Welcome to the 2nd episode of Asked & Answered! In this second episode we will once again be answering frequently asked questions that have arisen during the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard defamation trial. All of the questions here frequently arise during streams in both Super chats and the normal chat. The idea is that when these questions come up, we can answer with 'Asked and Answered' and refer people to these videos which will be linked in the stream description. Can Amber's Ex Tasya van Ree come in? Can the judge discuss the case at her judicial conference? Is the full Australia audio admissible? Answers to these questions and more are contained in the video. Any questions you didn't find answered in the video? Drop them in the comments below and maybe we'll have some answers for you. Thanks for watching! 00:00 Introduction 00:10 Preface 00:56 Can the Judge discuss the case during the break? 02:30 What mechanisms are in place to ensure the jury isn't influenced by the media/social media during the week long break? 04:10 Does the jury decision have to be unanimous? 04:32 Can the jury talk to one another about the evidence before deliberations? 05:07 Can the jury rewatch parts of the trial during deliberations? 05:32 Can JD, AH, the legal teams, and expert witnesses view the news, social media, and testimony? 07:16 Can expert witnesses talk with the legal teams if they're subject to recall? 08:41 Can JD and Dr. Dawn Hughes be recalled to the stand? 10:34 Do rebuttal witnesses have the same restrictions as other witnesses? 11:40 Have you heard the dating app allegations against Amber Heard's new PR guy? 13:06 Regarding the OpEd title - Regardless of who wrote it, isn't it enough that the public believes it was written by AH? 15:23 Will AH's cosmetic surgeries and the associated records come up? 17:19 Where are the Moscow flight attendant and the woman from the Joshua Tree trailer park? 18:58 Can JD bring in AH's criminal record? 21:55 Why can Ellen Barkin testify if character evidence isn't allowed? 23:26 Can Tasya van Ree come in? 26:09 Does AH opening the door for Kate Moss also open the door for all of Johnny's former partners? 27:54 Have you heard the full, uncut Australia audio tapes? 28:38 Why can't the full Australia audio come in? (What if 3rd parties give their consent?) 32:28 Is it a bad look for JD to be looking down, writing, and drawing during testimony? 34:19 Wrapping up ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Asked and Answered Episode 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6S6_ZlssOHU Courtroom Attire - Dressing your case and the fashion of Depp v. Heard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvTW9zmDAvU Day 15 Recap: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6CZjFZ4_Zw Mutual Abuse explained by Psychologists Dr. Kirk Honda and Dr. Courtney Tracy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3G3YB4Lawdw Psychologists React To Gendered Pronoun Use by Dr. Dawn Hughes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM3ZoTWm5PU Two of the key incidents in play: What Do the Facts REALLY Say? | Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sJ4GabSN8 EVERYTHING You Need to Know About The Case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMKmcRF38FU Be sure to subscribe to @LegalBytes Clips for highlights of all our live streams, including clips from the trial published live throughout the day! What do you think? Let us know your thoughts in the comments! --------------------- Follow me here! Twitter: https://twitter.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia --------------------- Support content like this here! Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes --------------------- Buy some Merch: https://legal-bytes.creator-spring.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For some background: This is a defamation case between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. Johnny Depp is suing Amber Heard for defamation stemming from her OpEd published in The Washington Post in 2018. Amber Heard is counter suing for defamation claims based on statements made by Johnny Depp's former lawyer. The trial is taking place in Fairfax, Virginia, the proper venue as The Washington Post is headquartered in said location. Presiding is Judge Penny Azcarate, Johnny Depp is represented by Ben Chew, Camille Vasquez, and more. Amber Heard is represented by Elaine Bredehoft, Ben Rottenborn, and more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ #JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard #DeppVsHeard ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wNX_Fypxto

