Published By
Created On
20 Jan 2023 23:40:34 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
A rant “Come out of her my people”
It’s too late to fix or change any human created civil law system of government. It’s too late to create a new human civil law system of government. The only options now are: 1) “Come out of her my people” or 2) surrender and accept being civilian bound to the Great Whore Babylon.
“If we search out the origins of Roman law, we must study Babylon…”
• Pollack & Maitland, The History of the English Law Before the time of Edward I. p.561
“The civil law arose from the ashes of the old Roman Empire and added to its emperor worship the cloak of nominal Christianity. By the tenth century, the imperial Roman Church had become the chief carrier of the old Roman Empire’s civil law tradition; the visible trappings and ceremony of its religious-political doctrines, through deceit, lent an air of intimidation, respectability, and prestige. Thus, by the canon law, ancient Rome’s civil law persisted, not only in its continental presence but also by its tentacles –reaching, groping, grasping, throughout the world. By the seventh century, Roman law again reached into Britain. This time, however, not by Rome’s legions but by Rome’s priesthood. Thus began in earnest the struggle between the common law and the civil law, between Scriptures and Justinian’s Code. That struggle came to dominate, define, and determine the history of Britain, her colonies, North America, and the United States.” • Brent Winters, The Excellence of Common Law: Compared & Contrasted with Civil Law In Light of History, Nature & Scripture; p. 38
Quotes from: “Missing Links Discovered In Assyrian Tablets” by E. Raymond Capt, M.A., A.I.A., F.S.A., Scot Chapter 12, p.199
“Their [U.K. & USA] legal systems and constitutions are built upon the same Common Law, which had its origin in the Law of Moses – the Law of the LORD – hence the fame of American & British justice throughout the world. We should point out that these laws formed a part of our culture long before the Christian Era. These facts give us added proof, forming another ‘link’ in the chain of evidence connecting us with ancient Israel.
The Common Law began in England as far back as 1100 BC when it was codified by Brutus (Brute) of Troy. Brutus was a great grandson of Aenaes, a descendant of Judah-Zarah [See Genesis 38: 27-30]. The Law was again codified by Malmutius – about 500 BC. King Alfred the Great again codified it. Alfred, the renown Saxon law-giver and Administrator during the Saxon period, places the Divine origin of the Law in the forefront. The following is taken from “Alfred the Great” which proclaims the law of Moses as the basis of Anglo-Saxon Administration:
The King’s Laws
“…coming, then to his task with this in view, we find Alfred’s code, or Alfred’s dooms as they are called, starting with an almost literal transcript of the Decalogue. The only variations of any moment are, that the second commandment is omitted from its right place, and stands as the tenth…immediately after the Ten Commandments come selections from the Mosaic Code, chiefly from the 21st, 22nd, and 23rd chapters of Exodus, very lightly modified”
United States supreme Court, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973): “In this country, the law in effect in all but a few States until mid-19th century was the pre-existing English common law...It was not until after the War Between the States that legislation (civil law) began generally to replace the common law.”
“Before the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 justice was administered in England chiefly in people’s courts and the law enforced was in the strictest sense unwritten; that is, it was handed down by oral tradition. After the conquest the king gradually established a system of royal or king’s courts which eventually all but crowded out the Anglo-Saxon [people’s] courts. The theory of the king’s courts was that the king was the fountainhead of justice and judges acted as his agents…Purely traditionary law, being administered by the people themselves, does not need to be justified to the people; but the [civil] law as administered by judges who are set over the people [gods many] must be thus justified. The [civil] judge must give his reason or basis for his decision…” Summary of American Law, George L. Clark, p.x Nature & Sources of Law.
The Hebrew word rigmah is translated "council", but literally means a “heap of stones” (altar), or “gathering of stones”. It is from the Hebrew word Regem meaning "friend" & is the same three letters of ragam defined "stone". Gatherings of Stones or Living Stone Altars came together for many different reasons in service to the people: ministerial services: health, education & welfare; judicial services: “people’s courts” administering unwritten law while Israel was scattered, not knowing that their customs came from Horeb/Sinai and the Torah.
