No justice for Child Sexual Abuse in a Manchester Home Gemma Fox was sexually abused by her parents for as long as she can remember, and a culture was created within her family where this was seen as 'normal' even by her siblings. Eventually, through a Scout troop her abuser/father was discovered and prosecuted but even then he was only handed a non-custodial sentence by the courts. Greater Manchester Police have been informed several times of these crimes but have not interviewed Gemma's mother. She's now part of The UK Child Sexual Abuse People's Tribunal because she does not believe the government's Goddard Enquiry will be able to properly investigate the Home Office and other government agencies that have covered up child sexual abuse for decades. http://www.UKCSAPT.org.uk 07549 228377 On BCfm - DialectRadio.co.uk - Tue 29th Sep 2015 Introduction The United Kingdom Child Sex Abuse People’s Tribunal (UKCSAPT), established by survivors of child sex abuse and members of civil society, has been created to investigate institutional child sex abuse. There are many objectives which the UKCSAPT seeks to accomplish. The UKCSAPT seeks to end the tolerance of impunity with regards to this grave issue. No individual who has sexually abused a child or children will be deemed to be above the law, however powerful their position in an institution or organisation is or was; or however powerful that individual is or was perceived to be. Furthermore, where institutional child sex abuse has taken place and there is sufficient evidence that it has taken place, justice should be seen to be done. In addition, institutions must be held accountable where they have failed to prevent, covered-up, or have facilitated institutional child sex abuse. Where institutions have failed in their duty to children, the UKCSAPT will seek to make recommendations about how these institutions should address the problems identified. Against this backdrop, the UKCSAPT seeks to: independently raise potential avenues of inquiry related to the context, nature, and depth of institutional child sex abuse provide a safe space free from interference and scrutiny to allow survivors, supporters, and witnesses to speak freely regarding institutional child sex abuse independently establish how institutional policies and judicial systems have failed survivors and failed to protect the best interests of the child independently determine and discuss which constructive remedies could best address institutional child sexual abuse and the allegations brought forth. Definitions A ‘child’ is defined as any person under 18 years of age, as defined by Article 1 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. ‘Institution’ means any society, body or organisation with the responsibility for the care, health or welfare of children. ‘Institution’ under these Terms also includes political parties, religious organisations, the Monarchy, Secret Services, the Government, the Police, Local Authorities, Armed Forces and the Civil Service. Structure Currently the United Kingdom Crown Services has set up an Independent Panel Inquiry (Panel) into Child Sexual Abuse. The Panel seeks to consider the extent state and non-state institutions failed to protect children from child sexual abuse. The UKCSAPT works independently from the Panel and is purely a grassroots based mechanism. The means and methods to create such a mechanism have been created solely by survivors of child sexual abuse and activists who seek to end child sexual abuse in the UK. All members who are part of the UKCSAPT work in a voluntary capacity. No one who participates in the Panel is excluded from participating in the UKCSAPT. Remit The UKCSAPT’s remit will focus on Members of Parliament (MP’s) and Police who have been complicit or perpetrated the sexual abuse of children either directly or indirectly through the suppression of evidence of allegations and investigations. The UKCSAPT reserves the right to modify its parameters after the end of the current submission process. Methodology The UKCSAPT will take evidence from survivors and/or witnesses in person. http://ukcsapt.org.uk/terms-of-reference-2/ ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3JVkyd6dm4

