Published By
Created On
26 Apr 2020 08:32:33 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
2of4 Word for Anton
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Everett
video: http://fora.tv/2009/03/20/Daniel_Everett_Endangered_Languages_and_Lost_Knowledge
Anton dismisses a Transcendental God, but sustains the ontic (philosophical) logical correlation with the "natural ordering" as it parallels onto theology.
Difference means to separate ontology from onto theology, by misspelling a textual word hence, not being 'a word in the language' but functioning amidst words . Differance is to neither differ or point to difference but to open the medium of the convention of the read. This is to say the convention of reading left to right, one 'element' of the language connected to the next. So the non word 'acts' as a word in one case and is an invariable in another case. The point of this is to unroot the embedded convention of the read. To unroot the rudimentary elements, to unroot or free the rudiments, hence losing the recursive "nature" (which is not natural to language at all but appears that way because it is found abounding about english speakers). The Piraha people speak with no recursion, and time and categorization is not time bound the way cory would have us follow.
And following is so important to cory because it allows more authorial clout. From which he can administer a type of oratorial sophistication to orient the listener to his way of approaching the language, whilst buttressing his perspective with cherry picked selections from other authors, ... to further his cause or consideration, which I'm not yet aware of where he is taken us.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wO2_832GV8
video: http://fora.tv/2009/03/20/Daniel_Everett_Endangered_Languages_and_Lost_Knowledge
Anton dismisses a Transcendental God, but sustains the ontic (philosophical) logical correlation with the "natural ordering" as it parallels onto theology.
Difference means to separate ontology from onto theology, by misspelling a textual word hence, not being 'a word in the language' but functioning amidst words . Differance is to neither differ or point to difference but to open the medium of the convention of the read. This is to say the convention of reading left to right, one 'element' of the language connected to the next. So the non word 'acts' as a word in one case and is an invariable in another case. The point of this is to unroot the embedded convention of the read. To unroot the rudimentary elements, to unroot or free the rudiments, hence losing the recursive "nature" (which is not natural to language at all but appears that way because it is found abounding about english speakers). The Piraha people speak with no recursion, and time and categorization is not time bound the way cory would have us follow.
And following is so important to cory because it allows more authorial clout. From which he can administer a type of oratorial sophistication to orient the listener to his way of approaching the language, whilst buttressing his perspective with cherry picked selections from other authors, ... to further his cause or consideration, which I'm not yet aware of where he is taken us.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wO2_832GV8
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
Unspecified
More from the publisher
Controlling
VIDEO
PAINT
paintin-dee-sy-lent-mov-ee
a newbie in sketch modey
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6PMzDIycuE
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
MORE
more-on-political-policy-ideas-september
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8U5sgdPGbA
Transaction
Created
3 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
SARAH
sarah-palin-is-as-dumb-as-a-shit-house
After exhaustive linguist data crunching analyzed by our firm, we have determined that Sarah Palin's speech is on par with almost any shit house rat
( This video is meant to pun Sarah Palin's response to Katie Couric's question about Mccain's "...pushing for more regulation". Palin responded with "I'll try to find you some examples and bring them to ya".) I never actually ran any "numbers" on Sarah Palin Vids, as I never actually got the position at the firm which I note. Although firms like this exist.
See folks, even I can make myself seem qualified for a position which I am not. )
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvarWjcnf0Q
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
PAINT
painting-philosophy-2-more
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzWCofXo4mQ
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
THE T
the-truth-determined-apodictic-or
ANTHOPROMORPHIC or ANTHROPRECENTRIC
Oh hee hee. because we speak we recognize we are human.
But we also SEE & HEAR like the animals. When one is not rational or hearing their inner monologue can't they still respond to animal expressions as, yet another, species does? This doesn't deny our species but our necessary Locution of being one of our species is, at these times, not in question.
What does it mean to identify? To facilitate or react to Anton's video or any video if not a practice of persons?
Animal's don't procure theories of mind, but what do they do that we can only speculate upon.
-How is "the autobiography of a wolf" ever to be written by a wolf? It obviously has to be WRITTEN by a person. So is the imaging of such ideas NOT comparable to a what a wolf images? Certainly, we don't deny the eyes and ears of a wolf? Certainly we notice a canine hearing events we do not hear. We notice canines noticing us. Responding to our phonics our motions & our emotions.
To say because we are required to be anthroprocentric because we are human, then leads OTHERS to detail what the limits of our centrism to be.
I feel like an icecream today. I feel like a square.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyXqS9NKAiU
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
SUFFE
suffering-is-not-always-a-bad-response
Suffering is NOT Always (a) Bad. Response to Trick. December 2, 2013
A response to the contention that suffering is always a bad ie. (bad(suffering)).
I say that this is a static argument that is applicable and true, but not always true, not always the case. That there are cases in which (suffering) exists by itself without evaluative properties, namely goodness & badness. And that there are also intersecting sets of our experience and conscious being such that suffering is mostly a bad, but with exceptions, ie. (ba(d, suffer)ing) , where the "ing" are the segment away from evaluation which is "not-bad".
I also contend that there is an intersection between goodness & badness in which we live through. In one case we recognize the evaluative sets as being dissonant with one another. And another case where there is simply a (good, badness) as a singular sensation and not in dissonance.
a tangent: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l95D7leeU3w
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDWSYziAgeo
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
PAINT
painting-kate-tempest-mash-up-dospook
A short video on my other channel. I was going to do a super long stream but some prick entered my video, via the link I posted and he kicked me. Anyway, this is still a cool mash-up and evidence of my darkening the painting.
The other night I let the computer read my unpublished, not yet finished book on Contradiction, and it was flagged by youtube or some individual. So I appealed. now i'm streaming on my Michael Fahl channel.
Maestro movie link goes public on Feb 3rd.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8MQ2BNv9pM
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
AUTHO
authority-tax-deconstruction-stefbot-9
This video is the last video in this series of deconstructing stefan molyneux. Hopefully all viewers see at least a displacement of stefbot's central tenants as not existing as "Truth" beyond the contextual gravities of his work.
This video deals with, what I think to be, the biggest problem with stefbots DRO theory found in his book Practical Anarchy, which he himself does not resolve.
I also deal with his claim of UPB universally preferable behavior, being but another power structure from which all that he criticizes about the state, would apply. Lastly, to play along with Stefbot's contentions I add a pretext to his tax = force, which is that Authority=tax. This hopefully shows that his Practical positions as they stand only in rhetoric are undermined by the Authority of rhetoric itself, and that taxation is but an imposed rule upon our physical beings which we inherit from a power structure, which is not unlike following the rules of our work-a-day grammar or rationality, as an inherited power structure.
Stefan wants freedom but ultimately adheres to the coercive nature of currency exchange due to it's ease, without regards to its adherences to authority and coercion of the value and definition. Some standardization is required in (almost) all courses of human interaction and life. And any standard enforces it's internality and penalizes it's externality so to speak, and so standards, rule following or obeying a rule is coercive and hence that which is coerced is, at least for that time, being enslaved.
Authority = slavery, whether his, ours, yours or otherwise.
Of course stefbot will make a convolution of words, not unlike myself, in order to reclaim other's focus into the realm of one's rhetorical structures.
NOW IT'S TIME FOR SOME ART!
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWp-yhlGm8g
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
Controlling
VIDEO
THE I
the-imposition-argument-is-dead-part-3-5
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGjLVAuYvOE
Transaction
Created
4 weeks ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4