Ted Kuntz founded Vaccine Choice Canada after his son was horribly injured by a vaccine he was given early in life. This was a terrible crime, because our Governments - and the Pharmaceutical Industry - both knew that the vaccines could be dangerous to children. But in Canada, big business is so powerful that Mr. Kuntz and his wife were never told about the risks and they and their son were forced to pay a terrible price for decades. It is very possible that the entire vaccine story we are told is a pack of lies. It is very possible that vaccines are both ineffective and unsafe. So we don't need them and they are dangerous. But they are also very profitable .... so here we are.
Because there is big money in vaccines - everyone lies. Health Canada, who approves these vaccines, lie to us about safety and effectiveness. The media, who always pretend to be our great friend, they refuse to report the truth. All the Corporate Journalists on Television, Radio, the Newspapers and etc... not one of them ever dares report the truth about vaccines because they know the truth is not allowed and they would be fired immediately if they said something outside of 'the official story'.
We are always told that vaccines are safe and effective. They are a great miracle of modern medicine. Vaccines have saved the health and lives of countless numbers of children. We are so lucky to have vaccines.
But there is a great deal of evidence that vaccines did not save children and get rid of the diseases. We talk about that evidence in the video. There is a lot of evidence that the healthiest children are the ones with the least amount of vaccinations. There is a real risk that vaccines are dangerous. There is evidence that vaccinated children will have more health problems for their whole lives. We talk about that evidence.
We discuss the link between vaccines and autism. We talk about the way the U.S. CDC hid the evidence of that link between vaccines and autism. We ask why the media will not report that and how our governments don't care and pretend it is all safe.
Things are a mess in Canada folks. This vaccine scandal, the betrayal of us all for corporate profit, is just one tip of the iceberg.
Brian Peckford was one of the signees of Canada's "Constitution Act' and Charter of Rights and Freedoms back in 1982. He discusses the details of how Canada's Constitution is currently put together and how it works. He says one reason the Charter was added to our constitution because many people felt it was important to have our rights actually written down and codified.
When the Pandemic was declared by the WHO, on the basis of fairly flimsy evidence, many governments including the gov't of Canada put in place a bunch of mandates and lockdowns to 'save us' ... and brought in a vaccine that was and still is untested. At that time Mr. Peckford, as a signatory to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, became concerned at what he saw as 'violations' of that Charter. The governments do have a right to override the charter, but they must be able to demonstrably show the need to do so. This was not done.
At the same time doctors were being threatened with loss of their medical licenses if they dared question the official story. Again this is hard to justify within the scope of the Charter. What the courts and governments have been doing is in violation of the intent and words of the Charter.
Mr. Peckford - along with several others - initiated a lawsuit against the federal government questioning their right to limit the ability to travel of millions of Canadians. The suit was brought at the beginning of 2022. There were going to be 5 days of public hearings in Sept. 0f 2022. In June of 2022 the feds asked the Federal Court to dismiss the case because ... the travel mandates were 'suspended'. And the court agreed with the Government of Canada and found there was no reason to even hear the case brought by Mr. Peckford et al. As if everything that had been done to Canadians for months was of 'no importance' to the federal court. Mr. Peckford calls this a 'divorce' between law and justice.
So Mr. Peckford and the others have decided to appeal the decision to the Federal Court of Appeals, which is where things now stand. With long waits coming before anything happens in the courts. The next step if necessary will be an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, where the Chief Justice has already denigrated the rights of Canadians to maintain our Charter rights.
Also, on November 2, 2022, a Citizen Led Inquiry into Canada's Covid Response will be announced. What was the evidence that led us into the Covid response. What was the actual science that our governments, public health officials, and media kept well hidden. The plan is to have hearings across Canada.
Technocracy
Recently I mentioned it appears we are moving towards a Fascist – Technocracy. Most people have a passing familiarity with what a fascist society is, maybe best described by Mussolini himself as better named corporatism; he did not include they are also dictatorships or at least most are. Technocracy is not as well understood; iA neutral definition of Technocracy is “a government system wherein scientists and technical experts hold political offices and make decisions in public interests. These policymakers, also known as technocrats, utilize their knowledge and expertise to address issues, such as financial, industrial, etc., that the country is facing at the time of their appointment's ia form of government run by technocrats (scientists and engineers etc) and bureaucrats. My feeling is such a government will quickly descend into a kakistocracy (Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens.) Some may say we have already reached a state of kakistocracy. One should be careful forcing name definition onto our current or projected form of government. Defining a government or political approach in a few simple lines will lack to much in the final analysis, life is not that simple.