“If we search out the origins of Roman law, we must study Babylon…”
• Pollack & Maitland, The History of the English Law Before the time of Edward I. p.561
“The civil law arose from the ashes of the old Roman Empire and added to its emperor worship the cloak of nominal Christianity. By the tenth century, the imperial Roman Church had become the chief carrier of the old Roman Empire’s civil law tradition; the visible trappings and ceremony of its religious-political doctrines, through deceit, lent an air of intimidation, respectability, and prestige. Thus, by the canon law, ancient Rome’s civil law persisted, not only in its continental presence but also by its tentacles –reaching, groping, grasping, throughout the world. By the seventh century, Roman law again reached into Britain. This time, however, not by Rome’s legions but by Rome’s priesthood. Thus began in earnest the struggle between the common law and the civil law, between Scriptures and Justinian’s Code. That struggle came to dominate, define, and determine the history of Britain, her colonies, North America, and the United States.” • Brent Winters, The Excellence of Common Law: Compared & Contrasted with Civil Law In Light of History, Nature & Scripture; p. 38
Quotes from: “Missing Links Discovered In Assyrian Tablets” by E. Raymond Capt, M.A., A.I.A., F.S.A., Scot Chapter 12, p.199
“Their [U.K. & USA] legal systems and constitutions are built upon the same Common Law, which had its origin in the Law of Moses – the Law of the LORD – hence the fame of American & British justice throughout the world. We should point out that these laws formed a part of our culture long before the Christian Era. These facts give us added proof, forming another ‘link’ in the chain of evidence connecting us with ancient Israel.
The Common Law began in England as far back as 1100 BC when it was codified by Brutus (Brute) of Troy. Brutus was a great grandson of Aenaes, a descendant of Judah-Zarah [See Genesis 38: 27-30]. The Law was again codified by Malmutius – about 500 BC. King Alfred the Great again codified it. Alfred, the renown Saxon law-giver and Administrator during the Saxon period, places the Divine origin of the Law in the forefront. The following is taken from “Alfred the Great” which proclaims the law of Moses as the basis of Anglo-Saxon Administration:
The King’s Laws
“…coming, then to his task with this in view, we find Alfred’s code, or Alfred’s dooms as they are called, starting with an almost literal transcript of the Decalogue. The only variations of any moment are, that the second commandment is omitted from its right place, and stands as the tenth…immediately after the Ten Commandments come selections from the Mosaic Code, chiefly from the 21st, 22nd, and 23rd chapters of Exodus, very lightly modified”
United States supreme Court, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973): “In this country, the law in effect in all but a few States until mid-19th century was the pre-existing English common law...It was not until after the War Between the States that legislation (civil law) began generally to replace the common law.”
“Before the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 justice was administered in England chiefly in people’s courts and the law enforced was in the strictest sense unwritten; that is, it was handed down by oral tradition. After the conquest the king gradually established a system of royal or king’s courts which eventually all but crowded out the Anglo-Saxon [people’s] courts. The theory of the king’s courts was that the king was the fountainhead of justice and judges acted as his agents…Purely traditionary law, being administered by the people themselves, does not need to be justified to the people; but the [civil] law as administered by judges who are set over the people [gods many] must be thus justified. The [civil] judge must give his reason or basis for his decision…” Summary of American Law, George L. Clark, p.x Nature & Sources of Law.
The Hebrew word rigmah is translated "council", but literally means a “heap of stones” (altar), or “gathering of stones”. It is from the Hebrew word Regem meaning "friend" & is the same three letters of ragam defined "stone". Gatherings of Stones or Living Stone Altars came together for many different reasons in service to the people: ministerial services: health, education & welfare; judicial services: “people’s courts” administering unwritten law while Israel was scattered, not knowing that their customs came from Horeb/Sinai and the Torah.
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
English
More from the publisher
Controlling
VIDEO
THE A
AsylumStatePart2
The Asylum State is the Kingdom of God, aka the Kingdom of Heaven (its territorial jurisdiction is everywhere under the heaven, the atmosphere, wherever two or three of His people are are have COME OUT of the civil law system and died a civil death to live a natural life, a monastic life as a member of the Body of Yahshua, a kingdom of priests: servant ministers. The Asylum State is not created by mere "magic words" and more "legal fictions" on paper ("you'll know them by their fruit"), but rather by DOERS of the WORD that have come out of the civil law body politic, and given up their "civil life" to be the servants of the kingdom that can truly offer SANCTUARY, provide a place of refuge and protection to "sinners" and those "coming out of her" so they cannot be taken without sacrilege.
