Published By
Created On
13 Jul 2022 13:42:28 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
911 World Trade Center: Both Towers going away as viewed from Brooklyn
In my view a large portion of the world are still suffering from PTSD and that can close their minds to an alternative explanation of what they think happened.
Most people can still remember where they were, what they were doing and how they felt when they saw the first tower going away and then a few minutes later the remaining tower went away.
The video, by Tim Main and Mike Ballou shows people watching the twin towers from Brooklyn after the two towers were “hit”.
I want you to notice something, but you need to look closely and put everything you know or understand aside and open your mind…
Look at how the first tower goes away at 3 minutes 15 seconds. The top part starts moving down and tilts. Then it sems like the whole top part just turns to dust before the rest of the tower goes down. Just after the first tower went away, you see the remaining tower frothing on one side. It’s not dust from the first tower. You can see the trothing getting intenser and intenser. Why was it frothing below the “impact” site?
Also notice by the time the top part of the remaining tower came down (6:30), it looked like the top part just wasn’t there anymore, so how could it have enough weight to pulverize the rest of the floors below?
You basically see a building being “peeled away” like a banana, and then there is a spire of coulombs, higher than Building 7, that was a 47-story building, and the coulombs seem to vaporize into dust.
Now I’m no architect, engineer, or scientist, but any average dumb guy can see that “demolition” does not turn steel to dust in mid-air. Have a look at this video closely and try and see what I see.
Most people can still remember where they were, what they were doing and how they felt when they saw the first tower going away and then a few minutes later the remaining tower went away.
The video, by Tim Main and Mike Ballou shows people watching the twin towers from Brooklyn after the two towers were “hit”.
I want you to notice something, but you need to look closely and put everything you know or understand aside and open your mind…
Look at how the first tower goes away at 3 minutes 15 seconds. The top part starts moving down and tilts. Then it sems like the whole top part just turns to dust before the rest of the tower goes down. Just after the first tower went away, you see the remaining tower frothing on one side. It’s not dust from the first tower. You can see the trothing getting intenser and intenser. Why was it frothing below the “impact” site?
Also notice by the time the top part of the remaining tower came down (6:30), it looked like the top part just wasn’t there anymore, so how could it have enough weight to pulverize the rest of the floors below?
You basically see a building being “peeled away” like a banana, and then there is a spire of coulombs, higher than Building 7, that was a 47-story building, and the coulombs seem to vaporize into dust.
Now I’m no architect, engineer, or scientist, but any average dumb guy can see that “demolition” does not turn steel to dust in mid-air. Have a look at this video closely and try and see what I see.
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
English
More from the publisher
VIDEO
9/11
Final-Though-on-September-11-
The most disastrous habit is to outsource your thinking to other people. COVID should have taught you that.
Extract from the 9/11 Observable Evidence series
Part 1 – 9/11 Deprogramming - The scientific Method & Why do we still have a cover up? (4.5 hours) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7
Part 2 – 9/11 Deprogramming -Critical thinking (1 hour) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Deprogramming-Part-2:f
Part 3 – 9/11 Deprogramming - Thermite, Space beams, 9/11 Energy Connection (3 hours) – https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Deprogramming-Part-3:8
Part 4 – 9/11 Deprogramming - Perception management (2 hours) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Deprogramming-Part-4:d
Part 5 – Liars for truth (3 hours) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Deprogramming-Part-4:d
Part 6 – 9/11 The Essential Guide (1 hour) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-The-Essential-guide2:e
Feel free to share, upload and distribute please reference “9/11 A Revision” - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
VIDEO
9/11
Space-Weapons-in-Use
'High tech space weapons are in use. The U.S. and Israeli military are lying about them. They're well established in the public record.'
Video shows the Mobile Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) & mobile version (MTHEL).
Lasers have been weaponized since 1971, at least.
See Col. Doug Beason's glorification of ABL (airborn lasers), ADS (active denial systems), RME (relay mirrors) and SSL (solid state lasers) in his book - The Electron Bomb: How America's New Directed Energy Weapons Will Change the Way Future Wars Will Be Fought (2005).
Vid calls attention to the prize-winning documentary Panama Deception.
The GHW Bush invasion of Panama in Dec 1989 was used as a testing ground for laser-maser-crazer weapons.
Prof. Fitrakis spoke at the Madison 9/11 conference hosted by Prof. Jim Fetzer, Aug 5, 2007 filmed by Josh Harvey of Snowshoefilms (pt. 2 of 2).
Scenes from Star Wars in Iraq and Panama Deception
Video credit: https://youtu.be/s1XUetle8-I
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
VIDEO
9/11
Gage-5-September-2023
What does it take for you to distrust someone?