This is a commentary stream of the verdict watch in the so-called "Love Triangle Murder Trial," aka TX v. Kaitlin Armstrong. Joining us: McKinley at @LegallyLive - go subscribe to her channel! ? Playlist to all videos on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbQVtXJ42xmgBG1MHBgN1gBdocikwsP21 FOR CONTEXT: Yoga instructor Kaitlin Armstrong is on trial for murdering a professional bicyclist named Anna Moriah "Mo" Wilson. Kaitlin was in a relationship with professional bicyclist Colin Strickland. When Kaitlin and Colin were on a break in their relationship, Colin very briefly dated Mo. Friends described this as basically a very casual, very brief dating period, without much emotional connection. Things didn't work out romantically for Colin and Mo, but they allegedly remained friends. Prosecutors allege that Kaitlin became very jealous of Mo ever since, and that this jealousy drove her to take Mo's life. After she was questioned by police, she fled to Costa Rica on her sister's passport, where she dyed her hair and had plastic surgery that changed her face dramatically. After she was apprehended, she tried escaping a second time, this time from a doctor's appointment she had in jail. Trial in this case began on October 30th in Austin, TX when a jury was paneled. On November 1st, the prosecution and defense gave their opening statements. Time Stamps: 0:00 Introduction 1:07 Witness No. 1 - Det. Richard Spitler 6:11 Witness No. 2 - Joan Gilchrist (Owner, 68 Degrees Kitchen) 6:38 Witness No. 3 - Nicole Mertz (Friend) 8:16 Witness No. 4 - Jacqueline Chasteen (Friend) 9:41 Witness No. 5 - Keith Cox (GM of Carmax) 10:45 Witness No. 6 - Brian Bell (VP of Communications, Strava) To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- ? Our podcast: Anchor: https://anchor.fm/legalbytes Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4i3YLopgl2NaUBTiflIOOI Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-bytes-podcast/id1602889876 Google Podcast: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy83YmUxZDA1NC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw -------------------- ? We have a @LegalBytes Clips channel for clips from our live streams. Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaDeBhtXsTCS0W0pT9AzPbg -------------------- Follow me here! Twitter: https://twitter.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia -------------------- ? Dragon's Treasure Teas: Visit https://www.thedragonstreasure.com/?dt_id=148709 for 10% off some delicious teas and to support this channel! -------------------- Merch: https://legal-bytes.creator-spring.com -------------------- #LoveTriangleMurderTrial #TXvKaitlinArmstrong #KaitlinArmstrong ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF10rkNotZA

Join us on a journey back to 1993 as we live stream the entire trial of CA v. Menendez Brothers in weekly segments. In this episode, we’re doing a light recap and continuing watching and commenting on testimony by Dr. Jerome Oziel, and watching for the first time the testimony of Dr. Jeffrey Lulow. FOR CONTEXT: In 1989, Jose and Kitty Menendez were killed in their Beverly Hills home. They died of shotgun wounds. In 1990, their two sons, Erik and Lyle, were arrested for the murder of their parents after Erik confessed to killing their parents in a session with his psychologist. The prosecution framed their motive as a desire to inherit the $14M estate from their parents. The defense claimed self-defense and a desperate attempt to escape family violence and SA. -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- ? Our podcast: Anchor: https://anchor.fm/legalbytes Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4i3YLopgl2NaUBTiflIOOI Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-bytes-podcast/id1602889876 Google Podcast: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy83YmUxZDA1NC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw -------------------- ? We have a @legalbytesclips4042 channel for clips from our live streams. Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaDeBhtXsTCS0W0pT9AzPbg -------------------- Follow me here! Twitter: https://twitter.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia -------------------- ? Dragon's Treasure Teas: Visit https://www.thedragonstreasure.com/?dt_id=148709 for 10% off some delicious teas and to support this channel! -------------------- Merch: https://legal-bytes.creator-spring.com -------------------- #MenendezBrothers #ErikMenendez #LyleMenendez ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjZPieDUMS4

Join us on a journey back to 1993 as we live stream the entire trial of CA v. Menendez Brothers in weekly segments. In this episode, we’re watching the defense's case-in-chief. Witness: - Dr. Ann Burgess FOR CONTEXT: In 1989, Jose and Kitty Menendez were killed in their Beverly Hills home. They died of shotgun wounds. In 1990, their two sons, Erik and Lyle, were arrested for the murder of their parents after Erik confessed to killing their parents in a session with his psychologist. The prosecution framed their motive as a desire to inherit the $14M estate from their parents. The defense claimed self-defense and a desperate attempt to escape family violence and SA. -------------------- To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon: YT Members: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvDEmKLft6F2MxhuNUMwag/join Locals: https://legalbytes.locals.com Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalbytes -------------------- ? Our podcast: Anchor: https://anchor.fm/legalbytes Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4i3YLopgl2NaUBTiflIOOI Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-bytes-podcast/id1602889876 Google Podcast: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy83YmUxZDA1NC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw -------------------- ? We have a @legalbytesclips4042 channel for clips from our live streams. Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaDeBhtXsTCS0W0pT9AzPbg -------------------- Follow me here! Twitter: https://twitter.com/legalbytesmedia Instagram: https://instagram.com/legalbytesmedia Facebook: https://Facebook.com/legalbytesmedia -------------------- ? Dragon's Treasure Teas: Visit https://www.thedragonstreasure.com/?dt_id=148709 for 10% off some delicious teas and to support this channel! -------------------- Merch: https://legal-bytes.creator-spring.com -------------------- #MenendezBrothers #ErikMenendez #LyleMenendez ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skR_7rUnEq8