Argument (make certain to see 1 of 2) is: That Anton's claims about language are put forth as if they were Ubiquitous facts. I respond saying NO they are not ubiquitous there are exceptions and derivatives. To which he concedes saying that 'what WE mean by WE, in reference to language is Modern western those who are likely to see this video' . And by doing this he reveals that there is another kind/type of language which IS NOT modern western indo european. ~--that is the concession that I wanted and got.

What does a language look like when it has no recursion?
Well, they don't have the History, social history, God, MATH, teleology, nor hierarchy.

Anton then goes on to try to get me to state what are the differences between this group of people and other animals? The Piraha still have language and symbols. Yet the fact that their language appears to be akin to 'first order logic' and not 'second order logic' In that their is not hierarchy. And by Hierarchy I mean holding a position within an authorial culture.

See My total drive at doing this is to show a light upon Authoritarianism itself and underscore it. Show that it is not a REQUIRED part of all human languages, but that it is an aspect we, as modern westerners, habituate.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYFhqbftYb0