Sovereign Citizens. Part Two. Are people who get falsely or inaccurately labelled as 'sovereign citizens' a genuine risk? Who is the real risk? Are researchers (dissenters) being labelled (discredited) as 'dangerous sovereign citizen types' so police can become increasingly militarized or heavy-handed in response to the alleged threat? Contact "the GLOSSA channel" at glossa.channel @gmail.com If you find the information and insights presented on the GLOSSA channel helpful, please consider showing your support by considering our Justinian Deception items on eBay. All proceeds will help fund further interviews and the sharing of our research information. The eBay link (cut-and-paste) can be found here: https://www.ebay.com/sch/the-glossa-channel/m.html?item=153714749405&hash=item23ca1cefdd%3Ag%3Ax%7EkAAOSwgstbZstr&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562 Or simply go to the eBay website in your country and search for "the Justinian Deception". Your help and support is genuinely needed and appreciated. Thank you!

Does your Birth Certificate identify you as TWO people, not one? Furthermore, in recent years, a number of individuals have successfully exposed that the ATO (Australian Taxation Office) was never properly Gazetted by government. In fact, by its own admission, the ATO is not a legal entity. This was determined in the High Court of Australia on 17 May, 2000, in a case presided over by the judge Justice J. Callinan. As such, the paying of income tax may be viewed as voluntary, not compulsory, for Australian individuals. Such facts - which should have been 'front page news' in the mainstream media - were suppressed rather than headlined. Anyone curious about the true facts should firstly listen to this Exclusive (but currently un-edited) interview with Romley Stewart and then research the "ATO versus Wolter Joosse" and "Moeliker V. Chapman" court cases where individuals successfully proved that the ATO is not able to levy personal income tax unless you voluntarily consent. The Australian (corporate) government is lying to an uninformed and/or misinformed public, a public who would be outraged if they discovered the true extent to which they have been misled. Keen students eager to begin the long task of educating themselves can begin their research by reading the following comments from the momentous Moeliker V. Chapman (High Court of Australia) court case held in May 2000: The law that established the Australian Taxation Office has been challenged in court. The Plaintiff created the need to document the ATO’s formation to the satisfaction of the court. The Plaintiff, with the approval of the Australian National Library in Canberra, Australia, brought into the court every Federal Government Gazette for the time period around when taxation law was passed by the Federal Parliament. The Defendant was then asked: "Please show us in which Gazette we will find the Legislation regarding the Australian Taxation Office" to which the Defendant stated; "It is not in any Government Gazette". The judge in the matter (Justice J. Callinan) then stated: "You have proved beyond any doubt that the law establishing the Australian Taxation Office has not been Gazetted and that places its legality in question".