There was only one series of eleven episodes. 1965 to 2019 is 54 years. Saying some frequency from space is doing whatever's obviously idiotic so can be "read through", TV's come quite some way since this publication but my information is that there's Masonic clues in it which are so rare as to not be picked up by normal Masons let alone anyone else. Apparently that person'd never seen two handshakes in public every before being one of these aspects which would generally denote its importance. Undermind Series Overview Undermind is a science fiction television drama produced by ABC Weekend Television in 1965. It ran for eleven episodes of sixty minutes each. It starred Rosemary Nicols, Jeremy Wilkin and Denis Quilley. The series was devised by Shoestring and Bergerac creator Robert Banks Stewart, who also went on to write for Doctor Who. Several other writers known for their work on Who also contributed scripts: David Whitaker, Bill Strutton and Robert Holmes. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScXV8hasLPs

... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXN8jGhgLaY

Friday 02.09.16, 17.45 Hiscox do underwrite certain NHS areas, but they work through a broker and the it's only them and the named policy holder who they're allowed to deal (according to them, but I don't see how as there's a central complaints service in Manchester and London from what I can tell, so not one for each area, as initially I got put through to Manchester). I am enquiring as a result of NHS England's central London team being informed of criminality and civil wrongs related to denial of service relating to Stanley Richardson since he caught Helena O'Driscoll out falsifying his medical records on camera and her colluding with PC Chris Parker of the Hillingdon Metropolitan Police Service and other officers, colluding to fit him up in an attempt to Pervert the Course of Justice, with regards previous criminality which Stanley Richards has gathered compelling evidence of. Helen Green is the Southcote Surgery's manager. service@hiscox.co.uk ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsxIguvHcnQ

Dear Viewers, Re: CIRCULAR MARXIST SUBVERSION TECHNIQUES UNVEILED IN THE UK FORENOTE: This subject is complicated. It is deliberately made that way. The only way for me, as I write today, to be able to begin to articulate myself, is to get on with it, then listen back to myself, and correct any ambiguities. THIS IS AN ITERATIVE PROCESS in other words. Skipping this iterative step too difficult for to do me at this juncture in time, as I am still learning. It is beyond me, at this point, to separate all of the points made, putting them into neat, little bundles of discreet info.. Your help in criticising, detracting and confirming, is all the more important with this in mind. THE 'AIM' OF SUBVERSIVE TECHNIQUES OF THIS TYPE: The primary aim is not to have a fixed aim. A set of set ideas, governing the desired effect must never be put above the underlying premise that confusion, chaos and marginalization, depression and subjugation of the active/onlooking players in any target experimental arena, must always be put first. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Corrections/disambiguations (21.12.13) 2min: Whilst discussing the trick to convince people that there was a miscarriage of justice in a council tax dispute, which was allegedly down to Roger Hayes not having been given proof of a contract existing, amongst other things, the ensuing bankruptcy hearing/announcement was used to gather up a large number of people who were mislead into thinking that this was a council tax trial. From the stories that I heard from the BCG and the UKC, the issue was that if the judge was on his oath, he had sworn to protect the people and not a corporation. However, this was not the correct venue, as Roger had already not paid. He was already far, far down the road, and that issue was in the past tense, for whatever reason. I have to make this clear, as when I mentioned a fine or prison, I erroneously linked it to bankruptcy by accident; proving I suppose that it's a complicated subject with all of the facets, mixed together. Obviously, whilst misleading in my presentation, confusion by making things convoluted is the very tactic of Brian Gerrish and Roger Hayes, whilst an immoral low life, is very much a tool, and in that, a victim of Gerrish. So, please don't let my lack of articulation of a deliberately confusing subject confuse you. I meant to say council tax resulting in either a fine (leading to bankruptcy) or prison. That had already happened at this point. The conclusion drawn that he had not paid, so he was now being made bankrupt. At 11min10: I keep referring to witnesses. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zd0-mX6y4D8