In this video you will see data from the NYT feed from PA on November fourth.
In this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day (see image link below):
https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds
A total of nine exhibits are presented in this video, but there are in fact several hundred of these precincts seizures and ratio transfers on the day of November 4th alone, and the same ratios continue to be transferred for several more days within the overall dataset spanning an entire week.
Original data sets:
https://gofile.io/d/qZcQl6
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIlI46HdqKg
This is the Layman's explanation of what I discovered in Atlanta. I present to you, the Great Wheel of Georgia.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5FShKVjRdk
Maricopa Paper (reduced version of the Michigan Paper)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f5cgmSW3tUJfOI6ijU4Dm6eArdUm9tngOab_rRjMkr8/edit?usp=sharing
Oakland County Recorder Data
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iNAkGavumvvDjKBNABH7T4S5FIUohDlsq1kLPUybIPU/edit?usp=sharing
Macomb County Recorder Data
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dzobdIuV7WC7JjqIVky7aCJ3tfpaJz8VcnQBYY1Vjgw/edit?usp=sharing
Basic Michigan Algorithm:
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/8ibu8ydios
f(x) = reflection line; z(x) = proportion of Mail-ins to Election Day Votes, 2000 MiV votes to 1000 EDV votes means z(x) = 2
b1(x) = Biden EDV%; t2(x) = TrumpMIV %
b2(x) = Biden Miv%; t1(x) = Trump EDV%
The algorithm solves as t2 as a function of b1.
(t1 is implied by b1, regardless of whether or not the election is or isn't fair, since t1 is always equal to 100%-b1).
(b2 is implied by t1, regardless of whether or not the election is or isn't fair, since b2 is always equal to 100%-t1).
a(x) = Biden's Aggregate Percentage for the entire precinct.
Since b1(x), b2(x), t1(x), t2(x) and a(x) are all forced, one only needs the reflection constant and lambda and the predetermined aggregate a(x) to generate both candidates percentages for both the MiV and EDV.
The intersection of the line x = k, (k bounded from 0 to 1) with all five percentage functions are the percentages of the candidate's. If a desired value of a(x) exists between 0% and 100% from x bounded from 0 to 1, then the algorithm simply reads the values of the functions b1(x), b2(x), t1(x) and t2(x) and multiples those percentages against the respective vote totals and generates the Tabulation Record.
If a(x) does not exist, either the proportion z(x) must be increased, or the reflection line f(x) must be decreased.
We note that at z(x) = 3 and f(x) = 0.25, that a(x) cannot drop below 50%, guaranteeing a victory for the candidate, even if they get 0% of the election day vote; thus one only requires a 3:1 ratio of MiV ballots to EDV ballots to guarantee a victory at the precinct, since if b1(x) = 0% EDV then b2(x) = 66.667%, MIV therefore the aggregate of 0% and 66.667% at a ratio of 3 MIV to 1 EDV ballot is an aggregate that exceeds 50%.
Macomb County Recorder Website:
https://electionresults.macombgov.org/m31/results.html
Thesis Paper:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jj9ASctIWDhcpesR8d3r-qj9Ez6uxIIsFfxgkuNJgZE/edit?usp=sharing
Source Video for the Derivation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5o2kUjevUA
Michigan Engine (link is safe ignore warning):
https://gofile.io/d/leCtNM
Fair Reflection Test:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uMaoCdoGbNpm25fODpgnM6T497r8QQoWP0UJ9Az6uEY/edit?usp=sharing
Unfair Reflection Test
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q3xczUxTAw3CCzrviZyitNplwxbPCMGohKz
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jd3vPhH_MK8
Breaking the Wheel,
The starting files.
https://gofile.io/d/jJ9Ugy
https://gofile.io/d/wOBXnC
------------------------------------------------------
Current state of logicboard file:
https://gofile.io/d/npV6hl
---------------------------------------------------
The Wheel Number of 1485 passed as a solution to an inverse floor function for a dataset of over 3000 entries... and only had 1 in 73 quintillion chance of passing (since there were 66 data points to which we could have added 1 to Trump's vote and it would have failed), ie 1/(2^66). This result was for the first Tensor.
---------------------------------------------------
The Wheel Number of 2481 passed as solution to an inverse Floor Function for the Second Tensor.