"A free individual in the state of nature is not a kingdom except to himself. To be a citizen of the Kingdom of God he needs a body or civitas to form the asylum state. The asylum state is a city of
refuge from local and foreign abuses of justice. To form a civitas or body politic some men must give up their liberty so that others may be free. By this act of sacrifice an entrance to the Kingdom of God at hand, the right to be ruled by God may be maintained. This is what Abraham, Moses, and Jesus were doing with their called out ministers, their living stones who belonged to God and were bond
servants of Christ, living in the world but not of it, to set the captive free and return everyman to his family and to his possessions". - Greg Williams, Contracts, Covenants & Constitutions, page 115.
http://www.hisholychurch.org/printer/CCCprint.pdf
"Asylum. A sanctuary, or place of refuge and protection, where criminals and debtors found shelter, and from which they could not be taken without sacrilege. Shelter, refuge, protection for the hand of justice. The word includes not only the place, but also the shelter, security and protection..." - Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Ed., page 114.
“Church. In its most general sense, the religious society founded and established by Jesus the Christ (Yahushua ha Mashiach, aka Yahushua the anointed, dejure, lawful, rightful, sovereign, king, law maker, ruling judge: god & master [lord]) to receive, preserve, and propagate His doctrines & ordinances. Body or community of Christians, united under one form of government by the profession of the same faith (fidelity/allegiance) and the observance of the same ritual and ceremonies. It may also mean a body of communicants gathered into church order (ministers, apostles, Levites)... Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Ed., page 219
Society. An association or company of persons (generally unincorporated) united together by mutual consent, in order to deliberate, determine, and act jointly for some common purpose. In a wider sense, the community or public; the people in general… Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Ed., page 1247
Black’s is a civil law dictionary. Person is a term of civil law. Black’s is defining “Civil Society. The “Religious Society founded by Jesus the Christ is a body of MEN under Natural Law, Divine Will, The Creator’s Law as the Supreme Sovereign of the heaven & earth.
Maxims of Law: Man is a term of nature (natural law), person of the civil law. All Persons are men, but not all Men, persons.
Yahshua's Church, Assembly, Congregation, Nation (Qahal, Edah, Ekklesia), as a society, is a corpus or body politic incorporated by Jesus the Christ (Yahshua ha Mashiach) in His authority as a Sovereign Power, a Ruling Judge, a law maker, a mighty authority, aka a god. Just as civil rulers are sovereign powers are gods many of the earth give their allegiance to, put their faith (fidelity) in.
Ordinances A rule established by authority; a permanent rule of action; a law or statute… Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Ed., page 989
The US, which is a corporate body politic with members called US nationals, US citizens, US persons has its own RITUALS and CEREMONIES. Every corporate body politic has their own unique rituals and ceremonies. The US for instance as a huge ceremony every four years when it swears in its new CEO (president), EMPERATOR (commander-in-chief) & APOTHEOS (appointer of Federal gods/judges) called the Presidential Inauguration. US rituals include participating in the public religious welfare program of Social Security, State issued Birth registrations, Public education, the State of Union Address, the State of the State address by US State governors. The US has its own "Holy days" (holidays): President's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving, etc. so the US has its own ceremonial calendar its citizens keep. The same is true for YHWH's Kingdom.
DISCLAIMER: This is NOT legal advice. This is for educational and informational purposes only.
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
WHY A
Why-are-we,-me-and-hopefully-you-too,-waking-up-to-see-the-truth-of-The-Way-of-YHWH-at-this-time_
Does the Word of YHWH explain why so many people all around the world at this time in history are waking up and feeling a need to repent, come out of 'Babylon' (civil systems), and return to keeping the Torah of YHWH? The simple answer is found in The Word.