Technocracy was a movement that reached its peak around the mid 1930’s in the US and Canada. It was a political party with candidates in Canada and the US. For a time the most influential figure in Canada was a chiropractor Dr. Joshua Haldeman. Dr Haldeman’s other claim to fame is he was the grandfather of Elon Musk, does that help people understand Elon Musk better? https://www.technocracy.news/shock-elon-musks-grandfather-was-head-of-canadas-technocracy-movement/ As a movement Technocracy as a the concept came into existence in 1919 when California engineer William Henry Smyth used the term in his article “Technocracy – Ways and Means to Gain Industrial Democracy.” Into the 1930’s it was cultured at the Columbia University.“
Technocracy Inc wrote in their magazine The Technocrat magazine in 1939, :
Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.
Scott and Howard (the prime founders of Technocracy as a movement outlined its key points
“Register on a continuous 24 hour-per-day basis the total net conversion of energy.
“By means of the registration of energy converted and consumed, make possible a balanced load.
“Provide a continuous inventory of all production and consumption
“Provide a specific registration of the type, kind, etc., of all goods and services, where produced and where used
“Provide specific registration of the consumption of each individual, plus a record and description of the individual.”
Delving deeper into Technocracy one finds an unsettling sense of eugenics along with their call for a sustainable development program including a greening of the environment. Enough that it causes me to wonder if Technocracy adherents were not the money and motivation behind the recently destroyed Georgia Guide Stones https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/nobody-knows-how-to-interpret-this-doomsday-stonehenge-in-georgia-5592082/ of which the first “commandment was to reduce the earth’s population to 500 million ”Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” the rest of the Guide stone commandments could be said to have been pulled straight out of the Technocracy Study Course and would fit well into the Green Party’s stated goals.
The Technocracy of the 1930’s has never disappeared. It has been simmering for the last few decades. It has reappeared as a regular feature of late with many of the articles noting it appears we are rapidly devolving into a Technocrat world and the concerns of the direction we are taking towards that end. Two sources of information on technocracy are: https://technocracy.fandom.com/wiki/Technocracy_Wiki a good quick reference to Technocracy and for a deeper and current analysis of Technocracy and how it is being expressed today Patrick Wood’s Technocracy News https://technocracy.news/ a blog that is update virtually daily.
Having all world governing decisions made by a group of experts equipped with all the facts, except who decides which experts should be empowered and what variant of facts are used?
Originally I had planned to cover more about Technocracy in this video but realised just an introduction for now would be best.
There is a considerable amount confusion about 5G, Some of the statements are at best misleading and in many cases out right wrong. Yes, I have concerns about the harm electromagnetic radiation causes and am concerned about the additional harm that the mmwave portion of 5 G will cause. I also know there is very little mmwave 5G currently deployed anywhere in the world. Canada like many other countries has not even auctioned off the frequencies yet- in the case of Canada the spectrum auction will not occur until 2024 at the earliest. Yes, the 5G frequencies below about 6 Ghz are in use virtually everywhere and yes there are serious health and environmental issues the use of these frequencies has caused.
I know from personal experience the harm that even a short (30 sec or so) exposure to 10 GHz can cause. Look at the left side of my face. The paralysis there is the result of an operation to remove a massive vestibular schwannoma– Usually called an Acoustic Neuroma, a benign tumour in the myelin sheath/Schwann cells of the 8 th cranial nerve. Don’t let the “benign” nature of the tumour mislead lead one to think it is a minor tumour. Over 20 hours of brain surgery in 2 operations and more follow up treatment it is a serious operation that requires the breaking open the skull to conduct the operation and a cumulative total of 6 months ( in my case of time spent in the hospital to recover – my tumour was MASSIVE – the largest I have heard of anyone having and required extra operating and recovery time)”
I had originally planned to explain 5 G in one video but once I started preparing for it realised the topic would quickly overwhelm most people and they would need a break to process the information.
This video will be about the formal definition of 5G as defined and set out in the official protocol documents for 5G, they are part of International Mobile Telecommunications-2020 (IMT-2020 Standard)https://www.itu.int/osg/spu/imt-2000/technology.html under the auspices of 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) reading and understanding the document is heavy reading that few apart from industry people will do.
