https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1gXYSB5HIs&list=PLyIHyU7xRYB2VXnibVpygDGvmfRKW9mvD&index=7&pp=gAQBiAQB
Decades later he recalls new details how it was not the Dakota doorman as heard here who fingered Mark Chapman, in death of John Lennon, it was according again to former NYC Policeman Steve Spiro, Chapman himself in a later interview, who had confessed previously at the scene.
Oh, is that how it happened? So, Spiro would answer also personal letters from Chapman addressed to him partly so, that we could get more info from the suspect himself in what was motive, and at the same time he all these years evidently held back on personal comments giving info on guilt spoken allegedly from the mouth of the man arrested, charged, and sentenced. Doesn't make a lot of comprehensive sense, now does, it?
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7emwl4qd2o4
Manson family co- prosecutor Stephen Kay gives us his best Beavis and Butthead impression while attempting to explain away the insufficient evidence that the Manson family conspired to get away with murder by diverting attention via a clever scheme which would imply much larger ramifications of a race war, in their alleged murders at the residences of the Tate- Polasnski's and La Bianca's. Only, to err, in their judgment of the neighborhoods' racial demographics, in which, it is said they planted a wallet, stolen allegedly, from the infamous crime scene.
Also, notice that the original evidence of the phrase' War' carved into Leno La Bianca's torso was spelled with a Freemason's square and compass juxtaposed, creating the shape of the Letter W. [Found @2:09] :Making it more clear as to why fellow Manson prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi whited out the victims in the images of the crime scenes released in his book, Helter Skelter. And the Reelz channel who even reenacts this scene, although, still keeping it as a normal W. Also Tex Watson has admitted to being the one who carved the phrase in La Bianca's side, and not, Patricia Krenwinkel, as stated here.
In the full episode, Manson says that Tex Watson was perfect, and he was a soldier. Albert Pike wrote about number symbolism that the number 8 is perfect. The night they set out to was August 8th, which is 8-8, and when the murders allegedly happened, it was into the 9th, which Pike also writes, is representing destruction. Is that what Charlie was alluding to when he said in recent years, that Tex Watson was perfect, and that he was a soldier?
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du91iOHUAXo
Short clip of American Heroes channels' new 2018 special, "Mafia Versus JFK". It starts off with the erroneous claim that JFK was hit by three shots. This excludes a missed shot that we know wounded bystander, James Tague, proving that there was at least one more shot fired than the amount which wounded President Kennedy and Texas Governor John Connally. With the official conclusion of one shooter who fired three shots while leaving three rifle shells adjacent to the alleged snipers window, along with the acceptance of the single bullet theory there are no more credibly accounted for projectiles to wound Kennedy three times. That, however depends on whether one is working from the standard assumptions, or like Robert Blakey, who is prominently featured throughout the entire show has stated over and over that a rogue, secondary mafia endorsed sniper fired at least one shot at John Kennedy from the grassy knoll on Elm street, a location below and west of the Texas Book Depository.
Furthermore, extremely credible medical professionals including Physicist and MD David Mantik have explained that JFK was most likely hit by at least three projectiles in his cranium alone. And we know according to the official theory that includes the endorsement of the SBT, at least one shot wounded both the Governor and the President and the admittance of one more additional bullet that led to the minor wound to bystander Tague's chin, which is left unaccounted for. yet his wound was the main catalyst of a need to use a single bullet hypothesis to explain away the discrepancy of total wounds with that of the previously cemented idea of one shooter with the shots fired. Or maybe instead, this is Blakey's belated admittance subtly revealed only under the cover of his patented mafia revenge theory?
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzvzfYt32po
Will Nikolas J. Cruz alone go on trial for the contrasting details of the once initially said victims who were shot and died outdoors, to the later revelation that essentially no persons were shot outside of the MSD high school crime scene, with one teacher shot inside of the stairwell, who allegedly fell dead only one step outside the exterior stair entrance.
However, within the first few days after the shooting.the once Sheriff Scott Israel, was still discussing how the shot outside victims perfectly fits the timeline, one even according to the then Sheriff Israel, shot outside the schools fenced perimeter, while standing at a street intersection.
Former MSD student Kayden Hanafi, who was a freshman that V-day, and was led safely out of adjacent Bldg. 13, in doing so, he immediately recalled to CNN's Jake tapper how he saw two bodies under yellow tarps, seen outside the Freshman Building, or 1200.
Meanwhile that very same day the sheriff himself told the New York Times how one victim was shot outside the campus, on a nearby street.
