I wouldn’t usually push a video of a politician speaking inside parliament. But you’ll find this well justified. It’s so surprising (if you didn’t already know it) & shocking to learn that, if the speech was uploaded on YouTube that platform, in its wisdom & discretion, would censor it. Most remarkable is the statistic on ivermectin used as prophylaxis. In a randomised, controlled trial of prophylaxis in hospital staff in Argentina, it yielded a 100% protection against covid19. If ivermectin was taken, no one developed the illness. Don’t you agree it should be made available immediately?? As a drug hunter, it’d be inconceivable to have done better if the drug treatment had been designed & developed with this medical use in mind. Please share this with everyone you know. It’s without question in of the ways to end this absurd tyranny. Dr Mike Yeadon Ps: ivermectin has been used in over 3,000,000,000 (3 billion) doses all over the world & it has a remarkable safety profile. It’s on the WHO’s list of Essential Medicines. Not to use this is corrupt. https://rumble.com/vjbmg7-the-case-for-ivermectin-craig-kelly-mp.html

Yesterday , I quoted extensively from AnnaMaria Cardinalli’s stunning Crisis article that concluded there was the murder of an infant, in order to obtain the cell line used in COVID vaccine testing. I put out a call to medical professionals to weigh in on her analysis. Here is the basic ramification: THERE IS A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FOR THE WHOLE WORLD. For all people of faith. Every faith. “According to my religious belief, the murder of an undeniably live infant for any reason is unconscionable and evil, and I refuse the vaccine.” Here is a Force against which no government, no establishment, no secret society, no wealth can stand. I fully understand all sorts of professionals will spout language that purports to show “the infant was not alive, the lab followed all the legal guidelines, this is an old argument that has been debunked…” But this is not just an old argument. This is the equivalent of an opening statement in a murder trial. Nothing less. If religious leaders will read AnnaMaria Cardinalli’s article, they will see how important her charge is. The question isn’t “will people of faith wake up and do what they should”; the question is “how can any person of faith NOT do what they should”. If they will make a stand; if all people of faith will; the entire dire situation we are facing changes in the blink of an eye. Solomon to God: “You have made Your servant king instead of my father David, but I am a little child; I do not know how to go out or come in…Therefore give to Your servant an understanding heart to judge Your people, that I may discern between good and evil.” Gautama Buddha: “To cease from evil, to do good, and to purify the mind yourself, this is the teaching of all the Buddhas.” John 10:10: “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.” Would any church, any religion in the world say that God wants the killing of live infants for the purpose of medical research? In the midst of this COVID tyranny, haven’t we all been looking for an issue that will galvanize huge numbers of people? And not as some kind of stunt. But rather as an inevitable outcome of deep faith. Faith and justice come from the same everlasting tree. I hear the voices that say we can never rouse a billion people from their slumber. But they are wrong. Nothing is impossible. The so-called evidence of history is never more than What Was. And even down through history, “what could never happen” was the status quo until a breakthrough shattered it. For people who missed it, here is my article from yesterday: Was COVID vaccine fetal tissue obtained by the murder of an infant? With the release of COVID vaccines, and then the mandates, we’ve seen a new resurgence of people attempting to gain religious exemptions. Many of these attempts focus on fetal tissue obtained through abortion. On January 19, 2021, AnnaMaria Cardinalli published an explosive article in Crisis Magazine, headlined, “Catholic Conscience and the COVID-19 Vaccine.” Cardinalli details the collection of fetal tissue for the cell line named HEK 293. This cell line was used for “testing” the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines. Cardinalli writes: “We know that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not use any cells derived from abortion in the production process. That is, we know that we are not being directly injected with fetal cells or their engineered descendants (though this fact differs with other manufacturers). We hear that the abortion-derived cell lines were only used in testing, which should somehow comfort us, though it still means that the vaccines from which we seek to benefit depend on the involvement of abortion. We are told that the cell line used in testing came from one abortion, which took place decades ago. These things are all true, but they do not serve to inform us fully.” “What we may not know follows. The most prominent cell line, called HEK 293, comes from an abortion performed in the 1970’s. It’s labeled 293 because that’s how many experimental attempts the researchers needed to get a working cell line. Therefore, though the abortion-to-experiment ratio is not precisely one-to-one, hundreds of abortions went into the project, even if they didn’t ... ( https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/author/jonrappoport/ )

Covid-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca Contents of the pack and another information - "Recombinant , replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus ..."

Danas sam razgovarao sa prijateljem koji je doleteo iz Engleske... ČITAJTE DALJE , LJUDI , KAD VAS MOLIM !!!!!!