Many people thought that the little money they have, to survive this 2020, should not be given to the tax collectors. That's why they told their employers or some other debtors "Pay me next year". Because, one would think, he should not pay taxes on the money he didn’t receive. Since the deadline for paying taxes is April 2021, for all the earnings that came into your hands by the end of 2020, asking those who owe you to pay you in January 2021 seems like a smart move to defer paying taxes on that earnings for April 2022. Nope! ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUsuUrZl8Kk

The leader of a Fortune 500 company, which abuses workers, a drug user who, while hallucinating, writes tweets that financially endanger investors. It was all written as a reaction to Musk's tweet in which he says that he is giving a donation of 100 million dollars to whoever has the best carbon capture technology. On top of this insulting cake is a cherry that says, “the $100 million prize is only 0.05% of your net worth“ which means it's a little money, he needs to give more. Let's start from the beginning. Dharna Noor, a writer at earther.gizmodo.com, wrote an article that reached a high position in Google search in just a few minutes. In the article, she presented the mentioned claims as proof that Musk is not qualified to determine which technology has the greatest potential to sequester carbon pollution from the atmosphere. The article is written with a mixture of serious statements, irony and sarcasm, so it is best to read it yourself at the link below. In short, Dharna accuses Musk of hypocrisy, stating that Tesla cut down trees in Germany to make room for the construction of a giant factory, until some, I quote, “silly environmentalists” stopped the process. She wrote, “I’ve been doing some reading, and it turns out trees are super good at pulling carbon out of the air. It’s this innovative new technology called photosynthesis.” She proposes that Musk give $ 100 million to preserve the health of the Tongass National Forest, whose trees have pulled roughly 650 million tons of carbon out of the atmosphere. She goes on to make suggestions and says: Forests aren’t the only option. There’s also wetlands, salt marshes, great whales, etc. In her article, Dharna semi-openly claims that Musk, not only is a hypocrite, but also that he gives this prize in order to improve his public relations, and not out of concern for the planet. She wrote: “The Salesforce guy wants to plant 1 trillion trees, and do you really wanna be competing with him for PR? The point of dropping a $100 million prize is to make a splash.” https://earther.gizmodo.com/some-truly-disruptive-suggestions-for-elon-musks-100-m-1846109017 ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEj1IhCrqhY