I recently had occasion to view a speech given by an Australian gentleman by the name of Joel Davis, which he gave at a meeting of the Patriotic Alternative in the UK. You can find the speech in full on their website, and I encourage the listener to give it their consideration so that I cannot be accused of taking the man out of context, because I found the talk more than a little bit disagreeable, and mean here to use it as an example to describe a broader pathology plaguing what has been called the "Dissident Right". Mr. Davis is hardly alone in his view that race is the central question of our politics. To whatever extent this may be in error, you could easily forgive a man for making it, given the hysteria surrounding the subject in our discourse these days. Mr. Davis, however, is altogether less forgiving of those who disagree with his view, describing, for example, Germans who do not vote for AfD as "politically retarded", along with the rest of the "masses", without much effort to understand or articulate their motives. Met with this realization that the political parties he supports do not win elections, Mr. Davis seeks different and altogether less precise measurements of success. His talk was titled "Activist Politics and White Advocacy" and "The Amazing Joel Davis" as he was described, was introduced as "an identitarian commentator and activist with a focus on white advocacy and political strategy". As he begins to speak himself, he states that he is to share his thoughts on the subject of "political strategy" that have evolved for him over the last few years. But if Mr. Davis has a focus on political strategy, it was not presented here. Mr. Davis would go on to make no subtle suggestion that electoral politics was a futile endeavor, though he was careful to state that it is "not bad". Specifically stating that "unless we can raise billions of dollars" White advocates cannot compete in this realm. He describes "activism" as a different category of action, the purpose of which is to "change what's popular", whereas "electoralism", as he calls it, makes use of what already is popular. The flaws in this are many. Some quite subtle, some quite glaring. None at all rare. The talk has value in his articulating these flawed ideas in a manner more befitting a response than much of the less articulate hurling of insults and subterfuge common to this phenomenon. I have much to say on this, plus your calls at 217-688-1433 SurrealPolitiks airs live every Monday at 9:30pm US Eastern.

We're going to try something a little different this time, and I'm not entirely sure how well it will work.  Once again, the GOP is trying to compete with us for attention. They have scheduled the final Presidential Primary debate for 8pm, and we're set to start at 9:30, so there will be a scheduling conflict.  Unless... I'll start tonight at 7:45pm US Eastern. 15 minutes before the debate begins. I will carry the debate on the stream, and I will provide commentary throughout. You are welcome to do so as well, as long as you are in the member chat.  As long as people are interested to continue, I'll keep going after the debate is over.  And there's a lot going on.  Apparently the Israeli stock market saw a huge uptick in short selling just before the October 7th attacks, indicating that people knew about the attacks in advance and traded on that knowledge.  Trump was on Sean Hannity last night joking about becoming a dictator, and the Left is losing their minds. I'm just hoping it wasn't a joke, personally. My interview with LowEndBox.com just dropped. This is probably the most in depth interview I've ever done, which is kinda nuts since this is a site about web hosting.

SurrealPolitiks.com premium members gain access to our members only video chat feature, which the host joins every Wednesday at 9:30pm US Eastern Time. We live stream the host's video feed to Odysee for those who prefer to subscribe here, but for now, audience participation is limited to SurrealPolitiks.com members. The host will check the chat here from time to time, and try to answer your questions.

When a transgender mass murderer walked into a Christian school and began gunning down the young and the elderly, it did not take much imagination to discern that the maniac's political views could charitably be described as Left of center. The announcement that a manifesto had been left behind, and the conspicuous effort to keep its contents a secret, left no room for doubt. This was certainly a Biden voter going off script. Nearly 8 months later, someone appears to have gotten fed up with the secrecy, and three pages have been leaked to non other than Stephen Crowder, a once famous conservative media personality now best known for sending photographs of his genitalia to male staffers. The killer, born Audrey Hale, surprisingly enough, says nothing about religion in the pages thus far leaked. Nothing about "politics" from a party or policy perspective. Hale, who appears to be White, is instead exercising a racial animus against White people. The female killer, whose minds was this point warped by taking male sex hormones,  aimed to deprive these "little crackers" with their "mop yellow hair" of their "white privilege" by gunning them down before they were even old enough to pick their gender. Then going by the name of Aiden, Hale walked into the school with an AR-15 with the hopes that she would "have a high death count" and fully expected to die. She took six lives before police granted her own death wish. Democrats, you might have guessed, alternated between pretending the shooting didn't occur or blaming the gun. There was no mention of "hate" or really any discussion of motive at all outside those darkest recesses of the Internet and briefly on the Tucker Carlson show. With the motive exposed, you might think the constant beat of war drums against White America would get a second look, but you would be wrong. The reaction was captured well by one Twitter account called DC Draino, who said, as if in parody; It shows how Leftist ideology radicalized a Trans shooter to murder Christian children This was political terrorism & the Biden regime tried to cover it up We will not be silent after these children were slaughtered That's amusing in the extreme... "We will not be silent". My friend, there are worse crimes than silence, you know. Sometimes, if you have nothing true to say, you should just say nothing at all. There is no mention of a religious animus in the manifesto thus far released. It might be a safe assumption, but this is not the news of the day. There is no mention of politics, and though this may too be a safe assumption, that the killer was not a participant in many Republican Primaries, the headline is, this killer was racially motivated to murder White children.