LBRY Block Explorer

LBRY Claims • court-precedent-destroys-trump's-2024

66171f7440499829af4848becc1ed28d370c63ae

Published By
Created On
16 Sep 2023 15:24:42 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
Court Precedent Destroys Trump's 2024 Legal Challenge
Groups across the country are filing legal challenges to Donald Trump’s re-election campaign, and they are arguing that the 14th Amendment prevents Trump from being legally able to hold office. But can those arguments hold up in court? That’s a question that a lot of people may not like the answer to. Mike Papantonio & Farron Cousins discuss more.

Link - https://truthout.org/articles/watchdog-files-lawsuit-to-block-trump-from-running-for-president-again/

Check out our merch by visiting our store: https://www.buyrof.com/

Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com

Become a member today!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibRcZav6xMLo9qWWw/join

Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!

Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire

Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RingofFireMedia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

Groups across the country are filing legal challenges to Donald Trump's reelection campaign, and they're arguing that the 14th Amendment prevents Trump from being legally able to hold office. But can those arguments hold up in court? Well, we're gonna have to answer that question. Go ahead. Pick it up and I, you know, this is a loser. It's a loser.
Yeah, look. I mean, this is something I've talked to, I've done so many segments on this, and I'll say what I've always said. Listen, do I think that Donald Trump engaged and spurred these people on January 6th? I absolutely believe that.
I think he did too.
Now, could I prove that in court? Well, I'm not a lawyer, so I wouldn't have the chance, but I couldn't prove it in court. And the reason for that is because there are so many different things with the events of January 6th. Not just the 14th Amendment. There's so many different things that are open to interpretation. You know, was it an insurrection or was it a riot? Was it a protest? Because if it's a riot or a protest, 14th Amendment automatically doesn't apply. You're done. Case over. So, because there's no official declaration, because none of the people have been charged with insurrection, you can't even base it off, okay, well, we charged eight people with insurrection.
Right. Right.
There's no legal basis almost for this to even be there.
Here's where it really, this is the bell ringer. Okay. Oh, first of all, you and I are supposed to yell at each other according to the MAGA Dems. Farron, why don't you yell at Mike when he says something about Biden or says something about, and I'm supposed to yell at you when we disagree. We don't yell. We have a conversation just like the one we're having right now. So we've known each other for what, 21 years? We've been doing this for 21 years. So we're not children, and we're not gonna yell and scream at each other when we disagree. I love that about doing this show. But here's the problem. You've got the National Socialist Party of America versus the Village of Skokie. Now, that is the premier, just do a search, that is the premier US Supreme Court case that says that even if he did some of this. So what, okay. That's a case, Farron, where the Supreme Court had to make a decision. Do we allow Nazis, I mean, hundreds of Nazis to walk through an area of Skokie, the village of Skokie, where you have most of the people in there had been Holocaust survivors. The Jewish, the number of Jewish Holocaust survivors was over the top. But the Supreme Court says, we're still gonna allow them to walk through with bullhorns talking about Jews with Nazi flags, with doing what they want to do. That case kills the possibility of anything happening here, where it comes to inciting a riot. And I gotta tell you something, I'm convinced that's what he wanted to do. I mean, I don't have any doubt. But you've got a First Amendment issue. You've got precedent. You've got so much precedent. The National Socialist Party of America versus Village of Skokie is just overwhelming. I mean, just read it and you go, hmm, this is like the very edge of saying, yeah, you can do what you want to do.
Well, and I'm sure there's gonna be people that say, yeah, okay, y'all are talking about the Capitol Riot, but what about his attempts to overturn the election results? Okay. We'll address that right now too. Does that rise to the level of an insurrection? Well, who was the government of that day? That was him. Was he launching an insurrection against himself?
That's right.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QQegHjQsn0
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
English
Open in LBRY

More from the publisher

Controlling
VIDEO
PAPAN
Controlling
VIDEO
JULIA
Controlling
VIDEO
RON D
Controlling
VIDEO
TRUMP
Controlling
VIDEO
MARJO
Controlling
VIDEO
MARJO
Controlling
VIDEO
LARA
Controlling
VIDEO
CLEVE
Controlling
VIDEO
DEMOC