Paul Millerd was a McKinsey consultant before quitting for an independent life on the internet. He's the author of The Pathless Path: Imagining a New Story For Work and Life.
✦ The Pathless Path: https://amzn.to/3lieLy9
✦ Paul's newsletter: https://boundless.substack.com
✦ Paul on Twitter: https://twitter.com/p_millerd
Other Life
✦ Subscribe to the coolest newsletter in the world https://OtherLife.co
✦ Get a free Urbit planet at https://imperceptible.computer
✦ We're building a new country at https://imperceptible.country
IndieThinkers.org
✦ If you're working on independent intellectual work, join the next cohort of https://IndieThinkers.org
0:00 Intro
1:30 Wtf is a McKinsey?
6:14 From consulting to content creation & leisure optimization
8:45 The economic returns of non-work
12:23 Coping with money insecurity by embracing uncertainty
16:36 The Pathless Path in a nutshell
20:16 Portfolio breakdown
29:40 Leaning into anti-strategies
31:56 The currency of energy
35:07 Combating admin creep
38:24 Venkatesh Rao, designing for liking work, & accepting mediocrity
45:01 Quality ambling
47:22 The architecture of independence
53:34 Deconstructing work
56:32 Lessons learned from writing a book
1:08:34 Do metrics matter?
1:11:49 Optimizing for quitting
1:16:06 The ecstasy of turning down $40K
1:21:59 Taking the long, slow, dumb, & fun path
1:24:11 Winning the game of self-employment
1:26:23 Closing words
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khV8fK6zg5E
As an academic, I'm friends with a lot of highly educated, progressive women, often international and cosmopolitan. Last night hanging out with some people, it struck me that many educated progressive women think quite poorly of women interested in "traditional gender roles." I think that's wrong for a few reasons. Feminism should extend also to women who believe women are better off playing traditionally female-gendered roles. It's not clear what is the best path for different women, so I reject the idea popular in progressive circles that there's something necessarily reactionary about "trad" women.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Me13JvsA4ew
Clip from Other Life #129 with Samo Burja. https://OtherLife.co
Samo Burja is the founder of a consultancy called Bismarck Analysis, but he's interesting to me primarily as a theorist and researcher who has carved out an impressive niche for himself as an independent intellectual. I've invited Samo on the podcast to learn more about his ideas, but also to look under the hood of his larger operation because I think there's a lot to learn there, especially for all the rest of us who are finding our own ways to conduct professional-level intellectual work outside of traditional institutions.
Samo's website: https://samoburja.com
Samo's book, Great Founder Theory: https://samoburja.com/gft
Samo's Twitter: https://twitter.com/samoburja
Bismarck Analysis: https://bismarckanalysis.com
✦ If you're doing intellectual work outside of institutions, check out https://IndieThinkers.org
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4U1FZBw2Nw
A live lecture on radical politics for 'control societies,' in the work of Gilles Deleuze. More below:
Get the whole video course for Based Deleuze: https://gumroad.com/l/deleuze
Are you an independent intellectual on the internet? Check out https://www.indiethinkers.org
Join my Discord server: http://bit.ly/join-otherlife-via-youtube
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuCBNUealGA
From a private seminar hosted in the Other Life community. To learn more and follow community events, subscribe to the free newsletter at https://OtherLife.co
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsETzOGuhnU
Today we take for granted platitudes such as, "the world is made of information." But only a few decades ago, such phrases would have made very little sense to anyone. Even today, most people who repeat such commonplaces really could not tell you very much about what exactly information is. We talk to each other everyday and assume we are communicating, but are we really?
The precise nature of information is a very recent discovery. Arguably it is one of the most crucial discoveries that would lead to what we now call the Information Age. The nature of information was formalized in 1948 by Claude Shannon, working at Bell Labs. It is an alluring story that has already been told better than I could tell it here, although we should try to better understand the political implications.
Probably the best, short, intuitive definition of information was written by Gregory Bateson: "a difference which makes a difference." If I tell you something you already know, I'm not giving you information; that would be a difference that does not make a difference. If I tell you something you do not already know, I would be giving you information. Your world would change, ever so slightly.
But any message or signal can have more or less information content. David Krakauer of the Santa Fe Institute provides the following example to help build your intuition of this idea. If you want to find a specific location--say, my flat in Southampton--you could just drive all over Southampton randomly until you find it. That would take a lot of time, with a lot of error, before you eventually found it. But what if I drew you a map from where you are now, at the university, to my flat, with arrows along the streets you should take and a circle around where my flat is located? The information content of the map can be measured by *the amount of time the map saved you.
Claude Shannon mathematically formalized this basic intution, and laid the groundwork for any number of technological advancements based on the increasingly sophisticated command of information. Shannon's mathematical theory of information is way above my pay grade, and for our purposes there is no need to grapple with any of the mathematics, but it is necessary to build up an intuitive sense of this new way to think about information and communication. We should also try to gain a sense of the political context and the political, historical consequences that flow from this model of information and communication.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDXSCV6xW-A
Data sources and techniques you might use for research papers about the media. Lexis/Nexis for newspaper data, cross-national historical data on media technology penetration, Twitter data, Google Search results data Google N-Grams, etc.
Newsletter: https://tinyletter.com/jmrphy
Blog: http://jmrphy.net/blog
Twitter: http://twitter.com/jmrphy
Podcast: http://jmrphy.libsyn.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/otherlifenow/
Periscope: https://www.pscp.tv/jstnmrphy
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jstnmrphy/
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ_0GGOc2ds
Tonight I have a little spiel on the dynamics of Trump's approval ratings. Then I'll be joined by JG Michael, who writes about theory, mythology, and horror, among other things. Also we share strong interests in Theodor Adorno. JG's podcast is Parallax Views (https://parallaxviews.podbean.com/). He recently had me on there so I wanted to have him on here.
Newsletter: https://tinyletter.com/jmrphy
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLLZzH0EHT4