I synced the videos found at https://securevotega.com/ to the explanation given by Gabriel Sterling of the Georgia Secretary of State's Office at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrUdSl4uvaM The most significant claim being debunked by this video was made by Trump in the conference call with Raffensperger, where Trump said: " Late in the morning, they went early in the morning they went to the table with the black robe, the black shield and they pulled out the votes. Those votes were put there a number of hours before the table was put there. I think it was, Brad you would know, it was probably eight hours or seven hours before and then it was stuffed with votes. They weren't in an official voter box, but they were in what looked to be suitcases or trunks, suitcases but they weren't in voter boxes. The minimum number it could be because we watched it and they watched it certified in slow motion instant replay if you can believe it but slow motion and it was magnified many times over and the minimum it was 18,000 ballots, all for Biden." ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwOlzoBpdwQ

The recently released video showing a rotating UFO looks very odd. There too much detail rotating. Could it be that the craft is NOT rotating, and it's just a rotation of the much larger infrared glare, caused by the rotating window in front of the camera? Note the glare in my experiment is white. The IR camera is set to black being hot, which increases the illusion that it's a physical object. I don't claim this solves anything, or that it applies to anything other than the "GIMBAL" video shown here. Nor does it explain what the craft actually is. It's simply a reasonable hypothesis for why it appears to be rotating. For more discussion see: https://www.metabunk.org/nyt-video-of-u-s-navy-jet-encounter-with-unknown-object.t9333/ Source of the A340 "peanut" analysis: https://www.metabunk.org/explained-chilean-navy-ufo-video-aerodynamic-contrails-flight-ib6830.t8306/ ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcsAZTKRv5E