The Oxen top brass recently sat down to answer some of your burning questions about the future of the project. Check out our answers in detail here, or if you don't have the time you can skim through our blog which provides a summary of what went down:
https://oxen.io/blog/orc-8-amaTimestamps:
0:00 - Intro
0:56 - What does ORC-8 stand for?
2:29 - Differences between Oxen & SENT
4:50 - Will SENT be a fork of Oxen, a new chain, or something else?
6:38 - How will the transition work logistically?
8:43 - Will you delay launching Session Pro until SENT happens?
9:42 - How involved will the community be in the transition?
11:27 - Will ONS records be retained?
13:17 - Will SENT compromise the privacy of buying ONS records?
16:50 - Will Oxen holders be able to swap for SENT?
17:19 - How badly will Oxen holders be diluted?
20:24 - Will service node ops receive rewards in SENT?
22:06 - Why should I keep running nodes?
25:31 - Won't SENT experience similar regulatory pressure to Oxen?
29:59 - Does SENT sacrifice the project's privacy ethos?
34:48 - What will the team do to channel Session success into SENT?
39:57 - Will the EVM changes allow monetisation with smart contracts
42:30 - How does the marketing team plan to sell the project's long term value?
48:57 - Is the OPTF considering a jurisdiction change?
50:11 - Has the OPTF sold any Oxen in the past 3, 6 or 12 months?
50:31 - How will the OPTF utilise the FLIP they receive?
52:13 - When SENT launch?
55:47 - Is this why Jeff actually left?
56:43 - How will we take care of Oxen holders and stakers?
61:20 - Final Comments
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpqbKJGTwoM