Andrew Ashworth, Bill Maloney, Chris Fay, Ian Puddick, and Tom Watson M.P SET ME UP WITH THIS INTERVIEW TO DISCREDIT ME, AND MY PHONE TAPPING EVIDENCE. This was all to get me into trouble, so that no one would listen to my REAL EVIDENCE. WELL FUCK YOU...ALSO THIS IS DAVID FROM PANORAMA, AND ALSO I BELIEVE, NICK FROM EXARO. ALL FUCKING LIARS TO DERAIL THE CHILD ABUSE INQUIRY......THESE PEOPLE ARE EVIL, PURE FUCKING EVIL. FUCK YOU." ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sONwxTUXaL4
England's got a well established history for licencing illegal and criminal things by Royal Decree. Now this is bought into focus, with licences to privateer and kill in mind, please consider the practicality of providing children and other sex related services to targets and potentially blackmailing them, and how this would work if the facilitator wasn't in receipt of a licence.
If Sir Savile had one, then who else had one, and who's got one now?
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHSZRZo7HpM
*BECAUSE IT WASN'T A "COVER UP". It was a clever ploy to avert attention from the publication of the 7/7 London Bombings, a.k.a. cover up. This mass publicity is totally inconsistent with a cover up. It's the antithetical of a cover up.
People speculate that the McCanns (Jerry and Kate) had some dirt on the government and called in a favour. I'd not say the mass publicity was much of a favour, and their actions in setting up a defence fund, fraudulently mascarading as a Find Madeline Fund's set up was very proficient and was not objected to by the UK authorities.
I'm certain that it's more a case of what the British establishment had on the McCanns, and the layers of lies put out about the case makes speculation on them highly unreliable---and for the purposes of this theory, irrelevant.
I believe that the Portuguese government went along with not charging the McCanns as they were offered a deal. This then extended to the Gancalo Amaral "libel" case, which no one can cite the libel he's alleged to have committed.
I believe that it's very likely that the deal was that the Portuguese's reward for covering up 7/7 was that they'd be spared any pressure to take part in any NATO Gladio false flags domestically, and thus, both they and the UK are winners, as Portugal is not that important militarily and thus not needed to mount illegal wars with the pretext of mass public approval based on terrorism events, blamed on Muslims in their country---whereas in the UK's case, this is essential.
Thanks and credits to:
John Kimber for making the link in terms of a significant event and the dates;
Nick Kollestrom for proving what a total balls up the 7/7 false flag was and how many things which were really meant to be kept out of the public's eye miserably failed; and,
anyone else who can contribute and allow me to better understand if this theory has any legs, as I'm certain that it does.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUH6zXqYJPw
Subversive, pro-paedophile counter intelligence agent, Bill Baloney just can't stop himself. He's got one of his naive suppoters, Brenda, aka, Mumsy Mcnamara, posing with a little boy who's got a Freemason sign on his T-shirt. Then Santa's been put in there. He's pointing at the T-shirt and the boy. Santa's hands are making the Masonic M hand sign. The boy is also making a fist as he's presumably been told to, and that's also a Masons sign.
Symbolism isn't something I'd linked to Baloney or his boss, Ian Puddick, but they do have PIE in the name Pie and Mash Films, and Puddick's actually always doing these signs---always.
This video was posted yesterday, which you can see here. First slide in.
I didn't watch it all, but it's got the goblin, Ben Fellows pictured a couple of minutes in.
Baloney's been keeping a low profile of late, due to people catching on to him, his dissolved limited companies, that he and his wife Maria Baloney have been using to extort well wishers' money via.
His latest thing was to have a people's panel against child abuse, with Jewish subversive, Ian Puddick, who's also a known con man, and unpleasant friend of the police, who he claims keep trying to set him up. Ian's probably not convincing many people that he's a plumber, but he is in the Honourable Company of Plumbers and so is Fiona Woolf.
Funnily enough, Ian's been on a radio show denying that the police roughed him up, this week, so he still hasn't decided what his fake story is, which I think it short sighted. If you're going to lie, don't change the details, or it's obvious.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2BXCzt96rc
Danielle Deller's 'never done videos before' but actually she has. She's also being CLAIMING to be an agoraphobic. Some people think she's been claiming benefit on behalf of this non-existent medical problem and that's why she pulled some of her Danielle George videos down, when she put her foot in it about these ones being evidence of her fraud. It definitely wouldn't surprise me.
Working with the pro-paedophile counter intelligence programme is as low as anyone can get. There is nothing she wouldn't do for money or the promise of money.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-f2GXQwhLg
Bill Baloney 'scared' Nick Clegg (the UK's deputy prime minister) away from a press conference, which was swiftly followed by two news readers covering the event. If you believe that politicians run away from their press conferences when some old man shouts at them, then you're past being worth bothering with. But there's much more.
Feel free to comment, but if you must call me names and be generally and indirectionally coarse, I might not feel that there's any point in responding.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rur4VPoaDO0
Dr. Coleman's on YouTube as well
Mirrored from:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/why-and-how-they-plan-to-kill-seven-billion_loR7dirywg1993R.html
This video as with others have been removed from YT, so it is better to register on Brand New Tube where you might follow him as well as other content and set up the bell notifications.
Caveat:
*In the last minute, just before the end, he mentions the UK Column in a favourable light which is very suspicious _if_ he knows anything about them, which he should or maybe they've been at him to get publicity from his slip stream. Before I knew any better I'd've known to call them out within a month, but I didn't; I know better. This is the problem. He should know better or maybe he's not found anything amiss and thinks he'll just give them a mention.
He also mentions some other publications in that last minute, so if anyone knows anything about them, negative or positive, then I'd be pleased for this information to be made available to me.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8wIKS2thHE