Here Israel is directly questioned about the victims shot outside the 1200 building - https://youtu.be/Z85HRrktSQw?t=621 - in an ABC live feed the following day.
The official MSD shooting report released by the public safety commission reads that essentially no persons were shot outside of Bldg. 12, and, that aside from Coach Aaron Feis, who took one step outside the stair entrance before perishing, no one else died outside of the building, the alleged scene of the crime.
If these were extra bodies and were not moved, then they must've been part of a drill, and literally got up and walked away, so, who else should be culpable in this crime along with Cruz, and former Deputy Peterson, for also allowing a rogue shooter into a scene of a staged law enforcement drill?
And if these victims seen laying outside on the on the ground unattended were true deaths, then who else should be on trial for covering up just how these persons did die?
Did Nikolas J. Cruz come upon MSD right at the moment of a planned drill - is that why campus monitor Medina and others did not initially respond with a Code Red call, over the radio?
We know other interconnected institutions to the later events were undergoing drills that day. The day of the shooting with these now changed stories of perhaps three deaths, or maybe the female student under the tarp and the victim the sheriff reported outside the school each then later got up and walked away as part of these heavily rumored drills.
Then the same exact scenario of a planned drill for an Active Shooter situation was undergoing at the same two exact trauma centers at the two hospitals which ALL of the injured, but surviving, were taken to. So, that when the 16 revealed here, instead o
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdqvYEdPF6s
This early version of the students video diaries also proves how, the statement which seems as if Samantha Grady said she revisited the location of terror in Building12, has, in fact been artificially crafted, again by CNN.
Simply follow the caption transcript when Samantha Grady speaks starting @1:19, to interpret how it is the unedited admission of what she did on the morning which school resumed at Parkland's MSD high school. As compared to this later more heavily edited phrasing seen here--https://youtu.be/bIiCZwJLrFk?t=84
The last phrase before her words get changed are, ..."I was kind of lost, what to do".
After that line, CNN changed the rest.
However, this clip also reveals a very strange admission also made by Grady, which CNN would also support in the making of a graphic overlain with her words that it was a miracle that she was not shot. Heard and seen in transcript @1:34 mark and on...
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jYzCVkuPNs
Before the name of the suspected murders in the case of John Lennon had been publicly announced , the wife of the mystery Caucasian man detained had formally decided that her husband visiting NYC was indeed the culprit-no questions asked. But, nonetheless, she still loves him and openly professes this to her murderous husband. Til death do them part, she couldn't wait and helped railroad him in life.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzehBRJrN9w
And not the shattered bone that nearly all Specter's own sycophants plus, critics of Specter's theory, unanimously concur that the old official story is that Texas Governor John Connally had at least two bones broken by the impact of at least one speeding bullet.
With additional editing of a computer simulated path of 'the magic bullet' as performed by the production of 'Inside the Warren Commission' (2023) on PBS.
So, Specter had even verbally altered the chest wound to John Connally by as early as, the printing of the WCR itself. But, while of course the report does not dictate anywhere throughout that the rib bone was merely grazed by a passing bullet, instead, the report duly notes how a section of the rib bone of Connally was pulverized. It is sometimes told that Governor Connally had a second rib that also was damaged by presumably the same bullet. A bullet which is heard here in this clip from 2023 how it has "minor blemishes", so, if one of the accepted of only two bones officially damaged inside of Connally, if one is later described as having only sustained a graze of a bullet, not a direct blow, then wouldn't that correlate back to the projectile which only sustained damage to itself in a minor degree? Recall, Specter here says at the start that the bullet, CE-399, had slowed drastically.
Now, where have we also been hearing that very same line by a living person as of 2023? Oh yes, why that would be the very latest spokesman for yet another Magic Bullet, former U.S. Secret Service agent Paul Landis.
In the end here we are left with as Specter deems it, a 'single bullet conclusion' that when compared to the wounds as described in thee WCR do not completely match with the story which Specter took with him across the nation in appearances of public discussion.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyIHyU7xRYB08vR4gjU-CvaELP750uNrK
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gN4t2ZXV8WE
Fauci would predict his own viral wildfire very much in mirror to the earlier CNN special, 'election and conspiracy' coverage on Trump, where Fareed Zakaria likened the early stages of the SARS Corona-2 epidemic to the Chinese communist revolution, all started by a single spark. https://youtu.be/tRDBGWSpvjs
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyIHyU7xRYB1GPYWyO716_byFsDJc6sBW
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNVOXG6LQqw