Anytime anyone wants to lock you up for questioning their story, its 100% certain that their story is a lie. What I don't know is when the Holocaust narrative became part of the public discussion. In my very good public high school, in the late 1950's, and in college in the 1960's, there was no mention of the holocaust. Not in texts, not in lectures, and this was very close to WW2, where one would of thought there would at least be some mention of it. By the early 1970's it was everywhere in lectures and texts. So somewhere in that 10 year period, from the early 1960's to the early 1970's, the holocaust narrative become not merely embedded but enshrined and a major tool to be used in which the existence of the Holocaust itself was seen as both a reason to support Israel and a reason never to criticize it. Basicaly it was its get out of jail free card, or if you wish its get out of atrocity free card. And so right now, they've got the Congress, they've go the media in this country, they've got the high road, they've got the publishing houses. We've got holocaust memorials on almost every cross roads and corner gas station in the United States - or we will have shortly, and they've exended it to a number of other key countries. We have not organized, we have not set up an equivalent to AIPAC, we have essentially functioned in a disorganized, disjointed, unfocused way, and we have bought their narrative on the holocaust and anti-semitism to the point that we will go to extreme lengths to avoid being targeted with that brush. We have to face up it, we have to confront them, we have to fight them on their preferred ground, because if we give them the high ground of the Holocaust and new anti-semitism unchallenged, they have won forever. I don't watch television, but one Saturday morning out of curiosity I decided to watch ABC for four hours from 8 until noon. I think I would probably rather go to the gulag rather than do another four hours of that, but in that four hours and five shows there are 7 references to the holocaust, holocaust survivors, or Nazis. And it's not something that's in your face, its just mentioned and there. And this is the most effective form of political socialization. The overt former political socialization is what communist regimes did, where everyone would march in the street waving banners and chanting slogans the rest of it, and you had overt support, but when push came to shove there was no support at all. This type of indirect and subtle socialization is what they sold, and that's why a very large majority of Americans today support what the US government is doing in the middle east with regards to Israel. The third thing that let the Israelis generally, and AIPAC and the Zionists in particular, do so well was that they found a pair of tools that they could use. Tools that they could use both to garner sympathy and support, and to beat down opposition, and one of these is obviously the holocaust. And they have been very successful at this. People in the anti-zionist movement will lower their heads and look aside and try and dodged the bullet of criticism of being a holocaust denier. Excerpts, Alan Sabrosky: Zionism - Deconstructing the Power Paradigm, June 10, 2018 Alan Sabrosky is a retired Marine officer and former Director of Studies at the United States Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute --------------------------------------------- Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational purpose

The establishment says that we must find any place that has “too many Whites” and use immigration and “diversity” to make them less White. "The Sneak Rulers have a very strong sense of ethnicity, they know the value of ethnicity, because they've been practicing it for a long time. They know that when an ethnicity is on a land and forms its own government and its own community, that's what's called a nation state If you can break up a nation state, if you can mulitculturalize, mongrelize it, put it as part of the EU or some multi-national body, you can rule them. Who are they??? Its very dangerous to name them, but it is the people who make the movies that inculcate teh sense of worthlessness in Whites, and the ads. It is they who made the 1965 immigration Act. It is they like Susan Sontag, who wrote 'The White race is the cancer of human history'. It is the people who control the media and now have completely changed the education system. A humanities course at a university in the Western world today is a propaganda course against the White race." "The point is, these very powerful people, the sneak rulers, they have two big goals. One is to genocide and replace the White peoples, replace them on the land, because they prefer to have coloured peoples. The other is to have a strong base in the Middle east, which is why there is all these Middle east wars, to rule it from. Now, their goal is not about 'culture'. Its not about anything else but to colonize these lands with alien people and dispossess you. The real issue is you are being dispossessed of your land and your community, and in the process they have to brainwash you and tell your kids that they're criminals. So they cental issue is will you have a land. You're being dispossessed of a country, of a land where your people and only your people live, and therefore can develop your sole state of mind and conscience." Frank Raymond, Capitalism and Morality, Vancouver, July 21, 2018 Frank Raymond, author of: Sweet Dreams and Terror Cells (When Giants Break the Spell https://www.amazon.com/s?k=FRANK+RAYMOND+SWEET+DREAMS&ref=nb_sb_noss There is a worldwide program to send non-Whites to any area that is “too White.” We name that program what it is: #WhiteGenocide. "Diversity" means "Get rid of the White people". The biggest Scam in human history would be replacing a specific race of people in their own homelands, and convincing them its "Anti-Racism!". "It wasn't because we liked immigrants, but because we didn't like the host White nation and wanted it destroyed." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode)