Having put some uploads up a couple of days back, it seems that there must have been more people involved with the planning and execution of the Woolwich Hoax from TfL's Surface Transport sections. This can be ascertained by their currently available organogram on their website, which shows that the buses wouldnt be on Dana's list of responsibility, nor possibly the cameras on the street---whilst, as I'd remembered sh'ed've had oversight of them alongside many of her subordinates due to the location of the cameras in the offices. I'm in no way appologising as the impotus was to get the info. out and my logic was good, and as I'd just caught on to it, time was of the essence. Evidence of conspiracy hardly offers much in the way of defence to the guilty suspected party who initially sparked my interest in the whole strategic necessity in TfL being the main organisation where the terrorists would have to be placed. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X08PkTZu_50

1. I don't think you're hands aren't doing it to trick yourself, but you may be tricking yourself in another way, but then the definition of yourself comes into focus. 2. Why are there such alleged polarised 'views' (aka brainwashed acceptable non-opinions) touted. Creationist, Bible Believer, or, Chimpanzee Swing non-Charles Darwin, 'Darwinist Evolutionist' (Eugenics)-idiots? Neither's scientifically possible, let alone provable, so why are all primary school children ordered that they are facts? Then there's the scientific method, which also links in, for whom we have to thank Rupert Sheldrake, who can put in perspective from a wide range of worked through theories, reverse engineered from actual real-life experiments and phenomenon, which are well accepted as reality. This is the Hegelian Dialectic in play, so as that's being used, as per the biggest stick of the overlord, there must be something important in play, which is why these two flawed concepts are being pushed; I say flawed as Evolutionism is pure nonsense, but the ongoing perpetuation of things associated with Adam and Eve is no accident, as it is very close to the truth, and indeed, I believe, is a cover for or euphamism of what really lies beneath the sillyhead speculation, whilst shrouded in sillyhead cover, that it may never be taken seriously by the mass, unless they are actually believing it in reality, thus even worse than Darwinianists. Please let me know what you think. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1ZSUst4jEY