Newton had some unfortunate blonde moments with regards to his delusional ideas about infinity, infinitesimals, vanishing quantities and ultimate ratios. Mainstream calculus which is formulated on limits is a fraud. It would be laughable if it weren't so pathetic.
My geometric identity gives rise to a rigorous definition of the derivative and definite integral without any of the ill-formed concepts in mainstream mathematics.
The Ancient Greeks had all the mathematics they needed to realise all these concepts I discovered thousands of years later.
The ubiquitous mainstream derivative definition f'(x)= lim (as h approaches 0) f(x+h)-f(x) / h is an absolute joke and a testimony to the ignorance, stupidity and incompetence of my intellectual inferiors in the mainstream. It would be one thing if they were only intellectually deficient (which they are!), but more unfortunate is their dishonesty, jealousy and maliciousness for which there is no excuse whatsoever.
It is a shame that I will be recognised only after I am dead. I am worthy not only of one Abel prize, but of 10 Abel prizes. No one before me even came close to accomplishing what I have in the last few decades of my life.
Don't believe me you fools! Verify that what I am telling you is true. I know whereof I speak because I am a real mathematician, not a moron with a PhD in useless mythmatics.
The theorem described:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj
How it connects the derivative to the integral:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y
Seeing is believing, so download the applet and try it with any function you like:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6UNpZSEEsbG14eAFCPv8p03pv
Download my free eBook which is the most important mathematics book ever written:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VTv1tMxJgg
Number is the most important concept in mathematics. Nothing else is as important because MATHEMATICS IS THE ABSTRACT SCIENCE OF MEASURE AND NUMBER. Nothing else! Set theory, topology and group theory are NOT mathematics.
Download the best book ever written on the number concept:
https://www.academia.edu/105399167/The_Ultimate_Book_of_Numbers
Link to presentation:
https://www.academia.edu/116556934/How_to_teach_number_concept_to_teenagers
In my free eBook above, I also show you how to teach your toddler all the four basic operations!
You would not know how to do even the most basic fraction arithmetic had my Ancestors had the same shit-for-brains as contemporary mathematics academics:
https://www.academia.edu/69488136/Theory_of_fractions_from_Book_5_of_Elements_for_Dummies
Learn about the Holy Grail of Calculus:
https://www.academia.edu/105576431/The_Holy_Grail_of_Calculus
Get the true Origins and History of Calculus:
https://www.academia.edu/106488069/The_Non_fictional_Origins_and_History_of_Calculus
Discover closed -form trigonometric functions never realised before:
https://www.academia.edu/109334669/Ancient_Greek_trigonometric_formulas_better_than_anything_ever_known
Follow me on Academia.edu:
https://independent.academia.edu/JohnGabriel30
Donate here:
https://gofund.me/af8a5312
or here:
https://wise.com/pay/me/johng3933
All my YouTube videos are backed up here:
https://odysee.com/@NewCalculus:1
The scum of YouTube are constantly threatening and looking for excuses to shut down my channel.
Want to get instant updates for the newest math around? Join our discord server! https://discord.gg/CJ9Ks3WerR
Merchandise Store:
https://new-calculus.printify.me/products
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZXHe-swBO0
I solved the tangent line and area problem, no one else did! The first rigorous formulation of calculus was produced by me - no one else. The drivel you learn about in mainstream mathematics courses is full of holes.
The New Calculus is described in a collection of papers (book form):
https://www.academia.edu/41616655/An_Introduction_to_the_Single_Variable_New_Calculus
The Holy Grail of Calculus (realised FROM the New Calculus, not your fundamental increment (better adjective is 'excrement') lemma!):
https://www.academia.edu/105576431/The_Holy_Grail_of_Calculus
The Holy Grail works FOR ANY FUNCTION. You can test using the following applets because most of you are initially too stupid to understand and you need to study a lot:
Applet used in this video:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pKJnmCkPfmq1JykpGJaqdyMYjMsLBlxa
For derivative:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6UNpZSEEsbG14eAFCPv8p03pv
For integral:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JYRxjGb3MxlYWp_2KqVXwXNr5XUvUNz7
The applets are free with the given links above. They are designed to be used by morons - like most of you.
Copy and download this information now because day is coming when they will shut down this channel. Just a matter of time.
MY (with emphasis on MY) Geometric theorem of January 2020:
https://www.academia.edu/62358358/My_historic_geometric_theorem_of_January_2020
Download the following free eBooks which are your textbooks if you want to become a REAL MATHEMATICIAN, not just another stupid moron like your mainstream mathematics professor or mathematics teacher - they are infinitely stupid compared to my level of intelligence. Yes, I am literally a GENIUS.
Don't waste your time reading the drivel of thousands of textbooks published by asswipes called mathematics professors or teachers. Get the FACTS here with respect to origins and history of calculus:
https://www.academia.edu/106488069/The_Non_fictional_Origins_and_History_of_Calculus
Learn for the first time in your sorry lives what it means to be a "number" in mathematics:
https://www.academia.edu/105399167/The_Ultimate_Book_of_Numbers
Become a follower here:
https://independent.academia.edu/JohnGabriel30
Donate here:
https://gofund.me/af8a5312
Want to get instant updates for the newest math around? Join our discord server! https://discord.gg/CJ9Ks3WerR
Merchandise Store:
https://new-calculus.printify.me/products
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3aTrUydaA4
So, using your bullshit concept of "piecewise" function, I show you that to apply the fundamental theorem, you need to have a function that is smooth over a given interval. Continuity is INSUFFICIENT, you fucking idiots! Why? Because the tangent line is a geometric object that determines a curve's
smoothness. It came long before your bullshit definition of derivative. Your mainstream math professors are fucking imbeciles who don't know shit about mathematics, never mind calculus.
Want to get instant updates for the newest math around? Join our discord server! https://discord.gg/CJ9Ks3WerR
Merchandise Store:
https://new-calculus.printify.me/products
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woNsys8kWBo
This is the first of three videos on arithmetic with magnitudes in geometry.
There are two main ways of representing ratios.
1. As line segments (magnitudes of any kind will do) separated by a colon
2. As sides of a triangle (proportional ratios are found from similar triangles)
A ratio is literally nothing more than a comparison of two magnitudes. For example, if we write ____ : _________ , this means we are comparing the line lengths that appear on either side of the colon. The comparison is a means of identifying the line that appears BEFORE the colon (called the antecedent) using the line that appears AFTER the colon (called the consequent). This is purely a matter of convention. The antecedent and consequent are called aliquot parts of the ratio. We cannot talk about the properties or anything else with respect to ____, unless we have something to compare it against.
Euclid defined ratio as follows (Book V, Def.3):
Λόγος ἐστὶ δύο μεγεθῶν ὁμογενῶν ἡ κατὰ πηλικότητά ποια σχέσις.
Thomas Heath translated it incorrectly as:
A ratio is a certain type of condition with respect to size of two magnitudes of the same kind.
Heath's translation is just a bunch of baloney. Heath did not understand what was being said which is not surprising because like most mainstream math academics, Heath had no clue what the number concept meant.
Here is the correct translation:
A ratio is about the quotientness (πηλικότητά) of two homogenous magnitudes.
There is no English equivalent for the Greek word πηλικότητά, so I made up the word "quotientness".
Euclid writes "ποια σχέσις" meaning "what relationship" or "quotientness".
This means that given any ratio, the most important aspect is whether or not the antecedent and consequent parts (called aliquot parts) have a common measure or divisor. Aliquot means part of another whole.
This property of having a common measure is called quotientness. There are two possibilities - either the aliquot parts have a common measure or they do not. Can you think of examples?
1:2 has the property of quotientness.
circumference : diameter does NOT have the property of quotientness.
In geometry it does not matter if the ratios have quotientness or not, because every ratio has the property of proportion with innumerably many other proportional ratios.
Using the scheme described above, we can find any proportional ratio using a parallel line which adjusts the aliquot parts as it moves between the vertical and horizontal lines.
The concept of measure arises once we choose a "unit" ratio, that is, any ratio whose aliquot parts are equal and assumed as the basis of identifying the antecedent of any other ratio.
Since any such ratio
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sznfB7A8fEc
Measure theory is a joke. The mainstream mathematics community have never understood the concept of number.
Get a glimpse into my genius mind and learn why you are so intellectually inferior to me:
https://www.academia.edu/103388933/Reason_behind_Ratio
A New Calculus student compiled this video. All I did was add the music to it.
Here is the Reddit link where my student tried to reason with mainstream mathematics BABOONS and how he was treated:
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathematics/comments/195r2kr/on_what_grounds_do_people_oppose_john_gabriels
The text can be found here for those not wishing to watch the video:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240114144749/https://cl1p.net/new_calculus_a_video_1
For many decades I have argued in vain with the prize apes of mainstream mathematics, pointing out their errors and stupidity. I was under no illusion that my student was going to be received differently - especially on a garbage site like Reddit where I have been libeled for decades by utter imbeciles such as mainstream mathematics professors, teachers and their brainwashed morons.
I can never bring myself to respect these incorrigibly stupid and vile bastards that have crossed my path. They are wood for the fire - all of them are worthless scum.
The Ultimate Book of Numbers:
https://www.academia.edu/105399167/The_Ultimate_Book_of_Numbers
The Holy Grail of Calculus:
https://www.academia.edu/105576431/The_Holy_Grail_of_Calculus
The Non-fiction origins and History of Calculus:
https://www.academia.edu/106488069/The_Non_fictional_Origins_and_History_of_Calculus
The New Calculus will become mainstream because it is the FIRST RIGOROUS formulation in human history. Your children and grandchildren will be laughing at your utter ignorance and stupidity, you reptiles!
Every one of you who has opposed me, I hope you suffer an agonising death, you vile, rotten scum!
Become a follower on Academia.edu:
https://independent.academia.edu/JohnGabriel30
Donate here:
https://gofund.me/af8a5312
Want to get instant updates for the newest math around? Join our discord server! https://discord.gg/CJ9Ks3WerR
Merchandise Store:
https://new-calculus.printify.me/products
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1Oojhbylg8
Discovery of my historic geometric theorem in January 2020:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj
The above theorem is hated by mainstream academia because it exposes their ignorance on an unprecedented scale. The embarrassment to insecure mainstream academics is so severe that they censor me whenever possible.
Link to applet that demonstrates this theorem for any smooth function:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6UNpZSEEsbG14eAFCPv8p03pv
How this theorem inspired by my New Calculus (first rigorous formulation)
led to a second rigorous formulation of differential and integral calculus:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y
Download the most important mathematics book ever written for free:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO
All my videos are backed up to LBRY.tv in case YT decides to ban me again at some future time. Study my work. I do know better than any other human.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uxR8C3_9HY
My historic geometric theorem of January 2020:
https://www.academia.edu/62358358/My_historic_geometric_theorem_of_January_2020
The New Calculus - an introduction:
https://www.academia.edu/41616655/An_Introduction_to_the_Single_Variable_New_Calculus
Learn how we got numbers and arithmetic (ALL operations) from geometry:
https://www.academia.edu/44820487/Discovering_the_concept_of_number_a_personal_journey
Mainstream academics suffer from mental syphilis to the extent that they do not understand the very theory they teach:
https://www.academia.edu/81300370/Mainstream_mathematics_academics_are_arrogant_and_incorrigible_ignoramuses_The_mean_value_theorem_IS_the_fundamental_theorem_of_calculus
Learn 6 simple reasons why limit theory is flawed and has no part in calculus:
https://www.academia.edu/79881709/Six_simple_reasons_why_the_mainstream_derivative_definition_of_calculus_is_flawed
Thank me for enlightening you and fighting a battle against far more powerful and evil entities that you can imagine:
https://gofund.me/af8a5312
Summary:
1. x/x can only be interpreted as 1, nothing else. It's absurd to even think that there is a possibility of 0/0 which is meaningless.
2. Multiplying f(x) by x/x does not change its properties or values.
3. Multiplying f(x) by x/x also means that f(x) can be divided by x/x.
4. One cannot substitute non-numbers such as the placeholder called 0 in symbolic values. Imagine if the unbelievably smart Ancient Greeks thought of 0 as a number - you would have had no arithmetic, no algebra and no mathematics, you ignorant morons! Zero has its place in mathematics as a placeholder. Zero is decidedly not a number of any kind because zero measures NOTHING. Study my article on how a genius discovers the number concept - See link above.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SInecGQ8KoM