In this video I share some of the major events that affected me in ways most people cannot even imagine.

I produced the first rigorous solution to the tangent line problem, not Newton or Leibniz or any of the lackeys and fools who came later. Newton and Leibniz were groping around in the dark using brute force methods that made sense "intuitively" (very dangerous way of doing things!) but lacked any rigour. Their methods are proof that they did not understand calculus at a sufficiently profound level. The connection between derivative and integral remained hazy until my New Calculus: drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO Link to where Prof. Don Redmond (redmond@siu.edu) claims my theorem was known: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/LYEhpApA0sg/m/dM-GuQW0CAAJ My historic geometric theorem: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj Applet to verify that it works on any smooth function: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6UNpZSEEsbG14eAFCPv8p03pv Greek version of applet: https://drive.google.com/file/d/120g3VfFFqAzyZWHzHljXZYuWYpl5kUDB I included the above link because a Greek professor of mathematics (Mihalis Lamvros) dared to call me a "crank". See here: https://www.mathematica.gr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=65422 How it fixes the bogus mainstream definition of integral: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y Labarre's Intermediate Analysis: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aABeT9e57630Bq90R6pJaCN8wBaNvuup On page 118, Labarre makes his first attempt at defining "differentiability" using "neighbourhoods". What idiot mainstream math academics still haven't come to terms with, is that you can't prove differentiability without assuming it. In 6.2, the fool Labarre uses a Taylor expansion. To say "Let f be differentiable" is absolutely circular. There he writes: f(p) = f(q) + f'(q) (p-q) + a(q,p) (p-q) Implies ( f(p)-f(q) ) / (p-q) = f'(q) + a(q,p) If we let p=x+h and q=x then: ( f(x+h)-f(x) ) / h = f'(x) + a(x,x+h) which is decidedly NOT the same as my identity: (f(x+h)-f(x) )/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h) since x =/= x+h. But small details aside (which mainstream academics normally miss because they do not pay attention to detail!), Labarre's text is full of errors of circularity. That Labarre noticed the extra term is the difference in slope was pure accident because if he realised its importance, he would have made the connection to the definite integral. He did not! Important: You CANNOT use ANY of the methods of calculus without assuming a SMOOTH function, meaning there that over any given interval, we call a function smooth IF AND ONLY IF, it is possible to produce no more than one tangent line at any point in the given interval, where tangent line is defined sensibly (and not circularly as in the mainstream) as a line that meets in one point, extends t ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9S16hNi3Cj0