There is a lot of theology which is not actually in the Bible when it comes to Early Genesis. For example, the idea that we get our sin nature because we are physically descended from Adam. It is a misunderstanding which hinders people from understanding the cosmology of early Genesis. This topic is just a small part of what is discussed in the book "Early Genesis, the Revealed Cosmology" available on Amazon https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XRLDYJB ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92dneKaRf_Q

I finally got around to reading "The Unseen Realm". I was prepared to like it, but unfortunately we don't see the two key passages used in the book the same way at all. One of those is in the 82nd Psalm ( Psalm 82:6 in particular ). Here I explain why, in my opinion, M. Heiser has this verse wrong, as well at the 89th Psalm. And if he has one of his two key verses this wrong, it is unlikely that his overall thesis is right. Here is a link to my take on his other keynote passage from Deuteronomy 32 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLuz0BPWSgM&t=2s The Nephilim and the Sons of God in the Christ-Centered Model: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfrjkS54Bdc And here is why scripture doesn't really teach that angels or spirit beings are "God's sons", with the discrepancy in Job explained: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IcMiVA3HhU Also "Do not delight in the religion of the angels" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eag28Z_tGrU I have put together some blog posts....... Here is my written response to his "Naked Bible #249" podcast where he asks whether or not Israelites viewed their judges as Elohim. http://earlygenesistherevealedcosmology.blogspot.com/2020/12/a-fan-of-m-heiser-challenges-me-to.html Here is a blog post on why I think he has Deuteronomy 32 wrong.... http://earlygenesistherevealedcosmology.blogspot.com/2020/11/michael-heiser-doesnt-have-deuteronomy.html And why I think he has "Elohim" wrong..... http://earlygenesistherevealedcosmology.blogspot.com/2020/11/nor-does-michael-heiser-have-elohim.html And probably "Sons of Elohim" wrong as well..... http://earlygenesistherevealedcosmology.blogspot.com/2020/11/michael-heiser-probably-has-sons-of-god.html I think he over-emphasizes places, or perhaps another way to put it is that he leaves off the very important ending- that they don't matter much now if they ever did because they were used for a purpose which has been fulfilled in Christ. http://earlygenesistherevealedcosmology.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-proper-place-of-places-in-our.html Link to my book: Early Genesis the Revealed Cosmology https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XRLDYJB ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmvqpCs6RXU

What is the most troubling passage of scripture in the bible on the subject of women? 1 Corinthians Chapter 11 seems to imply that men are in the image of God but not women. It isn't really saying that, but why isn''t it? This is a hot potato that few want to handle, and when they do, they just seem to barely touch it. A proper view of Genesis 1 and the Image of God resolves this paradox. The Christ-centered approach to Early Genesis is the key. The interlinear translation of Genesis 1:27 showing it does say "ha-adam" there and not just adam https://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/1-27.htm Amazon page for "Early Genesis, the Revealed Cosmology" https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XRLDYJB The bible does not teach that people are intrinsically "in the image of God" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PKP0IIWRtg They are doing in the NT too: Jesus called Himself the Son of THE Man https://youtu.be/FgSHUgrpBR0 ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fvj8nGSVNJA

The bible does not really teach that Adam was the sole father of mankind, or the first biological human. In fact, the account fits better with a Christ-centered model for early Genesis if he isn't. Mark Moore is the author of "Early Genesis, the revealed cosmology" and here he makes the scriptural case that there were other humans outside the garden. This is an improved version of one of his earliest videos. Some resources mentioned in the video: A link to an interlinear translation of Genesis 1:27 so that the viewer can verify Mark's claim about the original text of the verse and "THE man"- https://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/1-27.htm And here is a record of a dialogue I had with a Hebrew scholar over the issue of the translation of 1:27 https://earlygenesistherevealedcosmology.blogspot.com/2020/01/i-dialogue-with-hebrew-scholar-over.html Here is the definition of "kabash" which is translated "subdue" in 1:28 https://biblehub.com/hebrew/3533.htm And the word translated ""dominion" in that verse is almost as harsh and militaristichttps://biblehub.com/hebrew/7287.htm And here is the link to the root word that is translated "host" in 2:1 https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6635.htm CHRIST is the image of God, not us, unless we are in Him. video to explain https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PKP0IIWRtg&t=2s And the link to the video breaking down Acts 17:26 vs Gen. 2:1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xUH9V6V2qQ And the link to the book, "Early Genesis, the revealed cosmology" where the case for the Christ-centered model for all of early Genesis is laid out. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XRLDYJB ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHCVGtBIoFE