount illegal wars with the pretext of mass public approval based on terrorism events, blamed on Muslims in their country---whereas in the UK's case, this is essential. Thanks and credits to: John Kimber for making the link in terms of a significant event and the dates; Nick Kollestrom for proving what a total balls up the 7/7 false flag was and how many things which were really meant to be kept out of the public's eye miserably failed; and, anyone else who can contribute and allow me to better understand if this theory has any legs, as I'm certain that it does. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUH6zXqYJPw

https://www.scribd.com/document/247748127/13-04-29-Winding-Up-Order-1490-2013 I and one other victim of the ongoing ALPonz (Aston Lloyd Ponzi Scheme) attended the Winding Up Petition of the ALPIL (Aston Lloyd & Partners International Ltd.). ALPIL which had been used to make "all international purchases" of the Aston Lloyd Holdings Plc group, as it says on their email chasers, including those which were criminally not included in the here described procedure. The video concerns the Winding Up petition of ALPIL, which had been being criminally stage managed by Re10's Bijal Shah, Nimish Patel, Finbarr O'Connell and Adam Stephens, which has now been followed into an equally preposterous, clearly criminal de facto 'insolvency procedure' by some other firm of criminals, posing as legitimate court sanctioned and court approved official procedure (concerning wheat in the Ukraine (which didn't exist) and biofuels in Africa 'somewhere' ('somewhere: a.k.a. that didn't exist). No one representing the company involved, aside a barrister appointed by Mundays solicitors who's Oliver Jackson became very disturbed to discover that he was facilitating a crime, and his boss told me never to contact them again. Mundays had been instructed to wind the company up by a firm who had no money to gain from this and seemed to not have any actual business, but look to be a purpose built facility to have the de facto Liquidators chucked off the job without them having to account for having done nothing as they ought to have in a legitimate Administration of Liquidation, which was clearly the plan all along. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD6zeVQCLqE