There is nothing significant about the use of 5 in 5G other than it is a marketing term referring to the 5 th generation of Cell Phone Technology. The next protocol they are currently working on is 6G and scheduled to be deployed starting in 2030 (don’t think they will make that date) and they are even working on developing 7G expected to be deployed in 2040. For me the protocol has only a few essential points to focus on. The new 5G developments include what is referred to as a “beam forming antenna”. In simple terms this means the main beam can be focused into a specific direction. The main advantage for this technology is it at least in theory requires less power to broadcast in a narrow defined cone than broadcasting multi directional, this also will allow more devices to connect through a given antenna.
Other key points re 5G is it is multiple frequencies and the technology is being unleashed on the public in stages making it difficult to really nail down 5 G issues as the occur. The frequencies used and timing of their release will vary between countries. The frequencies are classed into 3 groupings – low, mid and high band frequencies. In most locations world wide the low and mid band frequencies are already in use or being deployed. These frequencies are also grouped into a category called called Frequency Ranges (FR) FR1 is from 0.41 Ghz to 7.125 GHz (10 MHz to 7125 MHz) and FR2 (also referenced as mmwave is from 24.25 GHz to 71 GHz (when I started preparing this a few days ago the upper bound was 52.6 GHz – specs keep being changed now the upper bound is 71 GHZ. Radio frequencies are specified in terms of their cycles per sec or the wave length – the distance the wave travels in 1 sec. The numbers are related by the formulas c = λ · f λ = c / f = c · T f = c / λ where “c” is the speed of light 299,792,458 m/s
λ is the wave length and
f is the frequency in cycles per sec. A look a this spread sheet will give one an idea of the progression of frequencies as the wave length is decreased.
To confuse the discussions even more the various Telcos use their own marketing terms for at times essentially the same sub set of their 5 G usage. Recently Verizon began using the term 5G Ultra Wideband. In the case of Verizon this term refers to the use of a wide frequency >500 MHz. Th wider band opens up the ability to carry more data, unfortunately it also opens up a little studied area of Radio Frequency. The complications the brillion precursor. A discussion of the precursor effects is a complicated discussion quickly getting into the area of Quantum Physics https://scientists4wiredtech.com/what-are-4g-5g/brillouin-precursors/
Another area of Radio Frequency that is part of Quantum Physics is, is radiation a wave or particle.
The answer is it is both according
Several months ago they were predicting Marburg virus to be the next pandemic scheduled for about now or in the fall 2022. Surprised me when the slotted in Monkeypox this spring.
While I can believe Monkeypox is painful and stress for those that get it. It does not appear one with a high mortality rate or at least this variant is not. For now it seems to supplanted the Marburg virus as the big concern. Or was it brought in to keep the hype and noise of a pandemic and the need for vaccines until they were ready to unleash Marburg.
With a mortality rate of almost 90 % usually within 9 days of symptoms. Marburg does appear a reason for serious concern assuming the World Health Narrative on the emergence is Marburg is factual
Alan Cassels is a long-time drug policy researcher who often focuses on how the media reports on medicines. The quality of medical reporting has, according to Mr. Cassels, been steadily going down, and the media reporting on Covid follows that pattern. The magnitude of benefit - and harm - from any drug or vaccine is a vital piece of reporting because the public has a right to know these things and people depend on getting honest information from the media.
One of the most important facts of the Covid pandemic was the Infection Fatality Rate. How many infected people will die from the disease. It was recognized early on that the IFR was, for most age groups, quite low. In the 50 to 60 age group, the IFR was about 0.15% .. or about 1 or 2 people in a thousand who get Covid will die from it and in younger age groups death rate from those who got Covid was virtually zero. It was surprising therefore how many people were quite willing to get the vaccine without ever looking at the real benefits and harms FROM the vaccine - and the actual risks people faced from the disease itself.
Large studies done early on showed that the death rate was HIGHER in the vaccinated groups than in the unvaccinated group. The vaccines 'may' have perhaps prevented some Covid deaths, but even so the total number of deaths in the vaccinated group was shown early on to be higher than in the unvaccinated control groups. And that is what seems to be playing out now. What we are seeing now is a high excess death rate in countries around the world. We are seeing an excess death rate in many countries that is 15% to 20% higher than the long term average death rate, and this is largely from heart attacks, strokes, cancers and etc. And the media is not asking public health people or politicians to explain these deaths. And are the excess deaths in the vaccinated or unvaccinated populations.
A recent study from Spain and the US published in the magazine 'Vaccine' showed an increased risk of 'harm' for the vaccinated. Is getting vaccinated - plus boosting - really a good idea?? The media have largely supported vaccines and boosting, without asking questions or critically looking at the evidence. This is of no benefit to the public; we are being let down and betrayed by the media.