Podcast One: The Pulse - Liu Xiaobo's death, Hongkongers identity & 4 legislators disqualified | 2017-07-15
On Christmas Day, 2009, Liu Xiaobo was sentenced to 11 years imprisonment and two years deprivation of political rights for “inciting subversion of state power”. Two days before his sentence, he wrote his “I Have No Enemies: My Final Statement”. It was intended to be read out in court but he was not allowed to finish reading it. A year later, Liu Xiaobo was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. His death on Thursday made him the second winner of that prize to die in captivity. The first, Carl von Ossietzky, who was awarded the prize in 1935, also died in hospital while detained by the Nazi regime. Like Liu, he had been banned from collecting the award himself. Governments and organisations around the world had pleaded for Liu to be allowed to leave China for treatment. Here in Hong Kong, pro-Beijing lawmakers refused to allow his plight to even be debated in Legco, and Chief Executive Carrie Lam said it’s not her role to exert “pressure” on the central government over Liu’s fate. Coverage of Liu Xiaobo’s death in China has been muted. On social media, messages saying “RIP” or even showing candle emojis are being deleted. With me in the studio is William Nee, China Researcher at Amnesty International Hong Kong.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping came to town two weeks ago to mark the 20th anniversary of the Handover, he laid down red lines Hong Kong should not cross. He said that, on day-to-day matters, we must “be guided by a strong sense of “one country”, and firmly observe the principle of “one country””. Any attempt to endanger China’s sovereignty and security and challenge the power of the central government is “an act that crosses the red line, and is absolutely impermissible.” The president’s hard line and incidents such as the treatment of Liu Xiaobo and other dissidents continue to unnerve many Hongkongers, some of whom are planning to leave, but many mainlanders Hong Kong are keen to live here as they the SAR as a land of opportunity.
In her fourth Policy Address delivered last week, Chief Executive Carrie Lam dedicated a lengthy chapter to upholding “One Country, Two Systems” and stressed the need for constitutional order. She said that to fully implement the concept formulated by former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, requires strict adherence to the Constitution and the Basic Law. Mrs Lam reiterated that there can be no challenge to rulings by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on implementation of the Basic law.
The Joint Declaration, signed in 1984, set out a set of a range of principles which were to remain unchanged for 50 years after 1997.There are different interpretations of how that has worked out and to get the British point of view I am pleased to welcome Andrew Heyn, who is winding up his role as British Consul General to Hong Kong and Macao this week.
The attack on former Ming Pao chief editor Kevin Lau this week has increased concerns about Hong Kong press freedom and freedom of speech. According to his surgeons, Kevin Lau received six knife or chopper wounds, on his shoulders, back and both legs. The open wounds on his back and legs were the most severe. During his period as editor, the paper had strongly featured such incidents as the suspicious death of Chinese dissident Li Wangyang, Hong Kong’s protests against the introduction of national education, and the denial of a licence to HKTV. He had also playe a role in investigating the offshore funds of important mainland officials and their families.
In the wake of that attack, many journalists are feeling that the concerns expressed in last Sunday’s march for press freedom, which we also examine this week, have only been confirmed.
Emigration from Hong Kong seems to be on the increase again, with more people seeing Taiwan, Canada, and the united States as options offering bluer skies, more breathable air, and fewer political fears. The number of emigrants for the first half of 2013 was 3,900, 8.3% higher than for the same period the year before. Meanwhile more mainland Chinese are seeing Hong Kong as an attractive place to move their families, but they are also going to United States, Canada, and Australia, among other places.
Hello and welcome to a new season of The Pulse. On Tuesday, the day before delivering her maiden Policy Address, Chief Executive Carrie Lam released her self-assessed report card on her first 100 days in office. The 12-page document set the tone for what was to come the next day. She said the Address was to be “a new beginning” and hoped it would mark “new starting points” for many areas in Hong Kong.
Following the Address on Wednesday, a survey conducted by Hong Kong University’s Public Opinion Programme found that 48% of respondents were satisfied with the Policy Address, 14% were not. Overall, on a scale of 0-100, respondents gave the Address a 62.4 score.
That's it from us for this week. And just to update you - from now on, the first run of The Pulse is on RTHK 31 every Saturday at 6pm with a repeat on Sunday at 6:30am. If you prefer to watch on demand, via the RTHK website you can still catch us there or on our Facebook page – where you will find both streaming video and podcasts – or you can give RTHK’s mobile Apps a go. Wherever you catch us, we’ll see you next week. Goodbye.
This week, legislators, some of them anyway, debated a motion to urge the Central Government to release Nobel Peace prize winner Liu Xiaobo and all political dissidents. The predictable faces, and voices, were noticeable by their absence, although they did return to vote the motion down. Rather more widely discussed, and more popular with even pro-Beijing legislators, was a motion by the DAB’s Chan Hak-kan to develop a more animal friendly policy in Hong Kong.
On Tuesday, British Prime Minister Teresa May faced an unprecedentedly crushing defeat in the House of Commons. Her Brexit deal which sets out the terms under which Britain might leave the European Union was rejected by 230 votes. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn tried to capitalise on this with a motion of no confidence in the government. However this manoeuvre was defeated with the help of Mrs May’s Northern Ireland allies, the DUP who dislike Mr Corbyn even more than the government – so she survived but only with a margin of 19 votes. Parliament however has forced her to come back with another exit plan by the 21st. So what does all this mean for Britain? With us to talk about that are Martin Chung, Assistant Professor of the Dept. of Govt. & International Studies at the Baptist University and John Bruce, Chairman of the Scottish Business Group of the British Chamber of Commerce Hong Kong.
According to a report from the European Commission released last year, an average Hong Kong person consumes almost 103 kg of pork, beef, poultry and other meat every year. It’s one of the highest per capita intakes in the world, higher than Europe and the United States. And it’s fed by a sizeable daily movement of live pigs across the border that’s now threatened by an outbreak of African swine fever across the mainland. Worried for the health of their own livestock, Hong Kong’s 43 pig farmers have urged the government to stop the highly contagious virus coming here.
Hong Kong doesn’t have squatter villages on the hillsides any more but more than 10,000 people are now living in dismal cubicle homes in industrial buildings. Why? Well, there isn’t enough public housing, and rents in these buildings are 20% to 30% lower than in residential buildings. There are close to 1,500 old industrial buildings scattered around industrial areas in places like Tai Kok Tsui, Kwun Tong, San Po Kong, Cheung Sha Wan and Tsuen Wan. In the past few years, many of Hong Kong’s needy have had to resort to living in the cheapest accommodation they can find: cubicles, lacking basic facilities, in these industrial buildings.
In Hong Kong, you are, in the normal, run of things, eligible to apply for Permanent Resident status. Job description usually doesn’t matter … unless you have been working as a domestic helper. In that case, you can have been here for twenty years or thirty years and still not be eligible. Now some are arguing that under the provisions of the Basic Law this amounts to job discrimination.
Just two days before Sunday’s election of the 1,200-member chief executive election committee, Chief Executive Leung Chung-ying has announced he will not run for a second term. Mr Leung cited family reasons for his decision. To put it mildly, his announcement came as a surprise. The Central Government’s Liaison Office in Hong Kong said in a statement on Friday afternoon that it “fully understands and respects” the decision and expressed its “deep regret”. Mr Leung, nicknamed 689 for the number of votes he received when he was appointed to office, has proved to be the most divisive and controversial of Hong Kong’s three Chief Executives. Under his watch divisions in Hong Kong have clearly increased. But what comes next? So far the only prominent figure to declare a definite interest in running for the post is retired judge Woo Kwok-hing, but it seems highly likely that the Chair of the New People’s Party Regina Ip will announce her candidacy next Thursday.
With us in the studio are Civic Party leader Alvin Yeung, legislator Paul Tse and political commentator, Chris Yeung.
In part two, Chris Yeung of the Hong Kong Economic Journal talks to us about Leung Chun-ying's cabinet, and about some of the challenges he faces, including a considerable credibility gap.