? Requests use this link https://streamelements.com/tradespotting/tip ? Join the Community & Get the RO Flash http://www.patreon.com/RockyOutcrop ? The Trading School https://www.technicalanalysis.school ? Become a youtube Member https://bit.ly/doomslayers ? Tip via Crypto https://1upcoin.com/donate/youtube/tradespotting ? Buy Unreasonable Merch https://unreasonable.shop ? Watch Rocky https://www.youtube.com/rockyoutcrop ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2Z-ENJzbJI

? Requests use this link https://streamelements.com/tradespotting/tip ? Join the Discord http://www.discord.gg/RockyOutcrop ? Become a YouTube Member https://bit.ly/doomslayers In a recent revelation that has sent shockwaves through the financial world, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has determined that former Barclays PLC chief executive, Jes Staley, acted "recklessly" concerning the disclosure of his association with the infamous financier, Jeffrey Epstein. The FCA’s findings have ignited a maelstrom of questions, leaving the public wondering why such lies were told, what these untruths imply about the connection between the ex-Barclays CEO and Epstein, and what secrets might be so significant that they outweigh the staggering financial penalties imposed. Barclays issued a statement, encapsulating the FCA’s verdict, stating that Staley had acted recklessly by approving a letter dated 8 October 2019, which contained misleading information about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The Regulatory Decisions Committee at the FCA board concluded that this letter breached multiple rules of conduct, including integrity, cooperation with regulators, and appropriate disclosure of information. Consequently, the FCA imposed a hefty fine of £1.8 million on Staley and banned him from the financial services industry. The critical questions that emerge from this case are myriad. Why did Staley feel compelled to mislead regulators about his ties to Epstein? What was the nature of their association, and why was Staley willing to jeopardize his career by withholding crucial information? These questions lead to a broader inquiry into the hidden truths that might be lurking beneath the surface. Furthermore, the connection between Staley and Epstein raises eyebrows and prompts speculation. What could prompt a high-profile banking executive to associate with someone like Epstein, especially considering the serious legal implications surrounding Epstein's activities? The answer to this question could unveil a web of relationships and alliances that extend far beyond what is currently known. As Staley prepares to contest the FCA’s decision in the Upper Tribunal, the financial world waits in anticipation. What could be so significant that Staley is willing to face such severe consequences? The staggering financial penalties, including the suspension of his deferred bonus and executive incentive share plan awards, totaling an estimated £17.8 million, underscore the gravity of the situation. Additionally, the cancellation of £2.1 million in unvested bonuses further emphasizes the seriousness of the misjudgment. It is crucial to note that the FCA’s investigation did not implicate Barclays or any of its other employees, focusing solely on Staley’s actions. However, the shadow of doubt looms large, leading observers to wonder if there might be more to this story than meets the eye. In the wake of Epstein’s tragic demise in 2019, the questions surrounding his connections continue to reverberate. The world watches, intrigued and disturbed, as the truth behind the lies, secrets, and financial penalties slowly unravels, shedding light on a complex web of relationships, decisions, and consequences that have far-reaching implications for the individuals involved and the financial industry as a whole. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVHh-ppvsbM