Did you notice the total lack of 'smartphones'? "People are talking to each other in the old video". Very different times!
Those buildings are massive, eh?
Video by: Michael Runnicles
https://www.youtube.com/@michaelrunnicles7196
-----------------------
https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming
https://twitter.com/911Revisionist
https://911revision.substack.com
Where Did the Towers Go on September 11, 2001?
A scientist has been saying this for almost 22 years and has been presenting it for 19 years and brought it to the attention of NIST 16 years ag. This scientist filed a federal Qui-Tam case about it 16 years ago, and published it all in a book 12 years ago, and the 9/11 "truther" movement knew about the book 12 years ago and confirmed they read it and have actively supressed this information and distracted people away from it by not counting past 3.
Back around 2010, I first heard people claiming Direct Energy Weapons (DEW) were used to destroy the trade towers, I always ignored it.
I thought it was another distraction. Boy was I surprised when I looked into it.
It was claimed the information in this video was controlled opposition to further distract people from "the truth" and even push them away from the 9/11 "truth" movement.
So, I would stick to what we can prove, 100% some form of controlled demolition was indeed the cause of the failures of WTC 1, 2, and 7.
Now, reanalyzing the information and pictures along with the information presented here. I have no idea what to think. Do you?
If what they're saying about the seismic data is correct, even conventional controlled demolition, thermite or nukes makes no sense.
Come join the debate on Telegram: https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming
Some time stamps:
0:00 tot 13:21 - Into to what you may not consider
13:22 tot 16:41 - The seismic data
16:42 tot 26:35 - Building 7
27:27 tot 29:17 - Toasted cars
29:18 to 30:57 - The jumpers
30:58 to 34:38 - The bathtub and pathway trains
34:39 to 37:34 - Erin & Mag field
37:35 to 39:35 - The Fumes
39:36 to 40:58 - What’s with the dirt?
49:59 to 42:59 - Tritium
43:00 to 56:25 - Hutchison and Directed energy
- 45:05 to 49:02 - Hutchison employed by US Government
- 49:02 to 50:54 – Banker’s trust - bending and buckling steel
- 50:55 to 52:58 – Levitation
- 52:59 to 54:26 – Spontaneous combustion and fusion
- 54:27 to 56:25 - NIST and SAIC / ARA
56:27 to 1:03:18 The NIST Report & contractors
1:03:19 to 1:04:24 - Another building disappeared
1:04:25 to 1:07:54 - Boom does not mean a bomb
1:07:55 to 1:11:06 - Attack oh consciousness
1:11:07 to 1:25:33 - Lie behind door no 2 (Gage and Jones)
You can't handle the truth! Cognitive dissonance regarding technology people can't imagine.
Songs:
1 Hour of Sad War Music II Only The Dead Have Seen The End of War
BEST DRAMATIC MUSIC EVER - ROYALTY FREE
Dramatic Action Movie Soundtrack Vanquish Film Music Instrumental
Audiomachine - Dauntless (Epic Powerful Heroic Music)
This remains one of the MANY controversial research documentaries made regarding WHAT happened on 9/11 as it has been shown to be nothing but a disinformation film around the 9/11 events.... It is only here for people to see how deep the rabbit hole goes.... If you work through the full playlist on the plane / no plane distraction playlist, you will see it being addressed in other video's.
Here is some notes from the Mark Conlon Blogspot - The most in depth researcher on the plane / no plane distraction of 9/11....
"I have demonstrated that several parts of this film (and his September Clues film) to contain bogus claims, and in some cases, absolute lies. Simon Shack or should I say Simon (Hytten) his real name, will not correct his many mistakes I have pointed out, and one can only conclude that he is running a psy-op with his films he's made. I pointed this out on Richard D. Hall's show I did called; Layers of Deception, (with Andrew Johnson too). Shack's brother Mario is also connected to the Bin Laden family, and Shack's father worked for United Nations. Shack also did work for the European Space Agency. None of his films would be on my list to wake people up, as it would give them a false impression that the videos were fake, which is deliberately done to conceal the technologies of what really destroyed the towers and also the plane illusion technology they used. They will end believing it was CGI after watching this nonsense." - Mark Conlon Blogspot - https://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/
September Clues~ Director Simon Shack Digitally Remastered Audio & Widescreen Presentation
Nearly 22 years on and with a new generation looking into research on 9/11 it's important to see what kind of disinformation agents were around....
Video Credit: The 9/11 Blacklist - https://odysee.com/@leighapted17:8
The 2007 September Clues by Simon Shack which was a "in-depth analysis" and comparison of the mainstream media's live news coverage of the World Trade Center disaster, which was nothing but a disinformation campaign...
Ever since September 11, 2001 people have been outsourcing their thinking to talking heads in various 9/11 "truther" movements.
Some untold history needs to be shared after 20 years, a bit too late?
Listen to what Professor Morgan Reynolds' 2009 whistleblower, US Supreme Court, Qui-Tam case was about, which never gets discussed by ANYONE.
Discussing air pressure, drag, aerodynamics and then let’s also look at the fraudulent NIST aeroplane impact report, as well as the "alleged" planted aeroplane fuselage and debris at the WTC complex…
Discover SAIC and ARA and their “specialisation in impacts and explosions” and you’ll see they gave NIST fraudulent impact reports pertaining to the “planes” that supposedly hit the towers.
People also seem to struggle wrapping their brains around what the buildings were built with and that there is no way in hell, aluminium can cut through steel, like a hot knife through butter... Just exactly what did those "planes" have to go through?
Anyone that believes jet fuel, explosives, thermite, buried nukes, mini nukes were used, most probably also still believe in fairies, unicorns, and Santa Claus.
Open up your mind, LOOK at what is being presented to you in this video.
Be sure to put on your thinking cap, because a large proportion of people have fallen for the trap of the cover up, believing that the 9/11 "truther" movement are actually looking to expose. Can you handle the truth of WHAT happened to 8 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001?
Ask yourself the question, WHAT are all the 9/11 "truther" talking heads really doing, whilst asking for donations?
What have they achieved in 20 years?
Why, after nearly 22 years, do we still have such a strong cover-up with regards to the events of September 11, 2001?
Why does the 9/11 "truther" movement and Wikipedia not want you to know about the 2009 US Supreme Court Qui-Tam cases? Plural.
STOP outsourcing your thinking.
10 Things to notice in this real time video:
1. No one is making any mention of being burnt by the dust cloud, so no molten iron spheres in the dust burnt them (so, how did close to 1400 vehicles get toasted)
2. So much heavy dust on the ground and paper - Paper everywhere!!
3. What was causing the static interference on the video at the 4:40 mark - where was that static interference coming from?
4. Talking about explosions, not everything that goes boom is a bomb - read: https://911revision.substack.com/p/was-every-boom-a-bomb-on-911
5. What cause the spontaneous combustion of the vehicles in the video and at 5:37 what toasted the cars if the dust cloud was COLD? Read: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-1-400-toasted-cars-on-911
6. At the 6 minute mark, why was building 6 "burning" similar to Building 7 - Remember the massive scooped out hole of Building 6? More static interference in the video, why? More toasted cars....
7. 6 minutes 30 seconds - Fuming of the rubble pile, it sounds weird, not like a fire does - read: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-100-day-fuming-and-molecular
8. 7:46 You're looking at Building 6 and to the right, you should be seeing a 110 story building, but there is no corresponding rubble pile! It should have been at least 30 stories high - Building 6 is a 8 story building!!!
9. 8 minute mark - Building 7: Does that look or sound like a fire? That is something different. Read: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
10. 8:15 - You're looking at Building 7 to the left and Building 6 to the right - That does not look or sound like a fire... That's fuming...
Want some explanations?
Get hold of this book: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/