Marg Friesen is a biologist that spent 30 years as a Government of Canada Researcher. Marg speaks to the issues of 5 G or 5th generation Cell Phone Telecommunication. Marg became concerned about Electromagnetic Radiation in general when she heard the Director General of Health Canada tell the parents of children that were getting sick from the wifi installed in their schools there was no science supporting wifi was the cause of the children's illness. Marg knew there was science from 12 years before noting such Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity issues such as headaches nausea, cognitive issues and more. She knew the information on on illnesses associated with electromagnetic fields from electricity. Six months after the Director General of Health Canada spoke on the matter the World Health Organisation’s International Association for Research on Cancer (IRAC) classified Radio Frequency as a Group 2b or Possible carcinogen PRESS RELEASE N° 208 31 May 2011 IARC CLASSIFIES RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AS POSSIBLY CARCINOGENIC TO HUMANS https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf there was a scientist from Health Canada that was on the working group that made the determination. Health Canada knew there was science supporting Radio Frequency including Cell Phone radiation did affect people’s health. She then decided to use her research skills .to determine what Health Canada was not looking at. What she found was very disturbing, Health Canada was turning a blind eye to the available science. After an extensive review of the available information and facts she published (the report is on the Canadian’s 4 safe Technology web site http://c4st.org )WI-FI IN CANADIAN SCHOOLS: A HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE https://c4st.org/wi-fi-in-canadian-schools-a-health-and-safety-issue/ The report documents 50 peer reviewed studies that show adverse effects of exposures below the limits in Safety Code 6 (SC6) In 2013 Health Canada along with the Royal Society of Canada did what they called was a “weight of evidence” review of the effects of radiation and an update of SC6. When Health Canada is pressed on their weight of evidence review they send people to the World Health’s IARC and the industry funded International Commission on NonIonzing Radiation(ICNIRP). Both those organisations deem the heating effects of radiation to be the only harm caused by exposure and do not look at the biological effects of sub-thermal intensities. Despite the thousands of studies that report serious sub thermal effects of radiation. How can that many studies be wrong? The challenges of those with the Environmental Sensitivity called Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) are a continuing concern for her. ..........................

Electohypersensetivity, electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) by either name is a condition that affects in the order of 30% of the population. For some the symptoms are not severe and for an unfortunate few can be debilitating preventing them from taking part in what we view as normal daily activities. Professor (emeritus) Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University in Peterborough, Ontario and Sheena Symington present a slide show and discuss Electromagnetic hypersensetivity in an electro smog filled world – how to improve your world and benefit your health. The presentation done on World Electrosensetivity Day June 16, looks at the wide variety of symptoms one with EHS may experience. Common symptoms difficulty sleeping, chronic fatigue, chronic pain, mood disorders, cognitive disorders, visual disruptions, hearing disorders, heart palpitations, skin problems and excessive night time urination. The presentation includes a look at scientific papers published on the topic including Santini’s Symptoms experienced by those live in the vicinity of a cellular base station. The effects of a short exposure to wifi on ones blood

Thank you Dr. Golomb for publicly reporting symptoms and experiences of a “mystery illness” afflicting American and Canadian diplomats in Cuba and China strongly matched known effects of pulsed radiofrequency/microwave electromagnetic (RF/MW) radiation. When many of those with Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity first heard of the “mysterious illnesses” we suspected as much. We eagerly anticipate the release of your report. It very much sounds like it is an update of what is known as the “Moscow Signal” when the Soviet Union was bombarding the US embassy with electromagnetic radiation. The study into the incident is also know as the “ Lilienfeld Study”. The incident was formally investigated by Dr Lilienfeld leading a team of investigators from John Hopkins University. His study, The Lilienfeld, Study (Lilienfeld AM, Tonascia J. Tonascia S. et al.Foreign Service Health Status Study. Final report contract no. 6025-619037 (NTS publication PB-288163). Washington, DC.: Department of State, has never been released to the public, although researchers since then have had access to it, and they have published papers. The Soviet Union began bombarding the US embassy in Moscow with what the west would call low levels of radiation; levels that while well with in the ICNIRP limits exceeded the Soviet Union acceptable levels that could be radiated to their citizens. Sometime after the exposures started the US government became aware of the radiation but chose to say nothing and allow their staff to be radiated for a number of years so they could see what would happen. Had they informed the world of the situation earlier it is probable I would not have been exposed to a massive amount of radiation while working for the province of BC and been involved with a multi year struggle with WorksafeBC (the BC name for WCB) a struggle to have them look at the facts and cause of my brain tumour. Typical for many WCB’s they seem to feel if the deny the science then they can justify denying the claim. How many others world wide have been injured by radiation since the governments of the world knew of the radiation in Moscow? While the Soviet Union radiated and the US government sat on their hands watching to see what happened to their staff. The embassy staff and families reported a number of health issues attributed to the exposure. The most serious health issue was probably leukemia, among others at least 2 ambassadors came down with leukemia. Other staff reported a number of other diagnosed illnesses, at levels far higher than was typically observed in a similar demographic group in the general population or other embassies. During the “height of the incident the US government ruled out using exact reprisal against the Soviet Union. Exact reprisal would have meant radiating the Soviet Embassy in Washington DC. An act the US government ruled out calling it "immoral." (Hearings on Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1967 Before the Senate Commerce Committee, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess., Part 2 at 963 (1968) (herein- after cited as 1968 Hearings); BUREAU OP RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH, SYMPOSIUM ON THE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND HEALTH IMPLICATIONS OP MICROWAVE RADIATION, June 1970, Print by the Department of H.E.W. (hereinafter cited as SYMPOSIUM) A cell tower will radiate local residents with many times more radiation than the US government considered immoral to radiate the Washington DC Soviet Union Embassy. It is not reasonable to believe that when the reports of the mysterious illnesses were first made that the governments of Canada and the US did not suspect electromagnetic radiation may be the cause. Could the reason be the intensities of radiation were substantially below the inadequate industry protecting allowable levels in Canada and the US. It appears the Cuban and Chinese radiation may have a substantial difference between the current and the historical Soviet Union in 1972. Dr. Golomb mentions pulsed radiation in the current cases. One of the biggest inadequacies of the current ICNIRP based limits as used by Canada in its “Safety Code 6” is the lack of recognising that pulsed radiation is more biologically active than constant wave radiation. Modern Cell Phones and other connection devices use a pulsed radiation. Not mentioned in the news release is modulated signals which cell phones etc signals use today. Research by Dr Carl Blackman and others has suggested that modulation of the signal will have an affect too. It appears the US government did not learn from the mistake of allowing the Soviets to radiate their Moscow embassy in the past and are now doomed to repeat the same mistake today – some never learn from history and are condemned to repeat it.-