georgia-sos-found-duplicate-ballot
ATLANTA, GA, MAY 8, 2024 – The Georgia State Election Board (SEB) refused yesterday afternoon to refer the most important case in its history to the Attorney General (AG) for investigation and prosecution. The SEB heard evidence in its quarterly meeting of over 140 violations of Georgia law and rules allegedly committed by Fulton County in processing electronic results during the 2020 election.
The violations stemmed from complaint SEB2023-025 which identified up to 58,924 ballots cast and counted that had no source justification. Specific allegations with some possible overlaps are:
20,713 ballots with certified votes have no source tabulator from which they should have originated;
17,852 ballots with certified votes had no ballot images that are required for vote tabulation;
17,234 unsourced votes found after certification and used to balance audit results;
3,125 double scanned and double counted ballots
Cut and Paste URL to Read Article:
www.thethinkingconservative.com/state-election-board-refuses-to-refer-140-fulton-2020-violations-to-attorney-general-for-investigation-and-prosecution
https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/state-election-board-refuses-to-refer-140-fulton-2020-violations-to-attorney-general-for-investigation-and-prosecution/
Jan Johnston: But that the report, the allegation is, from Mr. Rossi, that 3,125 Google cast ballots were counted. I'm not talking about the ICC 14 scanner, that, that ballots were misnamed and reloaded on it. I'm talking about 3125 duplicate ballots that were counted.
Charlene McGowan: And again, as we concluded and it's in the report, we did partially substantiate that we believe that there are duplicate ballot images. Whether or not those were actually included in the tabulated results is inconclusive.
Jan Johnston: Well, how, what do you believe? What do you believe?
John Fervier: Let me ask a question. You, you've made a comment that you didn't know if they were included, but you just told me that you had three different counts that came up substantially, one of them was a hand recount. So if there were duplicate ballots, they would have shown in the hand recount, along with the other two.
Charlene McGowan: I think that's a reasonable assumption, also, because the the results of the recount were actually lower, somewhat lower, marginally lower, than the originally certified result. So if you had 3000 ballots that were counted twice, you would expect the results to be larger by that amount.
John Fervier: Right.
Jan Johnston: Right. So in the hand recount, in the hand count, Governor Kemp's team found 6653 errors or duplicates. So, and that was in the count, and the totals were given, and to my knowledge, those count totals have never been amended or, or reversed. And likewise, the 3125 that Mr. Rossi found, are duplicate counted ballots. Can I ask Mr. Rossi, is, am I stating, I, am I interpreting this correct? . . .
Joe Rossi: . . . Can you a . . .
Janice Johnston: Please give, in two minutes
Joe Rossi : Two minutes. Two minutes. Okay. I'm an expert on the hand audit, Okay. And as Doctor Johnson said, it's been vetted and found factual by Governor Kemp's team who investigated it for over six weeks. The numbers did match. You're right, Mr. Chairman. The reason they matched is because they include the duplicated, duplicated, counted ballots. The duplicates are over 6000. The net difference for candidate Biden are 4000 4081 net false absentee ballots counted for candidate Biden over candidate Trump in the hand audit. And that is only a subset of the 527,000 that were looked at. That was only the 148,000 absentee ballots. For those that you do math, if you do 4000 4081 and divided by 148,000, that's almost a 3%, much more than a fraction, a 3% error rate. So to answer your question, yes, the hand audit got 527. But how they got 527 was over 6000 duplicated, and the net difference being 4081 for candidate Biden. I hope that clarifies this for the board.
Jan Johnston: Thank you.
Sara Tindall Ghazal: Excuse me. This has been adjudicated and the numbers are entirely different that were, that were found by our investigators two years ago. I cannot let those numbers stand on the record because they are incorrect, and our investigators found numbers and it was in the hundreds, not in the thousands.
Joe Rossi: I know this is not meant to be . . .
Sara Tindall Ghazal: No, sir, I'm sorry.
Joe Rossi: This is not meant to be a back and forth, but when Doctor Johnson asked the investigators, when they did their investigation, tell me, tell me the totality of the errors. You can go back and look at the transcript. Investigator Sigorn? said, and you can almost quote me, we did not go into that for this investigation. Look at the transcript, please.
SUPPORT TheThinkingConservative.com!!!
Cut and Paste URL:
www.thethinkingconservative.com/donate-to-the-thinking-conservative
https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/donate-to-the-thinking-conservative/
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McAJ5T46smI
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English