At this point, @SurveillanceReport and @Techlore have become the fast food of privacy channels: empty calories and very little nutritional value, if any.
@Techlore @TheNewOil @SurveillanceReport @robbraxmantech @TheHatedOne @SwitchedtoLinux @MentalOutlaw @DistroTube
To be fair, if @surveillancereport:2 would simply add caveats to their recommendations maybe people wouldn't be as critical.
@techlore:3 @RobBraxmanTech:6 @switchedtolinux:0 @thenewoil:7 @DistroTube:2 @AlphaNerd:8
Yes, @techlore:3 is technically right and I admit it. HOWEVER, it's not that Session hasn't implemented it yet, as Techlore is implying, but there's reasoning why it's not being implemented. I highly encourage you to read the linked article rather than taking Techlore at his word....whatever his word is even worth.
Article: https://getsession.org/session-protocol-explained
@techlore:3 @AlphaNerd:8 @DistroTube:2 @surveillancereport:2 @switchedtolinux:0 @RobBraxmanTech:6 @TheHatedOne:1