Current state of the research.
https://gofile.io/d/Fvx3PV
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv5GGo9Ja2A
This video will demonstrate how to measure the difference between a fair and an unfair election, where an unfair election is an election where the result is predetermined algorithmically. At the very core of this article lay the assumption of Causality, that the Effect cannot precede the Cause; likewise, the Aggregate Percentage of a Candidate cannot precede the Election Day and the Mail-in Percentages of that candidate. In a fair election, the aggregate cannot be known until after all ballots are cast; in an election that is unfair, where the aggregate was predetermined, the aggregate becomes the cause and the Mail-in Vote (and/or the Election Day Vote) becomes the effect...and the laws of mathematics allow us to readily discern between which was the cause...and which was the effect.
To Paraphrase Immanuel Kant: “The causation is the thing without which, is a condition of possibility of a thing, and so it is satisfied in the thing.” The aggregate is not a condition of possibility for the Mail-in votes number. The Aggregate is a Concept that relates two things. People vote by mail and people vote at the polls on election day, but no one, to my knowledge, has voted by aggregate.
The content of this article transcends mere elections, these principles can be applied to detect financial fraud on Wall Street, reveal bogus claims from engineered studies and even to expose an entire body of manufactured evidence to support a scientific hypothesis.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f5cgmSW3tUJfOI6ijU4Dm6eArdUm9tngOab_rRjMkr8/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gwHAq5N_hgGoIIdh8b94nxA2VcYzBOAVG_3283DW0dc/edit?usp=sharing
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxdFABvhcsE
Supermarathon Mod: Simple resign to ground combat using functions that the stock AI understands.
Current Game
Axeman 5 strength, counters spearman.
Spearman 4 strength, counter chariot
Chariot 4 strengh, counters axeman.
The solution is simple. Only make axeman because it has the highest base strength with only 3-4 spearmen escorting.
Bloodlust Mod; SO SIMPLE THE UNMODDED AI GETS IT
Axeman 5 strength, counters melee. No free promos or first strikes or bonuses asides from +50% vs melee. Limited to 12 axemen.
75 hammers. Does not require bronze, but gets a 33% production bonus with bronze/iron
Spearman 4 strength. Immune to all collateral/first strike.
Limited to 18 spearmen
75 hammers. Does not require bronze, but gets a 50% production bonus with bronze.
Chariot 4 strength, counters melee and siege (except spearman with negative combat bonus to spears). Has baseline 60% withdrawal chance. Deals collateral damage to one extra unit, collateral can kill.
Limited to 6 chariots
100 hammers, functions as mobile artillery that can kill.
Does not require horses, but gets a 50% production bonus with horse.
Catapult, 5 strength, cannot reduce any unit's health below 80% of it's base value. Therefore, 100 catapults will never reduce a single axemen below 4 strength.
UNLIMITED IN NUMBER
Does not require stone, but gets a 25% production bonus with stone. 50 hammers.
Tier 2 archer (obsidian arrow tips): 4 strength archer. 15% withdrawal chance. Does 25% extra to spears and axemen. 1 First strike + 1 chance at first strike.
UNLIMITED IN NUMBER. 25 hammers.
Requires Walls before being built.
Tier 2 Warrior (Shielded Warrior). 5 strength, 10% withdrawl chance. 25% hills attack. One chance at first strike. UNLIMITED IN NUMBER. 20 hammers. Prefers to attack Axemen. 25%+ City Attack
Walls = Flat 25% Defense, cannot be bombarded down.
SIEGE TOWER: . 20 Strength, Negative 200% City Defense, Positive 1000% City Attack. Immune to collateral. 1 First Strike. Medic 1,2 and 3. Has Blitz, Sentry and March. Two moves (to utilize blitz). Guaranteed to bleed out unprepared turtling opponent.
LIMITED TO TWO SIEGE TOWERS
1000 hammers. -200% Attack vs Siege Tower.
Raider: 5 strength unit, counters catapults. 3 moves, ignores terrain cost, invisible, hidden nationality. Can only be seen by chariots and scouts. Can be used by both sides to stop reinforcing catapults that are unescorted and/or pillage deep within enemy territory when the Siege Tower initates war on the front.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOmzBD6BHJo
For Jon Randazzo: This is the exposition of the Organ/Trombone duet. Tomorrow, I start the development, where all of themes are explored, modulated and interchanged.
First Theme: Starlight Visage, Time Signature = 3/4
Second Theme: Dance of Death Time Signature = 4/2
Third Theme: Elohim (burrows from the codetta of the first theme) 4/2 then 3/2
Fourth Theme: The Grave Digger Time Signature = 5/2
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRMYY2eL534