Credit goes to Alt Hype. To crystalize why spawktalk's argument is silly, let me analogize to a nuclear physicist. The nuclear physicist has these fringe theories. Crazy theories. He's called a nut. It is pointed out to him that there are many things that could go wrong, and only a few that could go right, and non-experimental speculation - even among nuclear physicists - is notoriously poor at predicting outcomes. But he doesn't demand the building on several nuclear reactors based on his theories straight away. He first wants experimentation. And then spawktalk comes along and says: "Oh yeah, well I don't think you'll even get your experimental funding, and even if you do the experiment could be ill-conceived!" That's what Spawktalk is doing with polycentric law, in addition to several on-case criticisms which I think are full of poop. Spawktalk made what I shall dub "The Methodological Argument Against Radical Politics", which works in many instances, but at the inception of this it wasn't conceived of as a rebuttal to my dictatorship argument. But now he's trying to apply it to my dictatorship of the polycentricat, but it doesn't work, it wasn't designed to.