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
ONLY
only2formsoflawpart2
"But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed." - James 1:25
“In respect to the ground of the authority of law, it is divided as natural law, or the law of nature or of God, and positive law”. Positive Law is, “Law actually ordained or established, under human sanctions, as distinguished from the law of nature or natural law, which comprises those consideration of justice, right, and universal expediency that are announced by the voice of reason or of revelation.” – Bouvier’s
“The Laws Of Nature And Nature’s God, a phrase used in the U.S. Declaration of Independence, 1776. But the concepts embodied in the phrase didn’t originate with Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration. The “law of nature” was a common term used by historic legal such as Grotius, Burlamaqui, Blackstone and others. The law of nature’s God, a lesser used term, was more commonly called the divine law, or the revealed law, meaning the laws of God revealed in verbal form, or the laws of God revealed in the Bible.” – LONANG Institute
"As of the time of the writing of the Constitution, there were [he said] two great systems of law in the world--the Civil Law. . . . and the Common Law. . . .the basic concept of these two systems was as opposite as the poles--in the Civil Law the source of all law is the personal ruler; . . . he [the ruler] is sovereign. In the Common Law, . . . the source of all law is the people; they, as a whole, are sovereign. During the centuries, these two systems have had an almost deadly rivalry for the control of society, the Civil Law and its fundamental concepts being the instrument through which ambitious men of genius and selfishness have set up and maintained despotisms; the Common Law, with its basic principles, being the instrument through which men of equal genius, but with the love of mankind burning in their souls, have established and preserved liberty and free institutions. . . . The Civil Law was developed by Rome [Babylon] . . . The people under this system have those rights, powers, and privileges, and those only which the sovereign considers are for their good or for his advantage. He adds or takes away as suits his royal pleasure. All the residuum of power is in the Emperor. Under this system, the people look into the law to see what they may do. They may only do what the Emperor has declared they may do. . . . Under our common law system, we look into the law to see what we may not do, for we may do everything we are not forbidden to do. This civil law concept explains why, over the centuries, it has been possible for the head of a state, operating under this concept, to establish with comparative ease a dictatorship. We must always remember that despotism and tyranny, with all their attendant tragedies to the people, as in Russia today, come to nations because one man, or a small group of men, seize and exercise by themselves the three great divisions of government--the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. . . . When the [Civil Law] concept has been operative, [peoples] have suffered the resulting tragedies--[such as] loss of liberty, oppression, great poverty among the masses, insecurity, [and] wanton disregard of human life." - J. Reuben Clark
George Gordon Law Hour and Editorial Review: Common Law series
http://georgegordon.org/audio/radio/search.lsp?r=95&q=common+law
FREE PDF E-book: "The Covenants of the Gods" by Gregory Williams
http://www.hisholychurch.org/printer/COGprint.pdf
DISCLAIMER: This is not legal advice. For Educational purposes only.
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
HOW D
HowDidWeGetHere
What is a nation, state, country? What is a social contract? How do we bind ourselves as “persons” to be “corporate members” of a civil law body politic or corporate? What is a citizen? Is a citizen a dependent ward of the State or a mere inhabitant of the territory?
It is said if you want to know the end you must understand the beginning.
It is said, if you change your "god" (mighty authority, sovereign power, law maker, ruling judge) you change your law, if you change you law you change your "god".
Were the common law allodial free men, mere inhabitants part of “We the People”? Or are Americans today voluntary bond servants of “We the People” by consent?
For more information: FREE PDF E-books:
"Contracts, Covenants & Constitutions" by Gregory Williams
http://www.hisholychurch.org/printer/CCCprint.pdf
"Covenants of the Gods" by Gregory Williams
http://www.hisholychurch.org/printer/COGprint.pdf
George Gordon Law Hour and Editorial Review: Admiralty
http://georgegordon.org/audio/radio/search.lsp?r=95&q=admiralty
Disclaimer: This is NOT legal advice. This is for educational purposes.
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
DON'T
DontThinkIDestroyTheLaw
For some odd reason a lot of Christian civilians like to believe the Christ lied in Matthew 5:17 and even though He said He didn’t come to destroy the Law of YHWH, the word “fulfill” meant He did destroy it by nullification even though the next few verses (18-20) make it clear what He meant by fulfill is to fill the law up with the true intent and meaning as the example to follow and emulate.
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
CITIZ
CitizenVCITIZEN4
“The term ‘citizen’ is distinguishable from ‘resident’ or ‘inhabitant.’ One may be a citizen of a state without being an inhabitant, or an inhabitant without being a citizen.” -Kelm v. Carlson, C.A. Ohio, 473, F2d 1267, 1271.
“Citizenship of or in government as a person, as opposed to Natural Citizenship as an inhabitant, is a privilege granted or denied and regulated by a government, created according to the rules established by that government. If an individual wishes to join and become a person in a legal society and be governed by the rules of that society’s government, then he is legally bound to abide by the rules of that created society. He bars himself from his own liberty and becomes a surety for the debt of his benefactor.” - Gregory Williams.
"The term resident & citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by congress...an individual can be a Citizen of one of the several states without being a citizen of the United States " - US v Anthony 24 Fed. 829
And an individual may become, “a citizen of the United States without being a Citizen of a State” – Slaughter-House Cases; US v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 549
“Both before and after the 14th Amendment to the federal constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state” – US v. Cruikshank
“A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government..” – Kitchens v. Steele 112 F.Supp. 383
“Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of America does not make such an inhabitant a citizen of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the 14th Amendment.” – Elk v. Wilkins Neb, 5s.ct. 41, 112 US 99, 28 L. Ed. 643
“A person born in the United States has rights under this amendment [the 14th] to remain a citizen unless he voluntarily relinquishes the citizenship.” – Baker v. Rusk 236 F. Supp. 1244; Reynolds v. Haskin, C.A.A. Kan. 1925, 8 F. 2d 473
Citizen vs. CITIZEN found in the FREE PDF E-book "Covenants of the Gods" by Gregory Williams:
http://www.hisholychurch.org/printer/COGprint.pdf
George Gordon: Law Hour and Editorial Review: "Citizenship ain't all its cracked up to be":
http://georgegordon.org/audio/radio/search.lsp?r=95&q=citizen
George Gordon: Law Hour and Editorial Review: "What is a Denizen?"
http://georgegordon.org/audio/radio/search.lsp?r=95&q=Denizen
DISCLAIMER: This is not legal advice. This is for educational purposes only.
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
CITIZ
CitizenvCITIZEN
“The term ‘citizen’ is distinguishable from ‘resident’ or ‘inhabitant.’ One may be a citizen of a state without being an inhabitant, or an inhabitant without being a citizen.” -Kelm v. Carlson, C.A. Ohio, 473, F2d 1267, 1271.
“Citizenship of or in government as a person, as opposed to Natural Citizenship as an inhabitant, is a privilege granted or denied and regulated by a government, created according to the rules established by that government. If an individual wishes to join and become a person in a legal society and be governed by the rules of that society’s government, then he is legally bound to abide by the rules of that created society. He bars himself from his own liberty and becomes a surety for the debt of his benefactor.” - Gregory Williams.
"The term resident & citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by congress...an individual can be a Citizen of one of the several states without being a citizen of the United States " - US v Anthony 24 Fed. 829
And an individual may become, “a citizen of the United States without being a Citizen of a State” – Slaughter-House Cases; US v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 549
“Both before and after the 14th Amendment to the federal constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state” – US v. Cruikshank
“A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government..” – Kitchens v. Steele 112 F.Supp. 383
“Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of America does not make such an inhabitant a citizen of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the 14th Amendment.” – Elk v. Wilkins Neb, 5s.ct. 41, 112 US 99, 28 L. Ed. 643
“A person born in the United States has rights under this amendment [the 14th] to remain a citizen unless he voluntarily relinquishes the citizenship.” – Baker v. Rusk 236 F. Supp. 1244; Reynolds v. Haskin, C.A.A. Kan. 1925, 8 F. 2d 473
Citizen vs. CITIZEN found in the FREE PDF E-book "Covenants of the Gods" by Gregory Williams:
http://www.hisholychurch.org/printer/COGprint.pdf
George Gordon: Law Hour and Editorial Review: "Citizenship ain't all its cracked up to be":
http://georgegordon.org/audio/radio/search.lsp?r=95&q=citizen
George Gordon: Law Hour and Editorial Review: "What is a Denizen?"
http://georgegordon.org/audio/radio/search.lsp?r=95&q=Denizen
DISCLAIMER: This is not legal advice. This is for educational purposes only.
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
ARE Y
AreYouACommie
Are you a communist? Would you know if you were? What did Marx say communism was? He said if a civil law corporate body politic implemented into its civil laws all ten planks of his manifesto then it was a communist body politic. Communism is corporatism, it is statism, where the public economy of commerce under commercial law (UCC, admiralty/maritime, etc.) is totally regulated and controlled by the State.
ALL 14th Amendment US citizens with State Birth Certificates, Social Security Numbers, Bank Accounts, Income from employment in a occupation in commerce who attended public schools, regardless of whether they identify as Republican or Democrat or any other political, social, religious ideology, they are COMMUNISTS.
For more information I highly recommend the book, "None Dare Call It Conspiracy" by Gary Allen. See Links:
https://youtu.be/PoFVtkSkv40
https://resist.com/Onlinebooks/None_Dare_Call_It_Conspiracy.pdf
http://georgegordon.org/audio/radio/search.lsp?r=95&q=communist
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. This is for educational purposes only.
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
VIDEO
MANIT
ManitouIncline
A lowlander, an Iowan, checking off the Manitou Incline off his bucket list
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English