Tony Gosling, Worked for the BBC, Changes to the media, controlled by a handful of people, BREXIT, Politics Show on Bristol Community FM, Fake News, Fake Websites, Click Bait, People are waking up What to Do About ‘Fake News’ November 18, 2016 Exclusive: A pushback is coming to the Internet’s success in giving the world access to diverse opinions and dissenting information. Politicians, mainstream media and technology giants are taking aim at what they call “fake news,” reports Robert Parry. By Robert Parry In the wake of Donald Trump’s victory, a hot new issue – raised by President Obama in an international setting on Thursday and touted on The New York Times’ front page on Friday – is the problem of “fake news” being disseminated on the Internet. Major Internet companies, such as Google and Facebook, are being urged to censor such articles and to punish alleged violators. Also, teams of supposedly “responsible” news providers and technology giants are being assembled to police this alleged problem and decide what is true and what is not. President Obama in the Oval Office. President Obama in the Oval Office. But therein lies the more serious problem: who gets to decide what is real and what is not real? And – in an age when all sides propagate propaganda – when does conformity in support of a mainstream “truth” become censorship of reasonable skepticism? As a journalist for more than four decades, I take seriously the profession’s responsibility to verify information as much as possible before publishing it – and as editor of Consortiumnews.com, I insist that our writers (and to the extent possible, outside commenters) back up what they say. I personally hate “conspiracy theories” in which people speculate about a topic without real evidence and often in defiance of actual evidence. I believe in traditional journalistic standards of cross-checking data and applying common sense. So, I am surely no fan of Internet hoaxes and baseless accusations. Yet, I also recognize that mainstream U.S. news outlets have made horrendous and wholesale factual errors, too, such as reporting in 2002-03 that Iraq had reconstituted its nuclear weapons program (The New York Times) and was hiding stockpiles of WMD (many TV and print outlets, including The Washington Post). And, mainstream outlets getting such life-and-death stories wrong was not just a one-off affair around the Iraq invasion. At least since the 1980s, The New York Times has misreported or glossed over many international issues that put the United States and its allies in a negative light. For instance, the Times not only missed the Nicaraguan Contra cocaine scandal, but actively covered up the Reagan administration’s role in the wrongdoing through the 1980s and much of the 1990s. The Times lagged badly, too, on investigating the secret operations that became known as the Iran-Contra Affair. The Times’ gullibility in the face of official denials was an obstacle for those of us digging into that constitutional crisis and other abuses by the Reagan administration. [For more on this topic, see Consortiumnews.com’s “New York Times: Apologist for Power.”] https://consortiumnews.com/2016/11/18/what-to-do-about-fake-news/ Better news reporting up to 1980/90's http://www.oymradio.com - 27 Nov 2016 ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2O8wpJShho

Bilderberg Dresden 2016 Highlights https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdX9k_IE_6k Marco Verheij & Maria Van Boekelen https://www.youtube.com/user/WeAreChangeRotterdam http://www.wearechange.nl/ https://www.twitter.com/wearechangerdam https://www.facebook.com/WeAreChangeRotterdam/ #Bilderberg2016, Dresden: Highlights UNCATEGORIZED14 JUN, 20162 These are our #Bilderberg2016 highlights! The past week we have us a battle in the circle work for you to give an impression of this year's annual Super Lobby Meeting. Why, you ask? Because the #MSM completely ignores, in fact that just sit at the table, prepared to make every concession. Because we do not accept that representatives refuse to #be transparent about the issues that they discuss that is deep can intervene in our lives. Because the account of their stay at this 5 star hotel directly to you and me. Because our alarm bells go off when we ‘Technological innovation’ and ‘Cyber security’ on the agenda to see and know that the CEO's of #Google #DeepMind, #Alphabet and #Palantir there. We create media, bring it with you and hope that you are aware of. #BeTheChange Let your appreciation show, like and share our vids, donate what it is worth to you: NL04 TRIO 0777 8590 68 o.v.v. Bilderberg2016! http://wearechange.nl/?p=388 TUESDAY, APRIL 01, 2014 DEMMINK, HEROIN, PEDOPHILE RINGS In a court in Holland, a former police chief, Klaas Langedoen, has said that 'Turkey blackmailed Joris Demmink' the former boss of the Dutch Justice Ministry. 'Turkije chanteerde justitietop met Demmink ... - De Telegraaf - Translate this page Demmink has been accused of sexually abusing boys in Turkey. Langedoen, the former chief of the Dutch Criminal Investigation Department (CID), carried out an investigation in Turkey. The blackmail deal was reportedly arranged between former Turkish Prime Minister Tansu Çiller and the then Dutch Minister of Justice Winnie Sorgdrager. Baybasin Reportedly Turkey blackmailed Demmink so as to get a Kurd called Hüseyin Baybasin put in jail. However, reportedly, Demmink was keen to prevent Baybasin talking about top peole and criminal activities and was happy to have Baybasin put in jail. Baybasin is linked to top Turkish government officials involved in heroin smuggling. He became active in the movement to gain greater autonomy for the Kurds and became an enemy of the Turkish government. He took refuge in Holland but was later jailed by the Dutch. Strop om nek Joris Demmink trekt zich strakker, de Baybasin affaire - Translate this page http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/demmink-heroin-pedophile-rings.html ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHz1ay6gG-c

Did exiled Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky or MI6 kill Alexander Litvinenko and if so why? Davos millionaires consider what to do about massive 'surplus' global population. The conclusion of the Litvinenko murder trial – blaming Putin – but why would FSB use a traceable poison - Polonium 210: 'Blowing Up Russia' book by Litvinenko – false flag operation set up by Berezovsky and possibly Putin and possibly backed by West – to prevent Communists getting back into power; Polonium trail – Berezovsky's office; suicide of Berezovsky; Berezovsky giving money to Duke of Kent; Litvinenko in pay of MI6; Yasser Arafat was killed by Polonium; Gadaffi - death of Yvonne Fletcher and 'Murder in St. James' Dispatches documentary – Lockerbie and 'Maltese Double Cross' documentary by Frankovich. https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2016/01/22/bcfms-weekly-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-19/ Britain, not Russia, probably killed Litvinenko, says brother BY AT EDITOR on JANUARY 22, 2016 http://atimes.com/2016/01/suspect-says-mi6-tried-to-recruiting-him-bef ore-litvinenkos-death/ The brother of former Russian FSB secret service agent Aleksandr Litvinenko says the UK government had more motivation to kill him than Russia did, despite a British public inquiry which concluded that President Putin “probably” approved the assassination. Maksim Litvinenko, Aleksandr’s younger brother who lives in Rimini, Italy, responded to the Thursday report by saying it was “ridiculous” to blame the Kremlin for the murder of his brother, stating that he believes British security services had more of a motive to carry out the assassination. “My father and I are sure that the Russian authorities are not involved. It’s all a set-up to put pressure on the Russian government,” Litvinenko told the Mirror, adding that such reasoning is the only explanation as to why the inquiry was launched 10 years after his brother’s death. He called the British report a “smear” on Putin, and stressed that rumors claiming his brother was an enemy of the state are false. He added that Aleksandr had planned to return to Russia, and had even told friends about the move. Litvinenko went on to downplay his brother’s alleged role as a spy, working for either Russia or MI6, adding that the Western media is to blame for such characterization. “The Russians had no reason to want Alexander dead,” he said. “My brother was not a spy, he was more like a policeman…he was in the FSB [Russian Federal Security Service] but he worked against organized crime, murders, arms trafficking, stuff like that.” Suspect links death to MI6 Andrey Lugovoy, one of the accused for his alleged role in the death of Litvinenko, said the British intelligence tried to recruit him before Litvinenko’s death. On Thursday, an inquiry report said Lugovoy, along with his former colleague Dmitry Kovtun, poisoned Litvinenko with polonium-210. Participating in the ‘Evening with Vladimir Solovyov’ show on the Rossiya 1 TV channel, Lugovoy said he was likely exposed to polonium simultaneously with Litvinenko. Lugovoy also drew a connection between the death of Litvinenko and the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). “Litvinenko died in November 2006. In March-April, I was openly offered cooperation [by MI6] and in order to motivate me somehow, I was denied a visa. That was in May 2006. And after I called Litvinenko – I’ve said this multiple times – I was granted a visa all of a sudden. I have always connected these two events,” Lugovoy recalled. He stressed that prior to May 2006, he had always received British visas without any problems. “They [UK] always gave me visas, and did it with great pleasure before May 2006, when I was denied a visa after the British intelligence MI6 tried recruiting me.” He does not plan to go to court to clear his name. “I don’t intend to do that, because if I go into that, it means I will attach importance to what the British are doing, and they are trying to do everything so that we pay more attention to it [the UK inquiry], so that we react to it somehow,” he said. He also does not want to leave Russia. “I have not left Russia for a long time now and I do not plan to do it.” ‘London relied on forged evidence’ The inquiry report on the Litvinenko affair is based on forged evidence, said Kovtun, one of the two Russians suspected of poisoning Litvinenko. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3tVXkNSSTg