When the first part of ALPonz was put up for the chop by 'Volentary Administration' following Kulvir Singh Virk the alleged meeting Bijal Shah and Nimish Patel at a social function. This story changed later. Plants operated the Delphi Technique in a very obvious and effective manner. There will be more similar meetings in the ALPonz saga and these techniques WILL be employed again, whoever chairs the meetings. _*"THE FALSE ACCUSATION AND HOW IT WORKS"*_ 1. It's 'limited hang out'--- people look at _it, the accusation by the cointelpro_, then not at other things which are much more expansive; and, 2. It makes all such accusations look as stupid as my skit at Ben Fellows People who've been watching's opinion becomes that Ben Fellows actually works for them to give them looney cover, or, as the allegedly 'late' Lord Alistair---pedo---McAlpine would say (and actively practised with the SallyBercowPsiOp, where she made insinuations that he was one, then admitted being totally wrong and said that he was totally innocent, then paying him a massive ammount of money (probably she didn't pay anything in reality) in his book, there's great value in the _"False Accusation"_, where you get someone who you control to make accusations which are so easily rubbished, that no one ever feels comfortable bringing the whole thing up again. I've done some videos on this very subject, which might help anyone understand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcqKr-srYAs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqZoyOiy1cM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gO84ee0RcAs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdKj9BAF9UY Look up the Description and the people involved. Ben Fellows was in court yesterday for his insanely obviously false accusaions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSWgMV1HUp8 A worked example of this happening, concerning Jimmy Savile, after he was dead to make it look like he was after young women and not young children: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeT5OdBHe1M And here's a lower profile example of it happening, with something to do with a conman who works for a law firm, who was doing the same thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnybO5ba_ys ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34Ewy153P9I

I've been looking at Chris Spivey's site for eighteen months or so, but his moderators all of a sudden started to attack people for making fairly tame comments which were neither disrespectful, abusive, or obscene in their content (which is the apparent only reason for him considering blocking people, but which they do most days). They made false accusations of things that I and others had said, and then put them down---saying that they were beyond the pale, having wrongly quoted them (and after removing their comment, not considering that these had been saved following their first, pre-block warnings and removal of a comment), accused them of calling them paedophiles, amongst other things, and, all this with zero efforts to address what their problems were with the commenter. All this with a load of crude obscenity. The stupid thing is then they criticised an email which I'd sent to Chis, offering to assist him with his litterary and word processing style from a long time back, saying that I just kept not getting the message that they weren't interested. Ironically, I had even spoken to Chis, telling him that he would get flack for harassment and the process that they have to follow, so all of the idiot things he did, were despite someone telling him the exact situation, which moving on past the date of this video, it is clear that he still hasn't taken on board---and keeps going on about "indictable" and that he was "arrested". It was all with his consent, which he's got the audacity to have a whole section of his site about, cou----------------wd Common Law. As with most things, Chris relies too heavily on the much criticised Daily Mail, and other troowf sites, with nameless authoers, who write about nothing other than what they've picked up from other ones---"documenid!" They, uncharacteristically started to attack anyone who said anything re. paedophiles mainly being a danger to children from broken homes and that single mothers' children were prime targets. They went so far as to fabricate a story that someone blamed them (they allege) large increase in paedophilia on single mothers who are idiots, which no one had said, so they were acting really desperately. Where they've changed things, this is sometimes recoded. The three site moderators were all at it, and it was, as I've said, out of character. I have to say I had seen them abuse people in the past, but very rarely and not lots of people in one set of comments. Something strange is happening here, and I think the fact that they're all of a sudden Bill Maloney's best friends and protectors is very suspicious. I hope Chris is simply being taken advantage of, but can't presume this to be the case on the face of it. The link to the pro ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNTiqZ-cE64