We speak to Tara Houska, Tribal attorney and land defender. She discusses the Line 3 Pipeline expansion, which would bring almost a million barrels of tar sands per day from Alberta, Canada to Wisconsin, how the pipeline breaks treaties signed with Native American tribes and further erases indigenous history, the need for the Biden administration to stop the pipeline expansion in the fight against climate change and much more! #Line3Pipeline #ClimateChange #IndigenousRights LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT SUBSCRIBE to Going Underground https://t.me/joinchat/VBZAzIWb6OWMpKLy?fbclid=IwAR1oBuFpFRH1JSjSugRCrWAmrhRI064ai2hls_z35ldYsRK0RSJykjm8-Ds FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/underground_rt We contacted Enbridge about the allegations in this show and they said: “Existing Line 3 is one of several Enbridge pipelines that currently cross all of northern Minnesota and have coexisted with its Native communities and the most productive wild rice waters in the nation for over 70 years. The two Native nations crossed by Line 3, the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe both support the replacement project which will restore the pipeline’s original design capacity, not expand it. An extensive Tribal Cultural Resource Survey of the entire route of the pipeline helped inform over 320 changes to the project’s route – which follows existing pipelines, electric lines and utility corridors. The replacement of Line 3 is the most studied pipeline in state history, which after six years has included a 13,500 page Environmental Impact Statement, 70 public input hearings, four separate reviews by independent administrative law judges, multiple reviews and approvals from the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (The only Tribe with “Treatment as a State” water quality authority along the pipeline route). The project is now being built under the supervision of tribal monitors with authority to stop construction, who ensure that important cultural resources are protected. The replacement of existing Line 3 is a safety and maintenance focused project that was ordered and noted in a federal consent decree during the Obama Administration. Work has already been completed in Canada, North Dakota, Wisconsin and is approaching 50% completion in Minnesota. The project is providing significant economic benefits for counties, small businesses, Native American communities, and union members – including crea ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2KY4uO8pxs

We speak to Prof. Calum Semple, a member of the SAGE Committee that advises Boris Johnson. He discusses the changing pattern of hospitalisations with younger people including children filling up hospitals rather than the elderly, the growing threat of ‘long COVID’ causing additional health problems for those who have recovered from the initial infection and the damage caused by COVID to internal organs during hospitalisation, reports of the U.K. government considering rolling out vaccinations to 12-15 year olds and why the case for vaccinating children is growing stronger, whether we will see a new British variant as lockdowns restrictions have been lifted with much of the population still not fully vaccinated and much more! #Coronavirus #COVID19 #Vaccine LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT SUBSCRIBE to Going Underground https://t.me/joinchat/VBZAzIWb6OWMpKLy?fbclid=IwAR1oBuFpFRH1JSjSugRCrWAmrhRI064ai2hls_z35ldYsRK0RSJykjm8-Ds FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/underground_rt We contact Dr. Ahmed Elgazzar about the allegations made in this show about Ivermectin and he said: “1-Have you corresponded with Research Square about the retraction? My answer,yes I sent mail to Research Square on Jul 20 and received reply on Jul 21 from the site, regret and apologize for that. They informed me, the subject is under investigation. 2- Sentences in the introduction with very similar wording to other published work. My answer, It is a norm for researchers, when writing scientific papers, read each other’s publications. Often phrases are commonly used, including the whole sentence and referenced . Unless the whole long paragraph is copied, accusing plagiarism in a phrase or a sentence that is commonly used is lame. 3-- Raw data samples that appear to be duplicated (patients have identical data and initials) My answer , this is not mine,my raw data are coded, protected, kept under lock and key, and not allowed to be retrieved from electronic system, during and after the trial. The retrieval system is well protected. 4--The research was simply sent to research square for presentation on open digital platforms dedicated to the pre-print process. It is known (and surely the Guardian knows this!!!) that preprint sites are dedicated to presenting scientific research to the scientific community in order to take opinions, notes and comments in preparation for correcting errors and modifying the text and then sending it to a refereed journal in preparation for its publication. All preprint sites put on their homepage a notice “that the research published on the site is only preprint and did not take the status of ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtjvYGBLajE