WHAT exactly happened to those 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
1. No planes could hit the buildings – Research American Airlines 587 that crashed in November 2001 – It is physically impossible for a plane to fly at the suggested speed of 500mph and at the height of the Towers – You’ve got to be a MORON to believe planes hit the building… https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/Dr-Judy-Wood-CENSORED-No-Planes-on-911:e after you realise that the planes you saw on TV, weren't real planes, you might be ready for this - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Alchemy:6
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the building and the observable evidence at ground zero, that AE911truth never touch on…
1. Building 3 – 14 Survivors - It was a 22 story building – 90% of that building completely went away, all the way to ground level and the 10% of it that was still standing (about 6 floors)
2. Building 4 – 9 stories - It also went away – all the way to ground level – Poof gone.
3. Building 5 – 9 stories - Had cylindrical holes in it, 24 feet wide, that went all the way to ground level
4. Building 6 – 8 stories - Had the middle of it scooped out, all the way to ground level as well as 13 cylindrical holes, 24 feet in diameter on the edges and close to the scooped-out centre of the building and all these holes went down to ground level.
5. Building 7 – 47 stories or 4 and a half Titanic’s’ stacked on top of one another – Was frothing away the whole day until just the outer skin of the building was left and at 5:20pm SILENTLY fell into it’s own footprint, it left the seismic reading of just 2 stories hitting the ground
6. The Twin Towers – 16 Survivors (9/11 surfer included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s stacked on top of one another. The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris - POOF they are gone into a HUGE DUST cloud
7. Bankers Trust Building – (Across the street from the WTC complex) Was heavily damaged and rebuilt, just to be completely taken apart 5 years later due some lingering aftereffects affecting the structure of the steel in the building.
Why has AE911Truth been “distracting” from all these points and especially focussing on WT 7 for the last 7 years – Has AE911Truth forgotten about ALL 7 WTC buildings that had massive anomalies that don’t fit the NIST Report and the “9/11 truth” movement’s THEORIES regarding “controlled demolition”, squib explosives, nukes or mini nukes?
Why have you not intensely investigated the observable evidence that was left at the crime scene that was ground zero?
AE911Truth keeps on asking for an “independent forensic study” of WHAT happened at the WTC complex, when such an “independent forensic study” has been done and the EVIDENCE was submitted as high up as the Supreme court of America, via a Qui-Tam case against NIST and the subcontractors who wrote the NIST Report, for SCIENCE fraud.
Why does AE911Truth censor anyone who brings this up and why is AE911Truth keeping mum about this?
Time for AE911truth to stop lying to their supporters - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-The-Essential-guide2:e
Also See:
http://www.drjudywood.com/
http://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
http://www.checktheevidence.com/
https://www.richplanet.net/
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/uri-geller-warns-nasa-prepare-26072083
Mitoa Edjang, a Spanish pilot explains why he finds the official 9/11 account unconvincing.
With particular attention upon the hijackers and whether it could be possible for inexperienced pilots and even experienced pilots to have been able to accomplish the precision needed for the 911 attacks.
http://reinvestigate911.org
Video Credit: https://youtu.be/QMJUJO794f8
Telegram: https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming
Twitter: https://twitter.com/911Revisionist
Substak: https://911revision.substack.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/879905060007964
Look, James has done amazing work with his various 9/11 documentaries, but is he a limited hangout?
Excerpt from the 9/11 Observable Evidence Series, Liars for Truth, available on this channel.
"But None of His Clothes Were Burned" - Stephen Newman Saves 9/11 Burn Victim Kenneth Summers
In this video I go over the remarkable and puzzling story of Stephen Newman rescuing 9/11 burn victim Kenneth Summers, whom was completely burned from head to toe with all of his skin coming off from his forearms and face, and his hair was all gone, but somehow none of his clothes were burned!
This is a baffling witness testimony that has been largely ignored by both mainstream and alt-media channels, besides a few disinfo channels focusing on the part about an "explosion". As with all things 9/11, the events that took place that day involved advanced highly classified directed energy technology capable of turning entire buildings and even people into dust.
This witness testimony show cases that Kenneth (Ken) Summers was affected by a non-conventional phenomenon, capable of burning his skin but keeping his clothes in tact. Listening to Ken closely, it appears he was also also "thrown out" of the building, but which he states "next thing I know I was lying out in the middle of the driveway".
This appears to be another case of levitation, which was also experienced by many others on 9/11.
Furthermore, Stephen Newman said that another surreal thing he witnessed was of the thousands of people he saw on the morning of 9/11, there was not a single victim besides Ken. The full extent of what actually happened on 9/11 requires a lifetime quest to explore, and explore I shall!
Original videos and MSM articles about the story:
September 29, 2007 video: Stephen Newman ABC interview on September 12, 2001:
https://youtu.be/R6iIELNRkBY
July 17, 2011 video: Kenneth Summers NBC interview:
https://youtu.be/1IPT548KzT8
May 23, 2017 video: Kenneth Summers TIME interview:
https://youtu.be/naOsHONFd8Q
September 9, 2016 TIME article about the video: Survivors of Terror Attacks on How They Moved Forward: ‘You Live Anyway’:
https://time.com/4484248/911-september-11-anniversary-terror-attack-survivors/
September 6, 2011 article by CBS: 9/11 Burn Victim Recounts Story Of His Rescue By Stranger:
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/911-burn-victim-recounts-story-of-his-rescue-by-stranger/
October 14, 2001 article by New York Times: Trade Center Burn Victim's Long Road:
https://archive.ph/x2RP0
Uploaded with permission, thank you MES
https://youtu.be/c6zN0-FH7ks
So, it was nukes and not controlled demolition?
Extract from the 9/11 Observable Evidence series
Part 1 – 9/11 Deprogramming - The scientific Method & Why do we still have a cover up? (4.5 hours) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7
Part 2 – 9/11 Deprogramming -Critical thinking (1 hour) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Deprogramming-Part-2:f
Part 3 – 9/11 Deprogramming - Thermite, Space beams, 9/11 Energy Connection (3 hours) – https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Deprogramming-Part-3:8
Part 4 – 9/11 Deprogramming - Perception management (2 hours) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Deprogramming-Part-4:d
Part 5 – Liars for truth (3 hours) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Deprogramming-Part-4:d
Part 6 – 9/11 The Essential Guide (1 hour) - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-The-Essential-guide2:e
Feel free to share, upload and distribute please reference “9/11 A Revision” - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7
Here the guys describe tests that were done as far back as the early 1970's...
How far could this work have been taken by 2001?
Look for the playlist on "DEW" on this channel, if you want to look into it more...
This is a very well put together discussion of the "spires" of the Twin Towers by "The 9/11 Blacklist", but I do have some critiques...
I will share some of my thoughts with the various time stamps and below that I will link to the original content creator.
Interesting snippets to look at;
Start to 7:00 – Building of the Towers
7:00 to 10:03 – See the South Tower Spire frothing.
11:55 to 13:55 – Another view of spire
13:55 to 15:39 – Another view of spire 2
15:40 to 19:00 - Dr Judy Wood on NORTH TOWER Spire
19:00 to 20:12 - The Blacklist “nuke” theory that just “does not cut it” in my opinion.
- Reason why the “nuke” theory does not work is due to the survivors in stairway B of the North tower, because if “nukes” were used, they would be dead.
20:13 to 24:18 - “Controlled demolition” is such a laugh – When the towers came down, there were NO EXPLOSIONS heard and the example showed is a 37 story mainly concrete building, without nearly the same amount of steel the towers had, and the towers were nearly 3 times the height of the example in this short section.
24:19 to 26:10 - Discussing the Towers’ demise in relation to the controlled demolition of the 37-story building. Do they look at all similar? Again, “nukes” does not do this – 14 people survived at the bottom of the North Tower’s spire – They heard no bombs, saw no bright thermite flashes, did not go deaf or blind and had NO steel beams fall on them. After the dust cleared, they saw BLUE SKY above them. What causes steel to turn into dust in mid-air?
27:02 to 29:12 – Slow mow of NORTH Spire
27: 02 to 30:52 – Slow motion of the North Tower spire discussion
33:55 to 35:38 – Best North Spire mix – without commentary
35:39 to 36:42 - Does this look like a controlled demolition?
Video credit: The 9/11 Blacklist - https://odysee.com/@leighapted17:8/The-Spire-Disappearing-Steel-Magic-Trick-odysee:f
Perhaps the strangest, horrific, powerful & surreal event on Tuesday, September 11th 2001 was how the Twin Towers were completely destroyed between 10-15 seconds each.
The destruction of the Twin Towers has never properly been explained to this day. The mystery of it is what keeps people wanting more.
21 years on and with a new generation looking into research on 9/11...think about the official narrative and what is presented.
The Official Website: https://www.discoverystudioworld.co.uk/
Refreshed for Odysee 14th March 2023