ARCON x: R Pyramids lying, Extra-subjective? Confederate jingoism Laying all about.
The idea that the Archon which is said to 'deny the emergent order' instead of seeing the archon as a longitudinal line which tugs on the 'identification of one's subject" which is a latitude (CF's new attitude) I gayly imagine whilst I de-scribe that a bridge or arch between objects-of-the-mind and words-of-the-mind do not always have to be fore-seen as an "inter-subjective monologue". And in cases where one's monologue is not seen or seen only as a recursive necessity an Intersubjective-object-of-being is still more than just the mind. It is our body and body of being.
An Archy, An Archon and the lie of "the intersubjective standard". Is the emerging ordering of things never prescriptive? always prescriptive? And is the recording of word series , orders not an expression of an anachronism dead or denied finding its response to the world in word form of syntax vocalized expression, not now a video-recorded art of literature?
Or have you never looked through your lens backwards?
Persuading or attempting to control "the emergent narrative" with your 'central plan' is a Lie????
Isn't the laying of a lie like making it snow by shoot sodium into clouds. And when it's snowing is that new lie not laying behaving and being... At least in the civil social sense, not in.
Oh, I used to be an anarchist and a statist and that whole statism anarchy thing is so passe
Everybody wants to rule the world. but are they missing falsehood or lack of 'that description. no" that description.
Is ConferderalSocialist not talking about himself somewhere in this video because that is what he apprehends for his future but is not yet arrived at the momentum of his pre-scriptive dialogues for what he fears of his own becoming? or am I wrong here?
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vHtrDx_kwg