Thought experiment:
This is Richard Gage, formerly with AE911Truth and also involved with the "International Center for 9/11 Justice" - Having a discussion on Sept 5, 2023;
Richard as well as his lawyer DENIES in this zoom meeting that they know about a Federal Qui-Tam (whistleblower) case, filed (2007) in which the 23 NIST subcontractors were accused of science fraud.
BUT, as you will see in these 3 clips, in June 2023 & in 2011 he was asked about the Federal Qui-Tam (whistleblower) case, filed (2007) and he CONFIRMS knowing about it.
The question asked:
Thank you for being able to ask a COVID & 9/11 related question:
This is for Richard especially, but Mike’s feedback, as a lawyer, would be appreciated…
With regards to court cases against NIST, I have done some reading and I have found that there were several cases filed against NIST and especially the 23 subcontractors who NIST tasked with drawing up reports that made up the 10 000-page NIST report over the last couple of years.
Here we have a 10,000-page NIST investigation that investigated everything that happened after the towers suffered damaging explosions and then ended before the towers underwent their final demise.
Their language was “up to the initiation of collapse.” That is science fraud. Any lawyer worth his salt should know that.
To get to my question:
2 Cases were filed by TWO professors in 2007 against these 23 subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD and ONE of these cases was filed as high up as the US Supreme court in 2009.
So, my question is, why have you been keeping MUM about these cases and the EVIDENCE presented, for the last 14 years and why is Richard Gage, AE911Truth AND the International Center for 911 Justice not talking about these cases, seeing it demolishes your THEORIES on explosives and Thermite?
Lastly. Richard, why are you trying so hard to keep yourself and the rest of your soldiers relevant in the so called “truther” movement, seeing you’ve been showed to be a disinformation agent like Fauci and the NIH?
You seem to be the COVID virus of the 9/11 truth.
Transaction
Created
8 months ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
VIDEO
SEPT
Sept-12-cleanup-resized
Sept 12, 2001 Cleanup operations and so many questions
Read my substack: https://911revision.substack.com/
Video clip 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7WRB8rZOpU
Video clip 2 - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911truth-Irrefutable:2
Video clip 3 - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-The-Essential-guide2:e
Where did the towers go? - https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Transaction
Created
9 months ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
VIDEO
9/11
Plane-speeds-are-suspect
Definitively explaining that NO PLANE could have flown at the speeds and altitude to hit the Twin Towers as claimed.
What you saw on TV was CGI done in post production.
Look for more plane video's on this channel
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
VIDEO
9/11
16.-Lie-behind-door-no-2-(Gage-and-Jones)
Excerpt from the documentary: 9/11 – “Where Did the Towers Go? (2nd edition)” - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/Where-Did-the-Towers-Go-2nd-edition:1
https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming / odysee.com/@911revisited:7
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
VIDEO
9/11
Relics-from-the-Rubble-2002
It’s interesting looking back at videos like this, as it shows you a lot of truth that people could not comprehend would give you a clue to what actually happened and there is also a little bit of disinformation added to keep the official government narrative alive.
As you watch this at the 5-minute 25 sec mark, notice HOW little rubble there is…
Then go google some pictures to see how massive a 110-story building actually is.
You have people promoting and believing explosives / thermite turned those buildings mostly to dust in mid-air.
At 7-minutes 50 sec, pause again and you’ll see the Banker’s Trust Building on the left and opposite it, where the South Towe stood – The South Tower and its rubble is nowhere to be found. In the foreground, you’ll see about 25% of what was left of Building 4 – The rest of the building disappeared! The South Tower did not fall down and crush Building 4.
Then from the 20-minute mark – A lot of assumptions get made, but you’ve got to remember, in 2002 people had no frame of mind for Directed Energy of the Hutchison Effect. Rather telling is at 21 minutes – pause and look.
Fused fabric and shoe insoles inside a bundle of twisted steel, aka no high heat, was involved! (Ignore the clown engineer tasked with downplaying and covering up this evidence of cold-DEW)
From 25 minutes 20 seconds, you possibly have the most telling description on the dustification of the contents of the towers.
Transaction
Created
7 months ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
VIDEO
9/11
on-top-of-the-world-trade-center-benny-wyer-yt
Amazing video footage Benny Wyer took at the World Trade Center in the summer of 2001.
Never forget 9/11
Credit: Benny Wyer - https://youtu.be/XQiqoI0QNwg
https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming / odysee.com/@911revisited:7
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
VIDEO
9/11
Rigged_for_explosives_and_everything_that_goes_boom_is_not_a_bomb
Rigged for explosives and everything that goes boom is not a bomb it's Scott Packs.
Excerpt from “9/11 - Empirical Evidence is the TRUTH that THEORY must mimic” - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/Empirical-eveidence-is-the-truth-that-theory-should-mimic:5
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English