LBRY Block Explorer

LBRY Claims • 132150

1c9e28ce6a8c5f1f12ea81f9b8fbcab2c7498796

Published By
Created On
4 Jun 2021 14:24:12 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
The Little Republic: Masculinity and Domestic Authority in Eighteenth-Century Britain
Author: Karen Harvey
File Type: pdf
The relationship between men and the domestic in eighteenth-century Britain has been obscured by two well-established historiographical narratives. The first charts changes in domestic patriarchy, founded on political patriarchalism in the early modern period and transformed during the eighteenth century by new types of family relationship rooted in contract theory. The second describes the emergence of a new kind of domestic interior during the long eighteenth century, a home infused with a new culture of domesticity primarily associated with women and femininity. The Little Republic shifts the terms of these debates, rescuing the engagement of men with the house from obscurity, and better equipping historians to understand masculinity, the domestic environment, and domestic patriarchy. Karen Harvey explores how men represented and legitimized their domestic activities. She considers the relationship between discourses of masculinity and domesticity, and whether there was a particularly manly attitude to the domestic. In doing so, Harvey suggests that home is too narrow a concept for an understanding of eighteenth-century domestic experience. Instead, focusing on the house foregrounds a different domestic culture, one in which men and masculinity were central. Reconstructing mens experiences of the domestic as shaped by their own and others beliefs, assumptions and expectations, Harvey argues for the continuation of a model of domestic patriarchy and also that effective domestic patriarchs remained important to late-eighteenth-century political theory. It was a discourse of oeconomy - the practice of managing the economic and moral resources of the household for the maintenance of good order - that shaped mens attitudes towards and experiences in the house. Oeconomy combined day-to-day and global management of people and resources it was a meaningful way of defining masculinity and established the house a key component of a manly identity that operated across the divide of inside and outside the house. Significantly for histories of the home which so often narrate a process of privatization and feminization, oeconomy brought together the home and the world, primarily through mens domestic management.
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
application/pdf
Language
English
Open in LBRY

More from the publisher

Controlling
THE M
Controlling
PAINT
Controlling
CONSU
Controlling
HASID
Controlling
VOLUN
Controlling
DECON
Controlling
THE M
Controlling
THE C
Controlling
SECRE